DNA- paths of possibility
Section 63 (last updated 4.07.2021)
(Find cross ways)
DNA is the passage of events
Gene definition
Order is the very form of a particular object and not merely that an object is in a particular order.
The word gene-ration contains the term “gene” synonym of genetics is technically defined as ” a distinct sequence of nucleotides forming part of a chromosome, the order of which determines the order of monomers in a polypeptide or nucleic acid molecule which a cell (or virus) may synthesize.”
The definition of gene as a unit of information held to determine a characteristic passed on from parent to offspring is explainable as a sequence disclosing the relations forming a cell of the living organism. However so part as an individual body containing organs is contained entirely of these cells, these cells exhibit a different function throughout the entire construction of the body. At very biological layer forming any individual living organism, are a set of different kinds of cells with different purposes, each fulfil the function of granting a specific part of that organism, whether that be akin to protect the life form from its outside environment, this can be a protection against the macroscopic and microscopic dualism happening within between the dimensional make up of an object. Cells come together as a species to form the general parts of an individual body. As to what these genes are as a species is not entirely explained by our ordinary study of biology. The science of biology itself reaches this limit in understanding what the cell is beyond its constitution as an innumerable spectrum of itself. Biology must enter into chemistry, and chemistry reaches the limit corresponding to the molecular state forming part of the nuclei in every cell.
In every cell there exists a “passage of nature”, we call the “nuclei”, passage as if it looks like a black hole, a portal in the cell, an infinitesimal point into another domain of physics, this is where the limit of chemistry is found and whereby it enters upon physics. The nuclei simply means centre, midpoint, middle, core of the cell. But this position does not alone explain the true function of the nuclei, which in all biology textbooks will be defined as the place where the cell originate from: or rather in more scientific terms, the nuclei is the function of the cell whereby it can replicate itself, and where any form of generation related to the cell originates from. which ultimately means when they are homogenous together, perform but rather a specific function.
Down under in the place where physics try’s to study, is an entirely different physical world. I say “physical” because it still satisfies the philosophical definition of what it means for something to be material, which is a substratum, something being a necessity of platform for some other presupposition of a determinacy which has the motion and the mean by which a motion is bright into form, the form of the substrate which bring it into characterizing an idea, exhibiting some kind of expierence or some kind of observer, each of which me necessarily takes on an infinite of forms. A gene is a predisposition to certain kind of experiences.
For one thing the cell is always in a survival mode against viral infections and therefore species of cells are in a constant spectrum of generation – they are coming in and out of being constantly. Empirical science today cannot predict when the atom will come into being and or out of being, every time you try to measure it, it does the opposite of the intended intention, and therefore always provides opposite results than what the method of observatory supposed prior to even doing the experiment in the first place.
“Ration”
The term “ration” is quantum concept because it defines a fixed amount where a course of event may repeat over and over again. Generation in this sense is a gradation- a feed back loop. The relation between a cell and a virus constitutes the same sequence of generation whereby the cell is replaced by virus and the virus is overcomes by the cell. The virus is not merely an outsider force aiming to overtake the cells while the cell aims to maintain itself against a viral invader. This simplification ignores the fact that the cell and virus form a cycle of the same generative process. A virus constitutes a challenge for the cell by being a corrupting influence and is therefore a necessary property for the cells membrane which constitutes part of its immunity and metabolization of energy. A virus in some sense stimulates the liquidity of the cells membrane to flow and control the movement of ions and organic molecules in and out of the organelles. As to whether a virus is something which a cell can do without is not clear because they are found in every ecosystem and are the most numerous type of biological entity.
Viruses are particles known as virions and they exhibit fundamental geometric movements and shapes range from simple helical and icosahedral to more complex shapes.
—pieces of DNA that can move between cells—while others may have evolved from bacteria. In evolution, viruses are an important means of horizontal gene transfer, which increases genetic diversity.
It is an interesting factor that horizontal gene transfer is the primary mechanism of virulence
Viruses are transmission of the experiences from one body that goes through it to another body.
particle injects its DNA or RNA into the host cell called entry. The invading DNA or RNA takes over the cell and recruits the host’s enzymes. The cellular enzymes start making new virus particles called replication. The particles of the virus created by the cell come together to form new viruses.
How can the virus know how to replicate itself in the cell?
