Section 73 (last updated 4.29.2021)
“little” conceptions
( add to observable universe)
(Add to conception changes physicality)
“Bubble” universe
(add to multiverse) (add to wormhole section)
The physicality of abstract objects exhibits a “bubble” like nature where each object interacts as if soup bubbles bouncing off each other. The reason for this metaphor is because at the most basic quantum level, objects are not corruptible like they are in the macroscopic scale. At more microscopic levels objects are more difficult to break down, the more microscopic the more difficult to break down. So when we reach a degree where matter is not broken down by its interactions with other matter, it exhibits very strange forms of interactions that is inconsistent with how we perceive the interactions between things at our sensible level. A good example is the kind of events that happen in a dream.
In dreams we witness obscure physical interactions that we think will never happen in waking life. For example someone falling off high buildings experiences not the same distance that the height of the building necessarily brings, in a dream a 20 stories building feels like it’s less than 1 stories tall, or sometimes you fall and never reach the bottom. or someone getting hit by car just bounces off it like a balloon whereas in real life their bones would be broken and their flesh mutilated. Reason why in a dream physical interactions do not bring about the same result as in waking life is because it does not need to, the purpose for the physical interaction is different, for instance in a dream the events happening does not matter and is only used as a means to illicit some feelings and thoughts of meaning, events are changed by the mere change in thought in a dream. whereas in waking life your feelings and thought do not directly affect or alter the physical circumstances.
The most important thing in waking life is the events happening directly in front of your senses and thought along with emotions have a more indirect and long term effect behind the scenes that do not directly alter the physical circumstances of your current experience. For example, no matter how much you believe you will survive jumping off a mountain will cause death in real life, whereas in a dream the change in mood changes the situation of the event altogether.
The physicality perceived in dreams for example is closer to demonstrating the physicality of objects at more fundamental levels. The “bubble universe” theory unlike the “multiverse” concerns the physical composition as in the spatial nature of the universe at the most ultimate of degrees, whereas the multiverse concerns more the time or the formal side of the universe at the most ultimate levels.
The bubble universe theory offers an alternative view to the Big Bang theory, which states that at the beginning of the universe energy is dense, warm, compact, clustered and highly active. After expanding energy settled down to form all the stars and galaxies of the known universe. But the bubble universe idea makes its beginning before the “bang” per say and illustrate a picture of a vast, cold, empty space, and in that space appears universes that merge together forming new ones. There is implication that a universe emerges spontaneously and at an instant, like a bubble pops open, the opposite, a universe pops into being. However this is not exactly defined.
in the beginning was the vacuum. The vacuum simmered with energy (variously called dark energy, vacuum energy, the inflation field, or the Higgs field). Like water in a pot, this high energy began to evaporate – bubbles formed.
Each bubble contained another vacuum, whose energy was lower, but still not nothing. This energy drove the bubbles to expand. Inevitably, some bubbles bumped into each other. It’s possible some produced secondary bubbles. Maybe the bubbles were rare and far apart; maybe they were packed close as foam.
But here’s the thing: each of these bubbles was a universe. In this picture, our universe is one bubble in a frothy sea of bubble universes.
This conception of the universe as “bubbly” entirely changes our ordinary understandings about the physicality of our world. Ordinary laws of nature makes the universe appear as a linear and rudimentary set of stable actions and reactions maintaining each other in a cyclical and therefore predictable manner. However this kind of dynamics, although is ordinarily observed by direct observation, assumes in the onset an acquaintance with with how ordinary matter “feels”. Our perception of space is somewhat influenced by the most direct contacts with our most immediate environment. The orange of sensations are evolutionary adapted to have the most maximum amount of knowledge be derived
Contact of the universes is not contact in the ordinary sense
When the universes disclosed within a vast vacuum “touch” each other, another universe is produced, in other words, the contact between two universe produce a new event. And these universes are constantly coming in contact with each other generating new events. This is counter intuitive because when massive objects interact with each other in space, they annihilate each other, for example two massive stars coming closer to each other result in either they merge together to form a new, larger neutron star, or they collapse into a black hole, which is their annihilation.
Planets coming to close to each other only have one result and that is both their destruction, but with every destruction there is an explicit generation in the universe, two planets colliding may result in the generation of a star. But in normal sensible experience contact between objects do not appear to sporadically generate things into being, although they do, we just take that result to be a necessary consequence of objects interacting in certain way, a car accident causes a wreckage, the wreckage is a result due to dense vehicles going at a certain speed collide into each other cause brokerage in the material, but this change in material due to the contact can also be framed as a change in events, one moment the person is going to the grocery the next they are in the hospital, two completely different events, but moreover the contact between the materials have their event changed, at one moment the car is nice and put together and after the accident it is dispersed all over the street.
It is assumed that before contact can result in generation, there has to be a set of meditating steps between the two objects in contact to cause their contact to bear something new, for example, a man coming into contact with a women requires that he disperses his seed into the egg in order to bear a child. However this kind of cause and effect requires a series of precursory intermediating steps, however not ever intermediary step is observed , only major checkpoint. But there are many more implicit intermediating steps that result in direct generation, like the instantaneous change in form based on a collision, the intermediating steps for the change of a car before the accident to after the accident, is the rate and velocity in which the car is moving, the weight, density and mass etc.,
all these factors having a congruency at the moment of impact generate into being a change in the physical structure of both vehicles involved, but we take this change in structure as an obvious and given event after a contact is made, as if it comes from nowhere, it is just the random result of two bodies of metal hitting each other, but the wreckage is a potential in the structure of the metal to appear the way it does after impact. In other words the wreckage is not just a random consequence that happens due to the impact, but is what is begat, generated, and brought into being from the relations of body having a certain mass, density etc, moving at a certain speed with a certain velocity in relation to and in contact to with a similarly equal body of these quantities . This common sense situation is by no means commonsensical at the most fundamental levels of the universe, yet the phenomenon is the same. When a universe comes into contact with another, a series of infinite events occur into being, and it is these events that the Big Bang begins with as the start of the universe.
