Section 80 (last updated 06.13.2021)
“you are the gleam in your fathers eyes”
You are in the mind of your son, as the phrase goes the son is in the “gleam of his fathers eyes”, he is his potential, observing behind the scenes, waiting to emerge into existence to carry out the task the father has necessarily left behind, and so as the father goes, he is a finite being, but his generation is eternal, so on it goes.
Sexual reproduction
Pierce Word nature
“The word natura evidently must originally have meant birth; although even in the oldest Latin it very seldom bears that meaning. There is, however, a certain subconscious memory of that meaning in many phrases; just as with words from there is the idea of springing forth, or a more vegetablelike production, without so much reference to a progenitor. Things, it may be, spontaneously; but nature is an inheritance. Heredity, of which so much has been said since 1860, is not a force but a law, although, like other laws, it doubtless avails itself of forces. 9 But it is essential that the offspring shall have a general resemblance to the parent, not that this general resemblance happens to result from this or that blind and particular action. No doubt, there is some blind efficient causation; but it is not that which constitutes the heredity, but, on the contrary, the general resemblance. So, then, those naturalists are right who hold that the action of evolution in reproduction produces real classes, as by the very force of the words it produces natural classes. (121)”
Asexual reproduction
(Add wormhole)
We are “in a womb” is phrase referring to the idea that the duration of our life events and our body exists within our potential, which so far is abstract, exists in the mind as thought, and not somewhere within a physical domain. Physically things can contain other things smaller in size and mass, like a literal “womb” contains the baby inside the stomach of the mother, but figuratively, a womb may be any abstract dimension which is not limited to the physical contents it discloses, like for example, the mind is a womb that contains perception.
Perception is not an operation happening somewhere outside the mind, because the information by way of light particles is being received into the brain via the organs of sensation, vision. . (Add Hegel discrete and continuous quantity) how each object is discrete, disembodied as the peculiar thing and not anything else held in its isolation, is the skill of the abstract domain, as the boundaries between objects is not so easily distinguished if we take the totality of qualities that combine together to formulate the objects. If ultraviolet radiation is viewed in conjugation with the ordinary heat, natural light, etc., objects that are ordinarily viewed as discrete, now formulate a continuity of energy . but the continuity is the connection and dependence of these objects on each other by the conception.
Womb
(Add to section in matrix) The expression “you are the gleam in your fathers eyes” speaks volumes concerning.
The rate of birth to death ratio from a subjective stand point appears to be scattered. From a specific position in the population it seems that there are no connections between someone being born and someone else die other than the fact that they occur universally to everyone at some point. The death to birth ratio 4:2 (4 birth every minute 2 deaths every minute) in the lowest terms is 2:1. Objectively the birth death-rate constitutes a matrix series. In the same way the ratio of cell production and lost is approximately 2million:5million (2 million produced 5 million lost per second (4:10 equivalent ratio) for every 5 lost 2 million are replaced. This is the steady rate give or take at which the body continuous producing cells until death. The human species as a whole go through akin steady rate of births to death.
The life events of individuals are the thoughts of the genetic information that produces the birth during the death of the individual. The entirety of individual life events are disclosed by the conception and conceived by the genetic information of the development of the embryo. The maturity of the embryo to the fetus is instantaneously occurring with the progression of the individuals lifespan.
Evolution works precisely in this manner, what is being passed down are the mistakes the offspring sublated as knowledge from the parents, as whitehead says “history is a series of mistakes” (human soul find in teds course kit). This is why we not only have one being, one human, through history but species, series of individuals.
an organizational structure in which two or more lines of command, responsibility, or communication may run through the same individual.
late Middle English (in the sense ‘womb’): from Latin, ‘breeding female,’ later ‘womb,’ from mater, matr-‘mother.’ (Add here the idea as the womb, the spherical form.)
The atom is the matrix of its form, the form constitute the dimension of the matrix.
