Event particles, Whitehead space and motion
Where are they?
The question of what atoms are have been earlier discussed and the conclusion we reached is that atoms are the bear form of the conception. Let us say they are the void that takes on the most bare shape, spherical. This bare form has no identity of its own other than being the substrate, as commonly said in philosophy, the “matter” at hand which endures throughout the change, the “change” being the potentiality to take on any shape, but the change in shape does not change the form of the atom, because it’s form is fundamental. rather the atom remains as a spherical void of some possible thing or thing(s). The changes are the content disclosed by the outline of the shape, the atom consists of a tiny, minute grains of itself.
The atom consists of more atoms, or rather a single atom discloses an infinity of them. And in this disclosure the orientation, position, size, density, volume, mass, etc., all are alterable and change their configuration within their conception, that being the circumference, what happens within it changes. This answers not only what the atom is, but also where the atom is?
When we ask; where are the atoms located? The question is either met with a rudimentary materialist answer that is purely quantitatively motivated, like for example, classical atomist like their modern equivalents, say that the context of the atom is their minutely small size, atoms are very very small. However this naive answer does not take into account the methodology that allows atoms to be empirically studied from what they are as ultimate and absolute principles of nature. In fact the very aim for empirically examining an atom is for the purpose of perceiving and gaining a limited glimpse into them as universal principles. The atoms loose their power of universality if they are only said to be small minute blocks that come to structure nature.
This argument simply misses the point because the atom is made to be limited to a very specific quantitive measure, I.e., small, and so by contrast to the observer, it is not large. However we only suggest that the atoms are small because that is by way how our method came to grasped an image of them. We use advanced magnification technology to make bigger a small and tiny section on an ordinary item of perceptual experience, magnify that, to reveal further details not seen by the natural capacity of perception.
On any object we see a series of discrete measures in which a set of more other objects are disclosed within, it is not that a single object is made up of more objects, but that the atom is the object in which an event is disclosed by and within this event there are what we see as ordinary objects of sensation. It is not that things are made up of small individual atoms placed together, but instead atoms are the form disclosing an event in which these blocks come together as objects forming an object.
The event discloses the object, but the event is an object among other objects from a more broader and general dimensional framework which goes outside itself. It is not necessarily the case that small tiny atoms make up a general object, but that atoms are fundamentally events, which if you enter them, you would see objects, you can enter through any single atom to get to the rest of the universe, i.e., to get to an infinity of objects. They are passages of nature, or rather passages to nature, passages for an observer to enter nature.
What we see under a microscope appears to be objects like the objects of ordinary experience, but this is only because the resolution is bad. Our recent technology is so weak that it cannot pick up the full extent of the atom, the atom is so far away and distant from the tool that it appears glossy, covered with gleam, as if it is some dusty thing. But go closer and closer and what is revealed are infinite details and qualities. It is the same as looking at planets from far away, they look like dry dead rocks, but maginfy closer and enhance the resolution, they began to show colour, textures, valleys and mountains, perhaps even closer you might see water and some life. Atoms are events because any object in order to be observed has to be first experienced by an observer otherwise you would not know whether it is an object or not, it would be no experience. looking at atoms is like ‘looking at million of tv shows’ on a many screens being played out all at once. Atoms are events of time, all possible events.
These micro events are the discrete forms disclosing an innumerable set of objects. They are called “event-particles” and are the essence of an atom, in other words, atoms are essentially these particles. These particles are in parallel dimensions to one another, meaning that they have to be oriented in such a fashion so as to not directly interact, penetrate each other, but only indirectly interact by coming ever so close together, gravitational field, that they never touch but form an equilibrium of space. Space itself is the in-between these particles that hold them together but is also determined by them to hold them that way.
Space comes out of these particles as an event disclosing them both within the same event, that interaction is the event of time. Time is not something independent from the events that make it up, it is not just a schema holding a set of events, it is identical, and is these events themselves. The events themselves presuppose time as a principle disclosed within them. Relativity states different event, different time, or as they put it, different place, space, different time. But location is again one of those qualities of the event.
The way planets are formed mimics the nature of how atoms take on an event, the difference between the planet and the atoms they are supposedly made out of is their immediacy in time. One is taken from the shortest most minute state of time, the other is taken from a much more larger stretch of time, “taking a long time” state of time. The conception of planets is more general in time, bigger therefore takes longer, smaller therefore faster, this process goes infinitesimally and somewhere in this continuum is the present for consciousness, but if we go outside the present, or what can be conceivably be seen within the same framework, then physics of reality changes; first, the same reference frame disclosing a set of objects limited to each other, finite objects, changes into an elongated stretch of spacetime, the conception is not stable with the speed of light but changes into a wormhole like duration stretch of time.
Planets by nature exhibit fish lens like physical form
It is not that all these objects are in nothing, like they are in space, but rather it is the nothing, the void, that is in these objects, this is why we are able to enter an object, the void is the infinite dimension of consciousness zooming into and out of something. For example, you can land on the plant, and theoretically you can enter a molecule of its material, etc. The atom is said to be infinitesimally small is because the void is the motion where consciousness can enter into the dimension of object, that the atom is precisely the dimension that the consciousness enters by void.
