Section 64 (last updated 4.09.2021)
The idea of the self simulating circuit is a less known and popular notion that people have an intuitive understanding of but have never developed a fully conscious definition of to confirm that initiation. In other words people have heard of it but never have seen it. This is because it is a concept that has not yet fully been discovered. Some people have mentioned the name and attempted to talk about it, and they may have added some description of it, but it still remains to this moment that we are left without an adequate definition. The self simulating circuit is a new concept in science that try’s to explain the ancient and old problem found in philosophy.
In ancient philosophy as found in the Greeks, stemming from the presocratic into Plato culminating with Aristotle. In this tradition they outline the interaction between substances of the same kind, as opposed to substances of different kinds. In other words, how matter interacts with matter, as distinct from how matter interacts with a “non-material” substance. This non material substance is generally outlined as form which is abstract and is conceivable only by way of the mind and not the senses. The counter part ontology of the time, was what is today the dominant ontology of science known as atomism. Atomism both ancient and modern and are an inherently empirical science, meaning that they depend on the interaction between the senses and the object to derive information.
This interaction atomism depend on only explain the interaction between substances of the same kind, I.e., matter interacting with matter. This physical interaction is measured by how closely approximate two discernibly distinct objects come close to each other without being one another. They come into contact while still remaining distinct from each other, but just enough distance so that enough information is passed on from the phenomenon to the observer, as in the case of how the senses derive information, they are characterized as direct verses indirect contact.
Direct contact is the closest measure in distance between two object that the information that one is not the other is passed on to the other while not being identical with the one. But as the senses become more abstract, their interactions with object become less direct and more in direct while still maintaining the relation where information is passed one from phenomena to observer. For example touching is the sense relaying on a more direct interaction with the object as opposed to perception, which is more indirect. As the ancient Greeks use to call “vision is the lightest form of touch; it is the least quantitative form of matter” [paraphrase). The ancient atomist explain that the way we see is dependent on an undeniable matter known as ether, which cannot be sensed either by being seen, touched or experienced directly by any matter, but that it necessarily must exists in order to serve as a plain or dimension which can facilitate the transition of information between object phenomena to sense organ.
In modern times we describe that as the bouncing off of photons from the object and received by the eye and transmitted to the brain where a certain order of the possible events from that object come into congruency making the same sequence continuity of time. This exists on the plain Einstein famously coins as spacetime, which he introduced but failed to fully outline what that concept is. Whitehead with his opposing ontology to Einstein, the latter being a modern atomist from the same tradition of the ancient atomism in terms of apporraiting the same ontology about how the world is structured. Both ancient and modern atomism belive that the world is order and made up of these distinct indivisible discrete measures of matter, that matter is infinitely divided into an inumerable amount of “atoms”, being different things depending on the difference of matter between each object, but the notion that all objects are labeled under as material, and the final definition that the Ancient Greek atomist described but as Einstein failed to fully appropriate in his theory of general space and time, is that atoms are spherical plains of space and time combined together to disclose a possible event or moment in all time, the total possible number of all potential moments.
Whitehead described that as simultaneously and instantaneously present for all time happening all at once. But the observer having this capacity to disclose within their reference frame a certain order of this so called chaos or randomness, an ordered and particular duration of time. Spacetime describes that space and time are Indivisible, that is true, but how they define each concept with the other has convulsions. First, space is defined by Hegel as self external externality is not merely continues: Hegel describes space as a quantity that discloses nothing within itself and therefore it only becomes a self external quantity, a quantity such that if brought in relation to any quality, no mater what that be, discloses only that quality and nothing else, “a quality without itself being a quality”, which is definition of “internal relations”. This mechanics of the universe is appropriated by whiteheads ontology known as organicism, which is the modern counterpart to atomism, and unlike before where atomism was the inferior in terms of public knowledge as compared to the philosophy of Aristotle known as “process philosophy”, but not conceiving the object of being as a present and unmoving entity, but rather seeing the inherent becoming of that object in times, observing the changes and transmutation as it plays out in time.