When the conception grows it means new conceptions are added into being, they pop into existence, and their contact makes a “greater” mass.
It is the self realization of itself. It is already there in everywhere, it already exists in its full potential, but only unrealized and therefore unresolved. The resolution is to “realize” more and more of itself, the word realize has a psychical meaning, means to become more aware of, or conscious of something that it was unconscious of before. And therefore the conception of the universe grows with the development of its self realization, it is already fully there, but not fully realized. The difference is that of time, it is at one point all there but not in any way realized, this is the earliest moment of itself.
As the duration of time goes “on” or “forward” we say, it becomes less and less realized because it is so much of itself initially, it has to become non of itself naturally because to be too much of everything all at once is identical with the unrealized conception, the conception that cannot pick out anything. Therefore the most infinite disposition of the universe is the most primal conscious position. The development towards self realization begins by particularizing the universal infinite into the most finite conceptions of itself, these finite conceptions we call arbitrary because we view them as random abstractions of space unrelated to each other, like an asteroid randomly hurdling in space, or a star at one point in space dying and another emerging, what appears to be “life” on one random rock in the universe, and and entire universe devoid of life.
These random and arbitrary abstractions of space, are themselves the conceptions of finite self realizing moments that the universe limited itself into, by limiting itself in the mind of a limited being, that being the observer. The turn in the evolutionary process of development, is when a most finite part of the universe, develops the most infinite conception of the universe, or rather the entire infinite scale of the universe, which was the most primitive and initial condition of the universe being unrealized, is now realized fully in that limited finite conception of the observer. The idea of zero point energy being a physical phenomenon is actually a mental quality, to fit the maximum amount of stuff into the smallest space, is only possible as fitting the most possible conceptions into mind if the observer.
contact in this sense is not physical touch. In ordinary sense experience we notice the surface of one object coming to closest approximation to the surface of another object. While the contact in the universal sense as indicative of the “bubble universe” theory, is more of an expansion of what is conceived in the universe, and the blank spots when they fill in with content from different directions, they appear to fill into each other, exhibiting an initial moment of contact, than later forming the same perspective. (Add how black holes are formed)
The conception is growing but we interpret that as two external objects coming into contact to bear a new one, which is true but in a counter intuitive manner, because when the contact of two objects make a new one, the two still remain there but a new object comes into being, like the parents do not ceases to be once the child is born. However with the form of conceiving into being at the universal level, there are reference frames scattered from each other, this may perhaps be our limited observation of the universe scattered at different places of it, and they come together to form the same reference frame, a bigger and fuller picture, which is new because it discloses new connections that in each conception on its own did not seem to connect, but now we see how the components disclosed within one frame connect with the other.
When two external perspective come together, they form one. This is how the present conception is maintained, a future and a past perspective always coming together to form the present.
They are not actually contacting, just more is being revealed, the relation between each is being conceived, and therefore gives rise to a new and distinct object. The conception in relation to the object brings about a new moment of it.
Time like a floating thought cloud
Geometrically when we think of time as linear the image of a line comes into a mind that is extended without limit. In other words we can say the initial moments of the Big Bang marks the point from where the line is drawn and it is being extended up until this moment in a straight manner and beyond. However time is not studied in this manner because we observer time as a discrete moments of happening each with their own span. but rather the spatial extension quality of time exhibits the linear nature, that is, when you directly observer something, there is a straight continuity from the observer to the object being observed, the distance between any two objects involves an extension moving uniformly in one direction only, without a curve or a bend.
This spatial phenomenon we mistakenly take as the general trend for the movement of time. Time is rather studied as Einstein showed by the gravitational effect of an object on spacetime. This means that time is more of a self contained system that exhibits a measure related to the concentration of an energy source, which means that time is related to the behaviour and activity of a particular kind of thing. This is what a science radius is, it is the measure of time disclosing the determination of a particular thing, the radius is the determination in a certain way, while the circumference of the circle is the time disclosing it, meaning its form and potential activity.
A radius is just an arrow pointing to a circle. Or rather the form being in motion or determined in a particular way. These are all qualities of the conception changing, or rather shifting its reference frame from one point to the other.
The particular determination of an object is a return into itself, this means that, when a thing acts, it is actualizing one of its possible forms that discloses it, that belongs potentially to it, this form is its time, hence the radius as an arrow pointing to the circumference of the circle. The conception that is disclosed within what it conceives, both are identical duration that comes into being and such than fades out, into another conception.
Time is like a thought cloud
A matter is something which cannot be conceived without, which is also the definition of self-evident, which is when something is conceived and therefore cannot be conceived without constitutes a material. For example any object has to be either in one of the three physical states liquid, solid and gas, and each of these states involve to some degree the other state, gas and liquid are still solid in the sense they have mass and are compacted, a solid involves liquidity in that it is malleable and is able change and move, and gases in that it involves weightlessness, not infinitely dense, it can be penetrated and broken through and dissipate.
Asking why something has to be one of these states, or more generally why something has to be material, is like asking why something needs a marker to be identifiable, or why an animal needs legs to walk. In other words matter serves a function for consciousness. idea must have some discernible elements to be understood as a particular thing, for anything to be communicated as not everything else must involve discernible features which it can not do without and are part of how it is presented to be a present thing that exists. (Add to little conceptions)