The term generation is also used to describe people within a time frame generally considered to be an average period of about thirty years, during which children are born and grow up, become adults, and begin to have children of their own. When we say that a particular thing generates into being the proper understanding is to regard the thing as a sequence of time. If time is more fundamental than any particular event disclosed in it, in the sense that events have a duration, than an object is only a particular thing disclosed within a moment in a sequence of duration. A sequence is a set of related things following each other in a particular order. But here we are trying to explain how the object itself is a particular order of things not only that it is part of an order. Moreover as part of temporal definition it is important not only to explain that things exhibit a sequence where one follows the other but must explain how a sequence is an abstraction of a particular form in a movement of change.
The duration is not explained as a timeline whereby a particular object constitutes a place on it because first must be explained how a change is a discernible part of a duration manifests as discrete magnitude. A timeline should not be confused with a landscape defined as all the visible features of an area. Landscapes explain a timeline by a perceivable area but a timeline so far it is the duration of an activity is not necessarily subject to a defined area. It is important to explain temporal activity as it proceeds beyond a specific area which in other words is identical with the formation of an area because an area is a conception where the extent of a movement reaches a limit. An area is related to the extent of an activity because it is defined as a space allocated to a specific purpose, that purpose being the function of an activity, and the area is a space for that function.
There are two possibilities of limiting an object in motion within a certain terrain; either the terrain disclosing the object is fixed and a change in the objects motion preaches beyond the limited scope of the landscape; or that a terrain itself changes to disclose a mediation between a fixity of distinct objects. In either case we have a dynamic form where each is disclosing the other but in this movement we have the fact of simply “being there”, I.e. A thing with a body that moved, a dynamic fixture. A landscape is explainable as taking on the form of a dynamical timeline. This is to say that a motion is not discerned within an area but the area itself is in motion.
Therefore a fixity or an abstraction of an activity is not merely an object resting on another object of which are also abstractions of a changing conception not picked out by the static interaction of one thing externally related to another, but rather each object is exhibiting a moment of the duration which constitutes its motion. This is how an object remains a static form while changes beyond its fixity to exhibit the duration of the activity forming it. The nature of DNA as forming the genome of a particular cell operates in the manner whereby the cell goes through the set of sequences inscribed in the genes forming it. For example cell division is a duration following the sequence of DNA replication.
This image provides an analogous idea of how the cellular structures of a particular object are moments from its DNA replication process.
DNA is structure of body
(Find Aristotle on the soul) It is often stated that science only begins in the modern era with Descartes. Science in the sense of experimentation and empirical data. But this is only what is recorded as the both of experimental empirical science. Anyone who fails to associate Aristotle’s philosophy with scientific investigation has a narrow usage of the term. Aristotle in his philosophical inquiry is empirical because he was in tune with the empirical manipulation of natural objects such as kinds of plants and organisms brought from accord the world. On some accounts his notion of the soul is first evidence of what we call today DNA.
Aristotle’s notion of the soul precisely describes the form of the duration as the substrative quality of object- in medical terms, Any layer or stratum lying beneath another. The soul is the duration of the body, the former the time and the latter the space. The soul is the activity of the body providing it with form, the duration of the body, its lifespan is the extent of its formal durations entering in and out of existence. As aforementioned our understanding of duration as the fading in and out of being in the linear pattern exhibited by the suggestion of spatial extension of the timeline, but that the spatial extension itself spawns into being by taking on the form of the duration; it is important to relate this appearing and dispersing of duration with the form of sphere because only then we can see how the nature of quality arises. Sphere insofar as characterizing the nature of totality does not necessarily move anywhere outside itself like in terms of locomotion but rather concerns the motion of configuring the structure where quality of the body exhibits for consciousness the idea. The duration of coming into and out of being is the process of actually returning to itself.
The passage of DNA is form of pattern (Alan watts 4:001:00). DNA for example is not the duration of going in and then away but rather its very passage is the form of the human specimen. Its activity is the very structure of the organism. DNA is the duration of geometric relations.
DNA is the soul the essence of the body because it exhibits dialectical relation. Meaning that it can speak with itself and this language is translated into form and moulded into matter.
(Add soul and body)
Locomotion is external expression of the internal relations, the inherent structure of determination manifest as particular object. We see this most evidently in orbital systems, planets are spherical as objects and they move in spherical patterns. An orbit is in the first case “the curved path of a celestial object”, we see that it bears a complete spherical circular path due to the spherical structure of a star, planet, or moon, it revolves around. The movement of some entity precisely is based on its structure but not in the obvious way that the structure is the mechanics of the movements. We take as common sense the fact that winged animals fly and biped animals walks.