Self-reproduction
In the process of self-reproduction, the passage for reemergence into life is inseparable from the physiology of the organism and part of the lifespan of the organism. At this level there is also intimate relationship between environment and organism such that you do not find one where the other is not because the environment is part of the very reproductive powers of the organism itself. In the process of self reproduction the organism never leaves the confines of the womb for the reemergence of its function. The main function of asexual reproduction is DNA replication occurs within the disclosure of the same womb of which there are two organism enclosed now in the same womb. In other words the multiplication of the organism occurs within the confines of the same womb.
In the process of self reproduction the organism never leaves the womb during the entire maturity if its lifespan.
In asexual reproduction the separation of the cell is only to reenforce the addition of the single parent cell from the start. Whereas in sexual reproduction, the coming together of the cells is done for the reinforcement of the unity. The difference between both cases is the disclosure of the womb wherein the DNA is replicated.
the process of cell division is the process of dimension generation. The bundle is of passages of nature.
In mitosis and meiosis the process of division all concur within an ever present unity. Looking at the process as a whole, we see that there is the same retraction motion from the plasma membrane down to the nucleus. What is happening in the process of cell division is that the nucleus begins off as a jumbled sphere of “uncondensed” chromosomes.
Throughout the phases the chromosomes constitute a pattern where each individual separates itself into two strained on each end of the kinetochore microtubule. In the last telophase the now separate daughter chromosome constitute two different jumples of chromosomes like one found at the interphase. The last phase is called telo-phase because it is the start from which aim can once again reinitiates process. While this process is occurring the cell as whole maintains the same muscular contraction throughout every part. Physically the cell moves maintains the same motion throughout the varying changes occurring of its qualities.
The aim of asexual reproduction is for cell division- from one derive two. The logic of asexual reproduction is for the one sell to produce the probability of this and that, one and another.
This is one journey of entrance into being. Individuals, the sperms, meet a vessel, the egg, and one entrance upon inhabiting the other, and from that a set of transformational forms unfold multiplying together each fulfilling a specific role in relation the the aim of the whole, and fulfill a form greater than each individual particulars that make it up. When one life dies and enters car into nothing and everything, a new one energies into birth within a new dimension that transforms a reality before it.
The aim of sexual reproduction is for two to reproduce one. Whereas in sexual reproduction that one off spring carried out from the parents is either or gender, either this or that.
Sexual reproduction presupposes asexual reproduction because the body which enacts sexual reproduction is constituted by cells that primarily reproduce asexually. Yet the aim of sexual reproduction is to reproduce out of two one, the initial place whereby asexual reproduction begins with one and make two.
Sexual reproduction is aiming to actualized something initiated by asexual reproduction. The confines that sexual reproduction occurs within are disclosed by the confines of self-reproduction. In other words the process of asexual reproduction is the dimension which contains the process of sexual reproduction.
Sexual reproduction is asexual reproductions way of producing itself
(Add to asexual and sexual reproduction, and whether we are the whole of our cells or the cells is our whole because they make us)
We say that sexual reproduction is more advanced form of reproduction than asexual because it comes later in time after it, but we forget that one is the expression of the other. With the exception of the egg and sperm cells every cell in the human body is asexually reproduced. If sexual reproduction is more advanced in the sense that we identify it with higher mammals, why does it at a microscopic level result in a body that mainly consists of asexual reproducing cells, that is how the body is maintained as the kind of body capable of sexual reproduction.
consists mainly of asexual reproducing cells. The organism that is product of sexual reproduction consists entirely of asexual cells. This question is not only meant to suggest that sexual reproduction is the way asexual reproductions maintains, reenforces, itself, but that what we mean by more advanced relates to the fact that sexual reproduction is the expression of asexual sexual that it is a determination subsequent to it.
Sexual reproduction
Self reproduction is the inwards contradiction the object possess in relation to its conditions. Sexual reproduction is the outwards contradiction. The object turns into itself by making it self. This division between the objects that are each other is the inward contradiction derived from the outwards. Self reproduction is the outwards process derived from the inwards.