As Hegel puts it, seeing the becoming of being not its mere abstraction as independently distinct from nothing. I.e., being not as a category distinct from nothing and nothing as a category of what being is not, ie., the opposite of being; but rather by how being transitions into nothing and by vice versa how nothing turns into being, how a thing actually generates into being, I.,e., how it becomes. Hegel we have to keep in mind constitutes the culmination of modern science itself, which ended in an ontological and philosophical conclusion rather than a crude material and scientific one. Modern science as we know it started by Descartes leading into Newton, Spinoza and leibniz, into The beginning of German idealism of Kant ending up in Hegel. After Hegel a new kind of science took gold which consist of the famous Einstein and the infamous counterpart whitehead.
The self simulating circuit deals with the interaction of substances of the same kind , I.e., matter with matter, described by elementary particle physics; as opposed to substances of different type, matter verses form, or object thought. The success of the Ancient Greek tradition resulted in the idea that the most fundamental substance in the universe is fundamentally abstract in nature and not vulgarly material as exhibited by our direct experience of the senses. That thought is the “ultimate good” the highest and therefore the most primary substance, the one found at the beginning, can move but cannot be moved, is unmoved, and this he said is the essence of god, that the highest quality of god is the capacity to reason, thought itself. Hegel took this as the starting point of his science called it “Reason” and tried to study its behaviour and mechanics which he called is categorized under the science of Logic. The idea of logic is that it is not a mere method that the mind conjures up, but is exaclty organic in the way nature behaves at a fundmental level, at the basic level of space and time itself, nature is rational and has logic.
Time here is the key word, because it is concept which Einstein defined successfully by using the definition of space. Time is continuous and that it is physical, meaning that although we cannot directly sense it, it must necessarily be there in order for objects of physics to be capable of motion, in the locomotion sense, and motion in terms of Aristotle’s definition of motion as generation, the motion of a thing coming into being, as Hegel says, as being becoming. Einstein however failed in outlining how spacetime looks, which defines space with the idea of time, that space is made into discrete and distinct frames of reference which discloses an event form the possibilities of them happening into the actuality of each one happening at a different present moment of time.
There are many observers in the world, an elephant does not conceive the world in the same way as an ant, and an ant conceives the world very differently than say a human which is a land hominid creatures, walks on two legs, as compared to a creature that flys. All these different observers in nature are simultaneously and instantaneously conceiving a particular angle from the whole of all possible events, into moments each slightly different of the same thing coexisting. All things are conceiving everything each in a finite abs particular way, and the culmination of the whole of this is conceived as itself a particular measure of a while in which it belongs to as part, and so on and so forth, the whole being not a measure of quantity of each part that makes up the sum, but the whole is inside each part by being the relation which maintains all parts as totalling the sum of the whole.
The so called “fabric” of spacetime is not this empty continuous plain of space and nothing, until we reach other discrete measurable entity within that , which is only slightly continues and momentarily observer. Space as truly in conjunction with time, is the simultaneous and instantaneous coexists of all possible moments being present at the same time and at the same place. The observer however only has a particular conception of all that which form part of the specific duration they are undergoing in as a duration of time.
The idea that each individual is a manifestation of consciousness having a different and unique experience, is in part the notion of the self-excited circuit. Thought and the object, and thought is the object for itself, is the natural condition of having various types of rational beings differentiated by an external environment and related by an internal reason.
The different magnitudes disclosed between substances of different kind, I.,e., between matter and non-matter, or rather the modern equivalent of “antimatter”, the dimension between those two substances of one entering into the other is a measure by degree. There are two different degrees in the magnitude between a material entity and an abstract one, this is the difference between what is outlined as macroscopic and microscopic. A macroscopic measure is the maximum and most extreme degree of quanta, that quantities in this scale are infinitely large and are infinitely distant and apart from each other. While the inverse degree of magnitude enters into an infinitesimally small duration
(Explain this a lot) the self-stimulated circuit explains the nature of consciousness in the object, that consciousness produces the object to experience the knowledge of its idea. The above illustration is a very limited one however. Below is an illustration of the cosmological principle form. In this illustration the point of consciousness encompasses the totality of the object internally and externally.
(Add wormhole is self excited circuit)