When you leave out the planet, and the planets that form a solar system, and the motion of going further away from these objects accelerates faster and faster, the rate at which object come to form clusters increases and this therefore increases the conception of the size of stars. We are told the more outer space we go in the universe, the bigger the stars become, there are stars billion and billion the sizes of our star in the mildly way galaxy.
These super massive giant stars are not an individual star, but the light culminated together from an infinite number of stars to form a super massive light, which from a certain distance away from feels very hot and warm, and so the observer translates that into being the same star, but in actuality the observer has accelerated so fast to the speed of light, that is why they call it the “light” speed, you start seeing the extension of the reference frame filtered with what appears to be stars whizzing by.
Eventually during this light speed process, the phenomenon of “time dilation” begins to be observed, which is when within the space between stars becomes to warp to show a difference in the time elapsed between the measure of two clocks, or any object with a certain duration length of time. In other words, you start seeing different time frames, different periods of time, different ages, different points in history, or whatever call it, just means that time no longer forms a continuity of the same duration but becomes consisted of parallel events each with their own different length of time.
The “black hole” phenomenon is “a break in the spacetime fabric”, which simply means that the observer is viewing through one of these warps of spacetime to reveal a passage of nature into a another period of time, or a time frame, but because these two time frames are parallel, they are mediated by the black hole, which is an equilibrium in space, not of objects like a planet to a star within the same gravitational space field; but rather a black hole is an equilibrium between two events in time- a break between two events.
One event is excluded from another, meaning they do not directly interact, they do not touch, or are not even in the same space, going directly through a black hole would simply dismantle the object in the transition because it is not a spatial domain, it is a purely temporal, or rather of pure time, the object in a space realm outside a time period it does not belong to would have to have had the same events as the time it is not part of. There are certain events that must necessarily happen, or an object must go through, in order for it to be considered of the same time period.
The speed of light is always happening in space, this process is disclosed by a black hole as a singularity. It is not the case that someone reaches the speed of light, but rather conjoin with the speed of light, reaching the speed of light is equal to joining an event in the universe that is already there. The level of the speed of light on its own, consists of infinity bearing an indeterminate principle, everything and anything is there. But when we bring in the motion of the observer in the state known as the “speed of light”, than consciousness begins to pick out time periods in which it can observer. The infinity begins to develop particular shape. The infinity is not something we are trying to get at, but it is already the predicate.
Objects cannot physically enter from a different time period to another without having gone through certain amount of time. It is impossible to directly go through a black hole because disclosed within a black hole is an infinitely dense singularity, or a process of motion going at the speed of light. It is going so fast that a single object simply trying to enter would not be able to catch up, it would simply be broken into pieces.
These very external outer extremities of the sphere disclosing an event, or a certain duration of time, the event horizon is where the black hole is, which is the point of interaction between two parallel events, when we come very close to the black hole, the object warps along the curvature of the other most layer of space disclosing one event abs not another. Although you cannot physically enter through it, one object cannot physically enter through a black hole into another period of time. It is spatially impossible to enter through a black hole because in the black hole is a singularity going at the speed of light. But if the observer goes at the speed of light they become identical with the singularity and hence enter the black hole.
We do not have to be going at the speed of light in order to perceive a black hole, they can be seen from earth, but they are seen as very far away and distant objects in space. For example, the first picture of the black hole consists of thousands and thousands of pictures being taking of the same location in space, eventually the resolution captures the black hole at the far distance, captures the light emanating from it, and transfers it into pixels. If the observer goes at the speed of light they would be approaching the black hole and eventually would be identical with it, would be identical with the event horizon, a stretch extending light wavelength.
Joining the stream
, unless the object reaches the speed of light, which at that point the object is identical with the singularity and enters an infinitesimal wormhole, a duration where all the “stars are whizzing by”, and only at this speed it can enter a different time period because it actually went through the time necessary to reach that point in time. However it is very difficult to go at the speed of light, in fact it is proposed to be impossible. If no physical object can go at the speed of light, or at least as far as we know that no object can, what is the other method of conceiving a different period of time. Or how can two total different periods of time interact with one another?
We said that a physical object cannot go at the speed of light, but we never said that a non-physical object cannot go at the speed of light. A non physical object can go at the speed of light, an abstract object, like an event, or thought and a consciousness, theoretically can conceive the speed of light. If a mental process is able to conceive the speed of light it is able to determine into being time dilation, and theoretically can perceive through a black hole opening in spacetime to view a different dimension. An advanced rational race may be very far from us in terms of spatial extension, this is because the time it takes for a warm to reach a mammal and for a mammal to reach man, the heavenly bodies themselves have migrated further and further into space.