The ethical process prior to self-consciouses reason takes a biological form. The process of biogenesis indicates that the process of reproduction first arises as self-reproduction. Define: Reproduction is the biological process by which new individual organisms – “offspring” – are produced through the process of contradiction. This contradiction first happens in the individual organic entity. This entity possess the means for its own contradiction within itself, which results in productionary results.
The contradiction within the self presupposes a set of relations in the self. Sets of relations are normally seen as being independent to be that relation, that is separate, without first knowing their relation so as to assert the difference. The relation is independent in itself. This separateness is its own self, that is, the unity in its relations. It’s own inner means of independence produces its outer expression of the contradiction. This is seen in the process of autopoesis. Define:
1. “Autopoiesis” (from Greek αὐτo- (auto-), meaning “self”, and ποίησις (poiesis), meaning “creation, production”) refers to a system capable of reproducing and maintaining itself.
The process of asexual reproduction involves the coming of the contradiction to independence. This is done so for the necessity of the contradiction to solve itself, and in the resolution, develops the further contradictions etc.
The contradiction and the resolution presuppose each other as one, in the same ways the laws of attraction and repulsion in the formulation of matter presuppose each other. The only difference is that matter has sustained itself by means of such quantum laws so is static in its being. It is static becouse it is done for the further development to its more qualitative form, that is, organic life. The process of asexual reproduction is matter coming to be conscious. It’s consciousness is the result out of its logical necessity. Once asexual reproduction emerges from the contradiction sustaining its existence, it turns onto itself by creating itself. This results in its next ethical phase.
This is the basis to self-reproduction in the organism. The concept of asexual reproduction characterizes this. The contradiction is solved and thus the process of sexual production energies in the organism that turns itself to another. This multiplication in being originates from the laws of attraction and repulsion constituting the basis to all inorganic matter.
The contradiction in the organism produces a contradiction in the other, both now culminate to form a higher set of relations so as to formulate the ethical in the rational development of organic life. The process of sexual reproduction follow the same laws of nature governing the universe, that is, the same set of logical order. This explains that the process of sexual reproduction is the asexual production in its sublated ethical form. The process of genetic diversity emerges as the fundamental basis to life.
In this production now again turns onto itself with the process of sexual production. This produces a further contradiction by means of diversity. Organic diversity is the move to the contradiction that is dynamic, the laws of attraction in the working of repulsion. Such laws are now not static but development in a logical direction that must necessitate a higher qualitative form.
Dynamic in this sense involves development directed towards some resolution. It is logic in its organic form, that is, the concrete to the abstract. The resolution itself follows the long chain of logical development in the organism. It’s logical necessity is the resolution. The resolution is this qualitative development in the diversity among organic life through the sublated version of sexual reproduction. Diversity produces a set of complex contradictions that each resolve a higher ethical form.
Sexual reproduction in mammals produce genetic variations that enables a higher sense of consciousness. The chimpanzee is always studied as the more conscious of all animals aside from the human being. This is due to its species of being a mammal. The quastion now remains to what specifically in the monkey made it greater than the consciousness of an elephant? Surely the latter possess greater genetic potential? This raises the next logical necessity to organic diversity. Because organic forms of life are dynamic towards development to some end, this end itself necessities reason.
The case of sexual reproduction reaches its most diverse form in the sense of mammals. This diversity is not seen in the quantitative sense, where animals reproduce in larger number, such as insects. Nor is is the qualitative difference between animals is determined in great size, like the dinosaurs. Diversity, as opposed to the Darwinian use of it, must assume variation in the qualitative development in the species. The qualitative difference in the species takes a moderate concrete form. In what form is moderation achieved in the qualitative difference between species? Species that emerge out of the process of sexual reproduction achieve a certain kind of quality.
