A curve is the outline of a point
There are no perfectly straight lines in nature because a straight line is intercepted by any two points which makes it into a definite length, since a straight line is a measure of a definite length, even if the line is endless the boundaries which it breaches beyond to be endless would be the site of points which limit it into a definite length. And so if a line is made up of infinite points, only two of which are at the end extremes disclosing the length dense of infinite points. The line is dense with so many points the points become indiscernible from each other and make a continuity. The line is not infinite in length, being endlessly long, because it’s limit would be the conception disclosing it as infinitely long line. Mathematically this means the boundaries of the two points at the very end of the line are curves, The point is always an indivisible part of the line because A) lines are made up of points, and B) in order to make a line you have to begin from a point. Try to draw a line without starting from a point? It is impossible to draw a line without first starting from a point on a paper than dragging it accords to make a line. Two points at the end of a line is the recognition that the line is made out of points, and it is also the outline of the line. Even if the line in and of itself is endlessly long, the conception that conceives it as endlessly long is limited in seeing the line as endlessly long, and so the conception itself limited it into a definite length, the two end points at the exterminates of the line and simultaneously at the exterminates of the conception, the two points themselves have a curve as their outline, therefore the limit of a line is always the curve, or that a line is always curved in relation to the observer.
In this way a straight line is never ultimately straight, the limit of it is that it is always curved. This is why in nature we notice the observation that every certain length is curved, warped, stubbed etc., no man has a perfect nose, people have non-symmetrical faces etc.,
What we also observe in nature is that there is no single curve on its own disconnected from a figure it belongs to. In other words a curve is an outline of a figure also means that a figure is an aspect the curve is part of, or rather is an abstraction of. This is the opposite of what logic truly begins with because the materialist takes for granted that matter is already present as a ready made world and therefore takes those preconditions are readily there, but logic begins off with itself as never given and having no subject matter of itself, and from there proceeds to unpack and consider every possible scenario that it can take, and it is those discoveries about itself that are taken by the materialist as the readily available facts in the world, without acknowledging that they are themselves influx, never given only in a certain way, and are objective only in the fact that they have been generated into being from a moment when they were not-being. Understanding that there is an inherent indeterminacy in logic does not mean that there are no objective and universal rules. The reasons why something got here are the precondition for the next action. The empirical science is therefore only reactive to whatever it is confronted and it cannot forecast phenomena.
Point, line, circle Dimension
3.3.The Geometry of Logic The modern notion of Spacetime continuum appropriates the ancient concept known as the Euclidean space, which describes space as consisting of three-dimensional points. The modern notion, the “Minkowski continuum”, is an appropriation of the Euclidean space to describe time (Uoregon, relativity) Time is associated with one dimension and space with three dimensions, and together they constitute a four dimensional continuum. In geometry the triangle is the first rectilinear figure that all other figures can be reduced to it. The next fundamental rectilinear shape is the square and so on. The first curvilinear shape is the circle (Meta.V.6.Ross) These qualifications of the shapes are not random but are fundamentally logical and fundamentally serve as the basis for the understanding that space is three dimensional and time is one dimensional. The internal relations of the plain, line, and circle are the one-dimensional determination of time. The triangle is the next logical form of thought after the circle. In basic geometry, the triangle is the first rectilinear shape whereas the circle is the first curvature shape. In geometry the measurements of curvature shapes are more basic than rectilinear shapes because there are no angles of measurement, but only degrees (Meta.V.6.Ross ). For example, curvature shapes only consist of obtuse and no acute or right angles. The reason why space takes on three dimensions is based on the nature of logic that gave rise to the circle. The principle of identity, the principle of difference, and the principle of opposition are not devoid of any form because in fact they take on geometric shapes (Categories.2.7.Edghill). They are not just empty propositions but are primary actions of geometry. The principle of identity defines the self-identical determination, the principle of difference defines the determination of externality, and the principle of opposition define the determination of their relation (Philosophy of Nature, 199) . For Aristotle, the universe is spherical because the circle is the form that captures the fundamental logical relation, in other words, the golden ratio(On The Heavens.II.2.Stocks) . For example, let us ask the basic question; what exactly is a circle? The making of a circle
The formulation of the circle consists of three steps: (1) The first determinations making the circular form are the plane and the period, both of which are necessary for each other. The period is the self-identical determination and has no difference within itself. This quality of the period makes it distinguishable from the plane. The plane is the external determination and is pure differentiation. The externality of the plane recognizes the identity of the period and the identity of the period recognizes the externality of the plane. The inverse relation between the two determinations constitutes them as different forms (Meta.VII.6. Ross)(2) With the identification of each other and therefore the reaffirmation of the nature of each through the other, we have that each determination adopts the quality of its negation determination. When identity takes on externality, the identity becomes external from itself while remaining self-identical, so that it becomes the identity extended and stretched. So the period becomes stretched and extended as the line. The relation of the period to the plane is the line, which is the first determination of the period in the plane (Philosophy of Nature, 197)(3) When the self-identity of the period derives externality