In contemporary times biologist say that genetics are responsible for the nature of the organisms locomotion. But it is not so evident whether genetics is merely responsible for the capacity of the particular locomotion like a cause of the effect, or if the locomotion is particular expression of the genetics. If the latter is true than the perceivable locomotion of an organism is exact expression of the microscopic motion of its genetics. This fact is grounded in what is logically fundamental principle of epigenetic, that DNA is actively changing with the activities of the animal. In Darwinian evolution the common claim is that development happens over long period of time, however epigenetic reduces the timespan within which development can occur to no limited length, development can happen instantaneous. Moreover this change in genetic information is accounted for by the fact that DNA is extension of the life forms mental conceptions in relation to its environment in the same way the nervous system branches out of the brain organ.
Empirical facts about the neurological chemistry of the brain explain nothing about consciousness but only the physical operations of the brain organ, which like any organ of the body such as the heart, we are not only looking for evidence that blood is pumped through the artery but what this motion entails as being part of some rational conception, what “drama” is being depicted by these physical actions?
To answer this question, it is important to go beyond the fundamental suppositions of darwinian evolution. In fact the term “supposition” bears two fold meaning; first, with the basic term “suppose” there is implication of hypothesis which is to pursuit knowing proper, and second the arriving at position. When we arrive at a position of knowledge, we have to ask what is the process that brought us to that position in the first instance, and it is clear that the interchange of that with another is subsumed by the action of supposing. Supposition is by logical function limited to the supposed position by implying contradiction, which is the contrary side taking the diction, the choice.
Natural artificial selection
The course of evolutionary fitness has been more achieved from implicit relations rather than the external relations ordained by empirical study although the power of sensations sublated as empirical observation made explicit very implicit operations that cause what we understand by natural life.
Darwinian evolution states that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual’s ability to compete, survive, and reproduce. The history of the species is the process of acquisition for their individuals the features for survival during the present of their livelihood. The species does not really exists in nature as the individuals that make it up because quantitively the species is merely the sum set of individuals, but the species as an idea shared among the individuals is their very essential nature. For example birds do not communicate to each other before they flock together in patterns but such patterns are innate in each individual such that that when each moves individually according to their freedom of flying, the motion is synchronization of the patterns implicit in each. (Add here chaos theory, how randomness makes order, vice versa how order causes what appears to be randomness)
natural selection is not for mere survival because the species has already survived enough to result in its individuals, Darwinian evolution lacks the notion after survival which is thriving. Natural selection understood by whitehead is said to be the attempts of the species for its individuals to thrive. The term “natural selection” is contrasted with artificial selection, the latter Darwin hypothesizes has to be intentional, whereas the former is not. This poor hypothesis commits the widespread mistake associated with empirical observation which associates somethings lack of knowledge with its lack of order, that because something is not yet revealed must mean that it has no intent. This basic logical supposition concerning the idea of natural selection enables inconclusive interpretations about empirically derived physical facts. For example, the fact about the giraffes long acquired neck is said to be caused by the constant stretching of the muscles to reach higher up on trees.
Yet the actual physical stretching of the neck does no more to explain biological “fitness” of the giraffes acquired characteristic than wood can be used to explain how house is built because the structure of the building is not mere material but the way of it. (Add here Aristotle physics describe house vs logician) the physical stretching of the neck is exercise of the more fundamental idea of its cause which possess aim to attain the most qualitative element conceived by its consciousness, in the giraffes case the acacia tree which constitutes most of its diet grows in a manner where all of its shrubs are at the very top supported by one big trunk. The giraffes desire must have acted on the intuition that shrubs found at the highest peak of tree are most plentiful. This fact does not claim that the giraffe possess reflective knowledge about the fact the maximum exposure of sunlight correlates to the most plentiful shrubs. But there is an obvious intentional effort on the part of the giraffe to find the finest shrubs due to its experience of trying out different qualities of shrubs. In this way the giraffe does possess ethical element of knowledge, meaning that its conduct from experience carried with it wisdom. How this wisdom is appropriated by the giraffe explains exactly the causes for its physical changes.
Darwinian fitness in Biology is “the genetic contribution of an individual to the next generation’s gene pool relative to the average for the population, usually measured by the number of offspring or close kin that survive to reproductive age.