A natural entity arising from sexual preproduction is diverse as its species. That each individual living entity formulate its own species as as taking its particular form. That diversity among each species of fish is a diversity among species of fish, rather than the individual fish representing the species. The qualitative difference between species of animal is defined by the difference between species. The difference being the quality. That one individual shark cannot be distinguished from another individual shark, as both constitute that particular species. To be a particular species requires a group of living organism consisting of the same ability to exchange genes for inbreeding. Production for the same genes is the determining element that characterizes diversity among species. This however is the initial diversity, diversity in the universal sense.
There is only a qualitative difference between each living organism as species. There is no qualitative difference between species as each living organism, there is only a quantitive difference between each living organism. The qualitative difference is between the species, the quantitive difference is between each individual organism on the species. E.g, there is no difference between two dogs, but there is a difference between a dog and a fish etc. This is truth for the particular as the universal. Is it also truth for the universal as the particular? Each species of living organisms is distinguished by its qualitative difference, but how is the difference in quality determine the difference? The explicate notion is a given in genetic diversity, where each form of genetic variation produce a further complex form of variation.
The implicate notion that truly distinguish the qualitative difference is how each individual living organism is different among the same species. This makes no sense in species that arise out of self reproduction. Sexual reproduction produces diversity between each species, but does not produce diversity between individual organisms in the same species. Aside from the diversity in shape and size, which is the initial difference in the quantitive diversity achieved in the very primal stage of reproduction, I.e, self reproduction.
Diversity is achieved in the qualitative form in the sublated stage of reproduction, I.e, sexual reproduction. In the same way this difference is true between self-reproduction, and sexual reproduction, there must be the same difference between sexual reproduction and its sublation. What is the sublation of sexual reproduction? What is the determining element in the transition from sexual to the next form of production? The next form of production is present in the results out of sexual reproduction. The human species is necessitated by sexual reproduction, but is distinguished from every other species that produce sexually? This distinction in the difference arises as diversity in the particular that is the universal. In the human species, diversity is true in the individual difference between each individual in the species.
The human species is not only distinguished from every other species that produce sexually, each species that produce sexually is already distinguished from every other species by that factor, but the human species is also distinguished from every species in the fact that there is a distinction between each individual constituting the species. The species is now different from itself but the same as its difference. This is the distinction that distinguishes the human species from every other specie. Now emerges the sublation in diversity, one that conceives each individual entity to be the universal. In this transition, diversity takes on a higher form. This diversity is no longer in the organic process of sexual reproduction, but rather in the process of a higher qualitative form of production.
The latter takes on the form of self-consciousness, the results comes out of the difference between the same individual in the species. Consciousness is achieved with the realization that sameness involves difference. This consciousness however is produced by the conditions necessitating itself. Such conditions is the development in tools. The latter is production outside the organic form. Production takes on a consciouses form. Consciousness is the resolution to each difference between species of sexual reproduction. The qualitative difference between each new species out of sexual production, is that each different production within the same form of production produces the next different in production. This is the dialectical process in the development of consciousness, that being the next qualitative resolution in the process of evolution.
Sexual reproduction serves as necessity, consciousness serves as universality. Each of which presuppose the other for existence. In monkeys for example, its qualitative developmental took form in the set of social relations it achieved. The monkey is a social animal, and it’s social sense achieved a higher form of consciousness that enabled the use of productionary forces outside the genetic sphere. Monkeys began to appropriate tools to reproduce in the most basic way. The use in tools divides monkeys into the human being. Division in this sense involves addition, multiplication etc. Our ancient Ancaster made this development in the use of tools which developed the human hand, which culminated in the rest of the genetic formulation to the human body today. This is the precondition to kant’s pragmatic predisposition. Humans live among their ancestors as the developed link.
In the same way asexual reproduction turns into sexual production, creating the next right circumstances for its highest formulation, that is, the mammal. The mammal develops into the productionary forces that are the sublated version of sexual reproduction, and thus the next dialectical stage to development. The technical predisposition resultes in the pragmatic predication. The use of tools by the hand develops enough consciousness that enables the break towards becoming a Human being. The latter term is scientific because it is universal and now applies to any being able of reaching self-consciousness. The transition from the technical to the pragmatic predisposition, enables the basic move towards self-consciousness.