As time is proceeding forward and evolution is happening and advancing, the spatial extension wherein this development resides is being stretched further and further into space, so that by the time a bacteria is a man, the position of the earth and the planet and the galaxy is not in the same place. This is happening simultaneously in relative distance to all other possible and parallel universes. This simultaneity in space makes the object within one event in time very unattainable by other objects at a different event belonging to a different period of time. But in between these events belonging to parallel universes, there are different mental developments of observers, and some observers became so rationally advanced, they are able to think at the speed of light. They do not necessarily move at the speed of light but they are able to think at that level, this means that they can remain in their respective dimension, but be able to peak through and perceive another.
These beings have been famously called the “greys”. These beings are just advanced enough to be able to witness and see the spacetime continuum at the speed of light and pick out particular events in those continuum and watch what goes on there. It is entirely possible through this theory we described that an advanced human being at a later period of time, is watching this particular past in history, watching it through a black hole. These advanced beings have been able to reach the speed of light with their minds so they are looking at different time periods, they cannot directly interact with them physically, they cannot just enter it, otherwise their body would be disfigured by the rate at which the photons are moving, but their mind is conceiving it.
In their eyes is the fabric of spacetime at the speed of light, they observer different parallel time frames.
There has been a point in human history where ancient humans developed an encounter with advanced humans through not a physical encounter, then not shaking hands, but through an abstract connection. The people of the past indirectly interact with the people of the future, this is how the past and future combine together to shape the present.
The epic of Gilgamesh
This is one out of the many interpretations. We will look at the story not as mere mythology but as a psychological account of the people at that time, in this way even though the events may not be exactly historically accurate in their context, we are taking them as literal accounts of an experience that is being told by ancient man. Moreover we are also adapting the method of looking at this story not merely as a myth, in terms of symbols and idols that represent a commonly shared meaning, but we are also taking this story literally as history and interpreting the mythological symbols as psychological or other words for real things today, like “bush” is equal to “drug”. In these older stories even though the rents are not exact and literal as we record recent history today, for example during 911; we have the exact date to the hour and minutes, the specific people involved, I.e., the name of the victims and the perpetrators, the location, country etc., in these older stories, like in Babylon time and even in Hinduism and Buddhism, the specific context of the history is irrelevant, instead they focus on the archetypal features taken from many specific events to explain and outline of their history. For example, it may not be a specific king, whether its Gilgamesh of some other kind of that era, nevertheless the events that happened are archetypal, they happened more than once, and characterize something about human nature.
Enkidu is the animal side, the natural, or id side of Gilgamesh, which is the ego and superego. Early in the story both men contend with each other and develop companionship becoming friends. A psychological interpretation is that this is man learning how to deal with his animal nature, and how that animal nature becomes civilized. In the context of the epic, Enkidu tames the dictatorship side of Gilgamesh by challenging him and showing him an equivalent competitor; while Gilgamesh is the superego side of Enkidu, his introduction to society and civil life, Enkidu is brought into society to find his superego, Gilgamesh, and he is first turned from a pure brute into a civilian by having sex with a prostitute, she tames his animal nature by satisfying his sexual desire, through this sexual experience Enkidu is said to be “awakened” and his mind made clear. The story is written as if it is in Gilgamesh’s own words, as if the king himself recounts it.
Gilgamesh thinks ahead of his death, the meaning of his life.
Gilgamesh is told by the elder men of his kingship that he must relay on the survival skills of Enkidu, his wilderness counterpart, to defeat the monster he is about to go face, Humbaba’s.
the two heavily armed heroes step outside the seven-bolt gate of Uruk and set off on the wild. They do not stop to eat until they have walked twenty leagues. In three days, they cover 150 leagues (450 miles); it would take an ordinary man three weeks to walk so far.
Enkidu urges Gilgamesh on whenever his courage flattens, assuring him that they can defeat Humbaba. When Enkidu hesitates, Gilgamesh reassures him that he is a good warrior, that when the time for battle comes he will not lose, and that they will stand and fight together. This is the ego and the id contending together in the struggle to survive death.
Shamash, similar to the modern Arabic word for the “sun”, is the sun god in the story, which is associated with light and wisdom. Humbaba, whom Shamash detests, is associated with darkness and evil. This “monster” is equivalent to what in the modern psychoanalysis of Carl Jung is called the “shadow”. Gilgamesh is essentially confronting his shadow, shining light on to it, brining his unconscious fear of death into light, confronting his own mortality.
The battle with humbaba, for our purpose, the monster or the shadow of the individual, it begins off as confusion and hysteria, then Gilgamesh and Enkidu reassure each other they can prosper through it, and with the help of some external divide force, in those chase shamash, the health of the sun, they overcome the monster and it becomes in their mercy. But even when the shadow is in their hands, it plays minds games with them, it pleads that if it is spared it will become servant of the ego, but Enkidu quickly restates to Gilgamesh to end the monster once and for all, but Gilgamesh thinks that Enkidu might be jealous that he will be replaced, however he admires cruelty and listens ending humbaba. This process of killing their monster is to make a name for themselves in the world .
They interacted through planets that are capable of opening dimension in the mind.
Galgamish the “bush” dmt
The river wormhole
Galgamish tale past people encounter with the future people