The contribution of the individual are his experiences
Once the organism evolved out of the microscopic dimension into what we consider by sensation and empirical observation the macroscopic, the test for fitness became the more internal struggle with microscopic organism rather than by contrast the macroscopic external relations between animals. Since animals do not have concept of death, their immoderate annihilation by another animal bears no worry to them. Animal life for fitness rather became the struggle for achieving quality of life which is most threatened by microorganism causing disease, distress etc. The entire physical specimen of animal body had evolved in most cases as response to microscopic operations rather than external relations with macro environment
We know that the tonsil is immune system against bacteria but how it does so breaches beyond its mechanisms of getting rid of them, the interesting fact relates to how it does so ecauae in understanding how it does so we see the work of reason interplay. The uvula is bait for bacteria, like a steak on a stick, bacteria flocks to it and the tonsils acting like fangs in conjunction with mucus lunge, swallow and trap the microorganism. Micro-orbs
(Add to virus)
His-story HIStory
DNA replication
If you zoom into any object, you see it’s series of possible events constituting it’s motion are built in its magnitude
DNA replication is a very complex and interesting process but in modern times it is reduced to a mechanical process of molecular biological operation. Modern biology is incompetent when making the following connection: we know that DNA replication is responsible for biological inheritance and genetics, but how is the function of DNA replication doing its own thing of incorporating and assembly raw material together be related to the kind of organism it forms to grow and repair?How does the aim of DNA replication relate to the function of the cell as exhibiting a certain kind of form constituting a portion of a living organism whose external behaviour is outside the realm of its internal operations?
The double helix in the DNA system is the indeterminate continues infinity of possible events. The compnenete in the process of DNA replication such as Helicase, topoisomerase, DNA primase and polymerase, DNA ligase etc. Are the kind of relations that determine or “unwind” infinity continuity of possible events to a definite formation that then undergoes experience of events constituting its particularity.
(Add derivative differentiation
DNA replication is for the function of cell division. The replication process aims to produce two identical replicas from one original molecule. DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) involves the double helix which are two chains that foil around each other carrying the “instructions” or the events and experiences for growth, development of anything living. During replication, psychically to replicate something is to reaffirm it, the double strand is separated by helicase. This separation is part of dialectical method because each strand of the original molecule serves as a template for the production of its counterpart- known as semi conservative replication results in new helix will be composed of an original DNA strand as well as newly synthesized strand.
The so called “lagging-strand” is the undifferentiated original one, contrary to its terminology, it is more fundamental than the “origins of replication”, which is a particular sequence in a genome at which replication is initiated. Following the origins or the separations the “elongation” stage is where the new strand grows one base at a time. In this state the particular experiences of events happen- it is said that a leading strand and lagging strand result in this state but this is only because these are abstractions of what happens when the unwinding occurs, you have end and beginning.
The unwinding effect is however indefinite after the “termination” stage of replication where specific nucleotide sequences serve as signal to stop transcription and RNA polymerase and mRNA detach.
The double helix are fundamental inorganic and organic material that are the universes materials. These are all the possibilities of form that are the ingredients for events. DNA replication is a fundamental process whereby a particular sequence from a duration is extrapolated to form the particular organisms that will undertake the experience disclosed by origin until the termination. But the unwinding is indefinite feature and passes on by branching out the variability of all life forms partaking in the particular sequence of their DNA replication process. The events experienced by individual organisms corresponds to the duration of their DNA replication process.
In fact we can go as far to say that that the DNA replication process constitutes the events for the organism to experience. For one thing the body is one extrapolation, the environment is another. The occurrences
(Add DNA section to the Higgs section, Higgs as the organism where the indeterminacy of vibrations change into the particular events disclosed within DNA forming particular life)
In the specialized sciences like physics when an indeterminacy is arrived at, it is usually explained as a limitation in human capacity for observation because it became a true doctrine that the state of the world is greater than our sensible faculties. In the ontological philosophies however so far a human capacity for observation is taken as a property in the world, its limitation mirrors a fundamental universal limitation in the world. This means that whenever science reaches a dead end of a limit, this limit is not only due to a human incapacity but also that the development of the world as arrived at a particular conception of itself. The progression of the world is identical with what is discovered by itself about itself as what it is actually. (Add to string theory) For example, in string theory empirical science verifies that there is a fundamental indeterminacy found at the level where atoms becomes vibrations of some sort labeled as “strings”.