The need for further production beyond the tool enables the species to turn onto itself, that is, human beings began to use other human beings as tools. This is self consciousness in its basic form as the human being now sees itself in the other, and makes the other do what it’s self does in production. This creates the first social bond. This produces the contradiction between the same species, the species itself now is an inversion. The complete opposite of itself as itself. This complete opposition now develops a unity. This is the move towards the moral predisposition.
Now the latter is the social bond as sublation. In the same way sexual diversity develops the means of production outside the genetic and organic sphere, the pragmatic develops the means of production outside the subjective sphere and enabled an enlarged universal view humankind took to itself. The pragmatic predisposition created what we today understand as countries. Such social relations are the extension of the productanry forces developed from the pragmatic predisposition to the moral. The moral predisposition is when the species now treats it self under laws of freedom.
This is the basic resolution to consciousness leading the species rather than their productionary forces. The latter remains in its development, but now guided by self- consciousness.
Reproduction is a fundamental feature of all known life; each individual organism exists as the result of reproduction. There are two forms of reproduction: sexual and asexual.
the ethical determining the rational makes no sense, if we don’t also see how the ethical at its basis is rational, what it means to be rational in the most basic sense is to be ethical. That is why social animals are considered the more developed version out of non social animals in some evolutionary sciences. To be fully rational is to be ethical in being reasonable/rational. the latter is the idea the article elucidates without explaining why it is elucidated. The article takes the ethical to produce the rational without first understanding how the ethical at its basis is necessarily rational. For example, epistemology presupposes ontology, and ontology itself necessarily involves ethics, and is also rational.
Ontology being ethical does not mean it is determined by some specific ethics or ethical standard; it just means that it is virtuous in being rational, or rather virtue is the skill of what it means to be rational, or rather determinate, orderly, and consciousness, aware or knowing , . Ethics taken as virtue is the rational as its best, this is a technical definition of the term. Ethics does not proceed anything, it is the thing itself in its best form, or better form. There already first has to be something for it to either be ethical or not. In the equation, there has to be something prior to ethics, insofar as to derive epistemology.
They see episiotomy as being only rational and not ontology. Ethics always presupposes an ontology.
(Name) takes universal to mean every particular itself is the universal, it fails to conceive the idea of development in science, which sees that each particular itself is in a different level in being universal, that is, not ever particular is the universal in the same way. The task of science is to find the set of particulars, or the one particular, that is itself the universal. This also includes knowledge about every other particular, as contributing to that one particular that is the universal. Animals are seen as the particulars that are progressive to towers the one particular, that is, the human being.
With this evolution comes different levels of qualitative forms. Certain particulars are more qualitatively determined than others. The lizard is more qualitatively determined than the amphibian. The task of true universal ethical practice is to see how to treat each individual thing according to its need. How their difference involves their sameness
The above is an appropriation of Aristotelian ethics onto environmental ethics.
A developmental concept of consciousness-
when two or more unconscious entities work against each other in sublation, one necessaties the other in itself, by being consciousness of the other. Within two unconscious entities, one is always the oppiste of itself in the other. The opposing reality is its conscious form to its unconscious existence. For example, the human ego as consciousness in relation to its uncounsous mind is filstated by the sub-consciousness. This basic psychological process is the organic emancipation of Reason. This has a negative necessary unity with its opposing form, that is, the aspect of non-reason in the organic psychological development of consciousness.
These where once rationally developmental but no longer are. Sadasim is a survival mechanism in the early stages of the homosapian. For example, the homo-erectus mutilate animals remaining like the heart or the stomach, and turns those into necessary tools for better eating conditions. In the latter exists implicit psychological underpinnings that are always antagonistic in nature. An example is war, where “only” there, life is justified as more qualitative than other lives. But this antagonism cannot forget the consciouses development of mind, the progressive nature to reason, I.e. The positive dialectic. The latter for example constitutes outcomes of war tat are socially developmental to cultures.