and therefore extends outside itself while remaining identical, i.e. the line, the difference in negation to that, the plane, develops identity of its own externality through the line. As the line is extending outside itself while remaining self-identical, the plane develops the identity of the line while remaining external. The line relapses into the external identity of the plane by forming a loop connecting to itself enclosing the externality of the plane. The circle is the enclosing of the externality of the plane with the identity of the line. The circle is the self-relation where form can be filled in. This is why it is the universal form for the Greeks (Timaeus). —–#31-Point, line, circle The laws of thought operate accordingly to what pierce calls deduction and induction. Unlike the way they were used in the first chapter, pierce intends those terms to be universal mechanics of thought. Dedication is necessary because the proportion of the general idea is divided into particular expressions of it each of which contradict each other to explain what the general idea. Induction comes after by making each particular expression contradict each to formulate the general idea. Both deduction and induction operate indivisibly as the efficient causation for thought. Thoughts are physical in natureIn order to really grasp how the laws of thought actually are the notion of change in nature, it is important to point to specific results in the concrete nature that is predicates of the laws. Space, time and matter are concrete results of the laws of thought- as well as deduction and induction is how the laws of thought operate to make such notions. Space is self-externality and so it presupposes the identity as the negation. Space is pure negation of the excluded middle. Time is the identity of self-activity, and it is the truth- the negation of the negation- of the excluded middle. Matter is the identity of self-activity with self externality, in unity they are dualistic. This is light at the very foundational level. Light itself takes on a form of self relation as external from itself, and so it becomes a three dimensional sphere. For example, photons portray both wave-particle duality. This is the form of the universe and what is meant when said that the world is necessarily spherical. This form is both infinitesimal and infinite meaning that it is both the smallest possible point and the largest possible, at this stage of the universe, there is no distinction between the microscope and the macroscopic. When we look at what is meant by a simple circle, a circle is simply 1) . A point is the form of time, an instance denotes it is being there and present in a specific and particular manner. 2) that point in space is a line because it is self external; _______ The point outside of itself maintains its form of being there, that it is continuously identical with itself. 3) that line identifying with itself as relapsing into itself; (draw circle with radius) (- ) The radius is simply the outline of the line continue with itself within a plain, such that the plain is limited to the line, and not only the line limited to the plain. And so the circle outlines the plain, circumvents it around the line, it becomes a line and a plain within a circle. As you can see any circle with a radius is precisely the relation of such logical laws. The laws of thought apply in every object, they are the first principles for any material substratum. Cone light If we look at the nature of light, the very basis of matter, we see that photons portray both wave and particle properties. This wave-particle duality is exactly this externalization of the logic described by the point, line, circle, it is there concrete manifestation. Light constitutes a cone like physical nature, because a cone is all at once a point, the outer most extreme tip of the cone, a line, or the circumference of the cone, extends from that point tip to circle, which is the base of the cone. A cone is a circle extended infinitely into a point
Dimensions The first dimension is marked off by the geometric space of the minimum number of coordinates needed to specify any point within it. Coordinate and figure can help us explain the complex unity between external and internal relation. The coordinate system and the figure are indispensable as they constitute the same logical activity of the presupposition of one to the other. The essential function of Coordinate is to exhibit the figure as activity of uniform duration which characterizes the object, the object being the basis distinction in the continuity of the duration. The object shows all the points of compiling the activity but the activity so long as it is the relation between the points is what identifies them. The object so far as it reveals the particular points, which are the sequences of change, of the activity is only revealed by the relation, the reason for the change, that can be divided into the points. The activity is complex because it contains different possibilities all sharing the same actuality. The points are only distinguished so far as they share the same relation, like the two points of a line are are only differentiated because they are at the end of the same line that reveals them as different ends, but the line so far as it is an extended point is disclosed by the two points such that they posit the line as the same extent. The point so far as it is determined away from itself to form the line is the same to say the line as a determinations extends to distinguish the points. No matter which way you look at it will always be a limited abstraction of the same unlimited activity whose reality is nevertheless the points the line and the conception of that which is the very unlimitedness of the activity in the first place. The fact about the nature of activity as object is that it is conceiving itself as it goes on, and as it goes on that is the conception for itself. This makes for science a difficulty because we think that we must work backwards from where the activity is conceiving itself to where it is still conceiving itself. But from where to where science must begin is not even the question, Science can only conceive what is already conceiving, it can only be the activity in absolute alignment with itself. How this actually looks like is that genetics is the activity forming each individual and the activities of the individual is possibility of the genetics. The activity makes the dimension the dimension makes the object. Dimension duration This is how the whole challenges the parts.into a unified whole that ensures all possibilities (add to spacetime curvature) When we make a line it is logical that we can make another of which the relation between the two are the sides forming the triangle. Dimension is wholly formed by the logical relation between the prior relation, the relation of the relation forms the object:
The first four spatial dimensions, represented in a two-dimensional picture.1Two points can be connected to create a line segment.2Two parallel line segments can be connected to form a square.3Two parallel squares can be connected to form a cube.4Two parallel cubes can be connected to form a tesseract.The formation of higher dimensions relies on the fact that there is no strict distinction between the activity that forms the object and the object thata line has a dimension of one because only one coordinate is needed to specify a point on it Size, quantity, and alteration all characterize a quality taking up a Dimension in the universe. The notion of the dimension is not an abstract realm separate from other dimensions. It is separate in the sense that particular things involve different natures, it is not separate however in that they do not share a universal nature. This modern physics notion understands dimensions as independent realms. The idea that a quality takes up a dimension is one which merely refers to the particular nature of a object- or that a dimension is an asbraction of its particuality. Every object in the universe do not exists independently from one another in such a way where they bear no relationship at all. When we see a small pebble on the ground in relation to a giant pinecone tree, what we are seeing is that both objects are occupying different dimensions. This in no way suggest that the tree and the rock bear no relationship, yet they both object occupy different size, quantity and alteration, and both bear different qualities. The experience of a tree is very much different then the experience of a rock, even though they occupy different dimensions within the same realm and the very much are a part of the same landscape and experience the same seasons for example. The importance of dimension allows us to understand the relationships things have with each other that expound begins abstraction of certain relationships. For example, a man has a relationship with the tree because it bears him fruit, however the tree is also an environment for trillions of microorganisms that occupy entirely different dimension than the mind, the tree is perhaps an avenue between these dimensions in space, however it is also a gateway of dimension in time, because the tree was there way before the man, and perhaps after, this means that the time in which the tree operates is different than the time the man operates. The man has shorter life span, therefore more things happen within a shorter period of time, whereas time for a tree is much slower, it is prolonged and extended, more things that are greater happened within a greater timespan. Size, quantity, and alteration are characteristics belonging to the substrate. The quality of the substrate is the particular kind of form it assumes for its essence. The essence of the object takes on a particular dimension in nature. Circle is the basic form of consciousness disclosing the object The Furthest point away from itself The furthest point away from consciousness in its cycle , is what it is not, is the state of nothing, but not absolute nothing, as the atheist say when someone dies nothing happens for ever. The state of nothing is the moment consciousness goes furthest away from itself, or inversely is a return into its most primal pure and unconditioned self, this is what it is, it’s quality is to maintain itself as nothing so as to conceive something, fill that void with a conception. At the instant of nothing is at the same time the first moment of the first being, which appears for consciousness as a self-identical point in a void plain. Once the existence of the first energy point is recognized in a void, there develops a continuity between the point and its conception, which so far is part of the plain, from a two-dimensional perspective just appears as a line. But from a third dimension appears as a tunnel. This points to the important of dimensions in the realm of consciousness because dimensions are simply the perspectives or the point of view of consciousness, which so far they exhibit level of complexity indicates precisely the level of sophistication of the perspective. This is why we have in ontology a relative qualitative difference between world views, that some world views are more developed than others because this is in some part indicative of a fundamental property of consciousness as a substance in nature. From a three-dimensional point of view,
It’s like seeing through a light beam, but that extension is only an abstraction part of a sphere. (Add looking inside a sphere image) The first recognition of a point and adopting that as an identity forming a line from the point to the conception which is somewhere potentially anywhere on the plain, and that extension now disclosed the plain with the recognition that it can possibly be anywhere is the basic structure of consciousness, in a primal sense is the fish eye lens consciousness. It becomes a relation between the conception and the object, that is what a line is. This first point is the electron electronic macro- scale is the idea that the inverse of an electron at the microscopic level is an infinitely large macro-scale electron that is more developed in the future. The latter is the final outcome in space and time of the former, which is only the seed, the potential for its growth into its more advanced state.
A universe is the more advanced form of the electron. When a consciousness goes furthest away from itself, or away from what it was in a particular condition, for example at the moment of death it leaves its particular circumstances, part of which is the body, it expands outwards until the universe becomes an undistinguished point flash in a void. This is at the same time when the conception develops the inverse determinations and recognizes its first object and enters upon it slowly differentiating into a complexity of different events, here we have the development of the atom taking on the various chemical forms along. This first instance we geometrically call the point in a plain, in subatomic physics, it is the electron, and in cosmology it is the universe from a very infinitesimal point of view. We normally say that the atom is the smallest unit in size but size is at variance from a relative model, meaning that there is two inverse properties to any single one variant, and it is this dual feature of an object that quantum mechanics identifies as “entanglement“. this idea will be explored in greater details in other section, but for the purpose of this point, entanglement is the idea that any single object observed has two opposite moments in time, which it is a transition from one to the other, is the continuity, what we call a “wormhole”, a very misinformed notion in the sciences.
And there two moments in time collide to form the object at the present, this process is called atom collision. Collateral