Modern string theory reveals by way of empirical proof of a indeterminacy physically manifest but does not explain what this indeterminacy is as an organism. The lack of knowledge in the realm of physics is met with another indeterminacy in the realm of biology. Genes when looked at through a microscopic involve certain shapes and physical properties that can for example discern a certain linage or race an individual belongs to. In biology it is known that genes originate from DNA like molecules from atoms but it is not exactly known how one leads to the other because where genes end and DNA begin is a very indeterminate line for observation. When does going down microscopically into the cells of your arm no longer becomes the cell identifying your arm? in the indeterminacy of the vibration is answered with the indeterminacy of the DNA, the answer to physics is answered with the question of biology.
DNA is the content of the vibrations, and the indeterminacy of the osculations is the form of the DNA
Field of genetics is piece of spacetime
Genetics is defined as the make up of an organism in what is acquired over a period of time. Modern science has a good grasp of studying acquired traits like bodily, mental, diseases etc. Early in the 19th century the way traits are handed down from parents to offspring is explained by way of discrete “units of inheritance”, which is the term used to define a “gene”, and it is still used today, but is an ambiguous definition of a gene. It remains vague as to what it means to acquire a trait. In what sense does a parent actually “pass” down traits to the offspring? Is passing genes down the same like handing it down, as if one person gives an object and the other receives it? This misapprehension naturally arises.
Pierce heredity
“The word natura evidently must originally have meant birth; although even in the oldest Latin it very seldom bears that meaning. There is, however, a certain subconscious memory of that meaning in many phrases; just as with words from there is the idea of springing forth, or a more vegetablelike production, without so much reference to a progenitor. Things, it may be, spontaneously; but nature is an inheritance. Heredity, of which so much has been said since 1860, is not a force but a law, although, like other laws, it doubtless avails itself of forces. 9 But it is essential that the offspring shall have a general resemblance to the parent, not that this general resemblance happens to result from this or that blind and particular action. No doubt, there is some blind efficient causation; but it is not that which constitutes the heredity, but, on the contrary, the general resemblance. So, then, those naturalists are right who hold that the action of evolution in reproduction produces real classes, as by the very force of the words it produces natural classes. (121)”
There are two aspects of evolution that needs to be pointed out to answer this question; first, there is “memory” in nature, we call it heredity, in the sense that certain traits are preserved.
second, there is “novelty” in nature that certain new changes occur. It is important to explain what is meant by “new”, which means two things;
“not existing before; made, introduced, or discovered recently or now for the first time
“already existing but seen, experienced, or acquired recently or now for the first time
There is also a qualitative element to the definition;
“just beginning or beginning anew and regarded as better than what went before
We refer to genes as “genetic information” in the sense that genes are not themselves physical attributes in the sense of an arm, organ or any other body part. When we say ‘you are made up of genes’, that means genes are the ingredients for the make up of someone. However in what sense do genes being the ingredients of something describe what it actually is, because if genes are information for making up the body, than the genetic are almost identical across all individuals of the species, and almost identical even across other species.
Physiologically speaking human have almost identical bodies with each other and even with the neighbouring species like monkeys. Other than density in bone, height, facial aesthetics, and physical orientation, bodies are generally alike, they fundamentally operate the same with the same orang, immune response etc., genes must therefore also include information on non physical aspects that explain the make up of a specific individual, like their personality and psychology. If we enter into the non physical domain as part of someone genetics than we can ask, if the personality is described by someone’s genes, do genes also describe non physical aspects like someone’s experiences and events? Are the events that happen in someone’s life included in their genes?
This may perhaps seem like a far fetched inquiry however the way the circumstances of the individual contributes in explaining who they are, is an integral aspect in the science of psychology. For example the ego and id are mediated by the superego, the superego, or how a person behaves in society, determines their primal instincts along with their thoughts and attitudes. We can say that in the idea of the superego, society simply serves as an external stimulus for the individual but the study of the psyche still remains at the individual level and their responses to external stimulus, society is not taken in the literal to be a part of the individual. However this is not all that defined and in fact constitutes an assumption. It is easier to define how an individual is part of society because the culture is shared; but it is more difficult how society is part of the individual. How internally related is society to the individual remains an ill defined subject in psychology.