Countries that seem to excel in the balance between war and its ethical conscouqances, seem to be more culturally and socially developed. This socialiety by its very nature is implicitly moral, even though it is explicitly immoral. The act of war is made to involve ethical conquancses for countries based on constitutional law. countries, e.g, the Middle East, still based on the legal code from religious moral conduct are not accustomed by the same ethical values. There values are less consciousness in this relation with the unconscious. Their psychological underpinnings enables only a lower form of ethical values. This is seen by contemporary events constituting the war between North America and the Middle East, this is an ethical conflict constituting extremes on the universal scale of ethics. The Universal in relation to its ethical content presupposes self-conscious Reason as its basis. The latter constitutes the standard by which development is determined.
The imbalacment in the development of reason originates in the organic nature of the organism. Embedded in its organic nature exists its dualistic nature. This dualism is universal to every concept of being and non-being, in the human case, the concept of non reason. This is is not a moralistic claim, in that, it should not be applied as a standard of moral judgments. The latter is the misapplication of reason in the moral actuality. The development in the moral activity is determined by the contradiction constituting the individual and the universal.
The ethical nature of the individual is the sublated version of itself at the universal level, their only difference is development. Individuality is constituted by development in the qualitative sense contrary to its initial meaning of the “individual” meaning one and not the many. Development in the qualitative sense occurs in the concrete nature of the entity, the entity is the manifestation of “quantum” into essence. Quantum is necassatied by the logical nature of reason into its essence. The later is the process of the result. Reality is this quantum development of essence, both require each other in the indivisible nature. This is seen in the laws of psychics, where space is indivisible to time. Quantum is indivisible from its essence in the same way as it is indivisible in matter. In fact, this essential form predicates the psychical in that it is the concrete outer manifestation of its essential form. Form is the essential property that defines its “extension”.
That extension in substratum makes no conceivable sense without form. Matter without form becomes a impossible for empiricism, because the notion of “extension” presupposes form as its primary truth. Empiricism rightly understood is the conception of form in extension. The latter is universal, the former is the particular. In what sense does extension take form? Why is form the defining factor for extension. Classical mechanics explains the physical aspect of the process extension takes towards form. Special relativity elucidates motion in matter. For example, the speed of light is measured by light. Light is matter in the universal sense because it takes on the physical properties that makes it the fasts form of motion. What seems like circular thinking in the mind is progress in reality. The contradiction in logic, is the resolution in the organic. Take light for example: According to the laws of thermodynamics, light is the transmission of energy from one source to the other. This transmission is explained by the concept of force (hegel on force). This however only explains the activity light portrays, without first explaining what light actually is. Light as quantum is matter as pure quality. Light is the pure quality of matter. The laws of thermodynamics state:
(Add here the giraffe generating like pixels)
The form of the relation between individuals is the idea. The idea is the matrix of group of individuals. The difference between one matrix and another is the dimension of the idea. The dimension is the measurable extent of the form is determined by the law of mind. We normally believe that we come out of the mothers womb and grow towards adulthood. But the purpose of birth is not merely for the conception of life because logically you are ultimately born to die. But that during the process of life the aim is to acquire the necessary knowledge to reenter the womb. The process of life is to go back to the womb because from there exists the potentiality.
The process is purely objective because the subjective character of the person dies but their experiences so far as inscribed in the genetics will reemerge again with the blossom of adulthood (Add here the process of sperm as the idea of man potential coming back into reality) Quantum dimensions do not exhibit a certain kind of order. Birth and death occur simultaneously. We know this to be true just from a statistical standpoint, that for every death there are 3 born. And we can assume that there are simultaneous deaths and births perhaps only milliseconds between them. In some sense the womb does not lie arbitrarily in the females abdomen, but the womb do far as the potential of man is a reemergence of a primary form. the womb becomes an objective reference point for the aim of man. It is in this sense that during life man is still in the womb.