If we look at the human physiology as a specimen of evolution, we see that it is healthy and functional by its own accord unless otherwise put into unnatural conditions or exposed to harsh circumstances that hinder it, like viruses, and it operates healthy for as long as it could given it’s determined lifespan. Moreover every new human is born and given the body with in most cases what is otherwise perfect operations and functionality. The body of the organism is what is maintained and worked on by evolution, it is the “memory” of nature, what is persevered for any new offspring. The physiology of the body belongs to the species and not to individuals making up the species, the difference is that while individuals with different personalities come and go, the body remains as part of the characteristic defining the species, the type or class that an individual belongs to. Time from this physiological stand point is linear, the body has been progressing in development since the beginning of life, it has used and disused a series of traits and is continuously doing so.
There is however the different element in evolution known as the mind, or the psyche. The development of the psyche in nature is much less known than the development of the body because it is not as straightforward. The mind does not have a continuous progression through time, but appears to have discrete spans in time which it emerges than re-emerges. Mental Experience is that we are born than die, than someone else is born than dies and so on and so forth, and each is a discrete measure of mind having certain time period of experience. We see one thing than another. In this way consciousnesses is born into circumstances it finds itself in, learns about those and itself, and then it is wiped out, and than the same cycle re-emerges. But as to whether consciousness is in nature or rather nature in consciousness, nature means here it’s crude circumstances, is a difference that matters, because if consciousness is in its circumstances, that means it is a variable within it, like there are many rocks on the ground, and it is at the wimp of chance that consciousness comes up and then goes away, that means this behaviour of consciousness is not rational because it exhibits no pattern or rhythm. If we take this position that consciousness is being randomly carried out by its circumstances,
If we take the opposite approach and say nature is within consciousness, or is disclosed by consciousness, than the feature where it emerges and re-emerges is a quality rather than a redundant quantity with no avail or aim. But we say that this awaking and fading of consciousness is its element of time, it is cyclical not linear, and is therefore the mechanism for novelty. In time linearity is the quantity of repetition, whether this be the body maintained throughout generations, and therefore we can see evolution as just a series of new bodies being born over and over again, this redundancy explains necessity and for there to be a platform and landscape for existence, however on its own it is empty and lifeless. Time as a cycle is the element of this redundancy into novelty and it is the quality of the mind.
For linearity there is actually the discreetness of being on one point on the duration and this is why it is “Linear” because a single point constitutes a measure for a certain length from both sides of the line.
In a linear state of time there is always a past and a future to come so that your only ever at this point mediating the two sides of the length. In this way there is what appears to be the experience of one event at a time and not a simultaneity of all at once. And so the redundancy is in the order of events experienced, one comes after another, and within this there are spikes
From a nonlinear state of time, like cyclical, the time is complete with itself, and therefore there is no event to come, or a past event, all events are present.
This is the state for novelty because every event is new all the time. We think that because something is eternal or there for ever, it must be boring or non excitement,
We have some instances of this novelty whenever a new event is experienced in our linear state of time, with a new event for example triggers higher dopamine surges.
Genetics- destiny is density
Genetics is just choosing an entirety of a life sequence and living it, and this constitutes the make up of each moment in it. The complement is somewhere in the sequence and the sequence forms t make up the component. Every possible event simultaneously exists at the same time. This is the field of genetics, and the mind chooses a general life duration, is born into that, what is persevered as the body, this is why you look the way you look, because how you look is caused by the kind of life duration determined. You can look at it from either way, a prostitute looks like the way she does because of her line of work or because of her line of work summons the prostitute to look like the way she does. We can say this is random, that there happens to be a female who looks a certain kind of way, and that there happens to be an occupation that requires a person to look a certain kind of way, and they meet and are perfect for each other. This extrapolation nevertheless is based on the person and their path to be necessary part of the same thing. The issue is whether their relation is somehow more fundamental than they are parts, this can be called “destiny”.
Destiny means the events that will necessarily happen to a particular person or thing in the future. This can either mean that there are certain events that will happen, like death, or that irregardless of whether certain things happen or not, things are necessarily bound to happen, like you be getting married, or maybe not, but in either case something is bound to happen.
Destiny in Latin destinata, feminine past participle of destinare ‘make firm, establish’. In terms of meaning this has an interesting relation to a similar sounding work yet completely different, density Latin densitas, from densus ‘dense’. To establish is to make firm, or in other words, to make sense.
Genetics is the path you selected as your life. We think that genetics is inside of us but we got this idea from simply the idea that genetics is our make up. But the idea that genetics is our make up is not necessary the same to say it is inside of us like our fabrics, what makes us moreover is cells and proteins, at the domain of genetics, we are coming closer to the molecular and therefore the atomic, and to say that an atom is inside of you is no more imprecise than to say you are in the universe. You are an individual part in the universe, like an atom is an individual part in you, these general claims paint a wrong picture of what it means to be made up of atoms. You are made up genes by being in a sequence of them.
In a non linear state of time, at the spacetime fabric dimension, you see all the genetics potentials laid out as sequences of their life reiterations. And the mind chooses to select a bundle or a packet of possibilities in hopes of determining that into a reality. The mind enters a selected lifespan with a set of possibilities, some are more probabilities than others, and acts in a sequence making it a reality. That real sequence was the necessary step for one of the possibilities to be available for the mind to have chosen as one of the many possibilities their life sequence is made up of.
Gene-rational
here-dity are the physical characteristics that are maintained throughout generations. A gene is a unit of heredity passed down by parents to offspring that determine what the offspring will acquire. The rational in the term generational concerns that what is being passed down are the conceptions of the predecessors. The offspring lives the life of his parents conceptions. The conception is the potential future being actualized by the reality of the present.
Conception is the invariable principle implicit in the generation of physical objects because that which becomes must in the first case be conceived as such. In other words, generation is conceived as that which nothing is not. The non-being of nothing; this double negative is the self-identity that conceives itself from the negation -from what it is not- it identifies that place as the object taking on the presentation of its own being, it manoeuvres this matter to mold over the concept of itself. The difficulty of understanding the connection between the concept of a physical entity as its active generational form is complicated by the arbitrariness of our acquaintance with the nature of quantity. (See hyle matter)
—-
The mind-body problem in quantum mechanics provides the framework for understanding the collective behaviour of large numbers of interacting particles
While the underlying physical laws that govern the motion of each individual particle may (or may not) be simple, the study of the collection of particles can be extremely complex.
The conception is the interception of mind and body.
The classical soul and body problem exhibited in mythology and religion has transformed in the modern scientific tradition to the mind-body dualism. Descartes initially known for introducing this problem has had its full elaboration in Kant. Mind-body dualism revolutionized the questions put forward by the the ancient idea that the soul is separable from the body. The idea that the soul is separate from the body brings into light the following questions; the soul and body are not the same substances, and their differences is that the soul is permanent and the body is not.
This difference of permanence does not mean that the body and soul can be understood independently from each other. It has been a historical fallacy to say that because the soul is permanent it can exist without a body and that the soul is more primary because it does not require a body. To say that a primary principle is more fundamental because it does not require its secondary factor is inconclusive reasoning because it is only the initial form of inductive reasoning arriving at the distinction between something fundamental and secondary, but does not explain why something becomes more fundamental in the first place, which is by describing the value of making use of its secondary attribute, in other words, the determining agency in a process is what we mean by more fundamental. We have to first assume primary and secondary to make the claim that one is more fundamental than the other, which can lead to the false assumption that one may exists without other, but can only make that claim after presupposing that both must necessarily exist, one as primary, one as secondary.
The connection that the soul is permanent with the notion that the body is not, therefore the soul can exists without the body, and the soul is primary because of its agency from the body ; these are all connections that are not necessarily valid by mere virtue of having been structured in relations to each other. Formal logic misconstrued natural reasoning or that informal logic construes formal logic when the mere connection of premises itself is taken as the truth of the premises. If validity in terms of mere structure is only made as the criteria for determining the truth of an argument, which is what formal logic does, without granting the fundamental ground by which it is able to do that, namely that structure is filled with a real and actual content, like an organic one, or a house or a man etc. then we loose the grounds of what to apply from what we derived,
Formal logic abstracts from the world its fundamental relations and takes those as the basis for judging the truth of objects it just derive these relations from. On some level formal logic is the most natural and crudest form of the understanding. Formal logic looks at the world and finds structures, and abstracts these structures independently from their content, and argues that these structure can then later be applied in every context wherein a content is found. At this point of analysis formal logic is admittedly correct in everything it does, however at the most crucial point of distinguishing between the abstract relations from the natural content it was derived from, formal logic excluded the content entirely, and it must do so that the abstract structures do not become arbitrary byproduct of the particular object under analysis, but becomes something more fundamental derived from it applicable to all objects. The problem is that when the understanding makes the exclusion of the relations from the content, the negative reason is when the content itself is taken as something that was never part of the form it was derived from because the content is replaceable, is concluded
The strong emphasis placed on the difference of the soul from the body resulted in a proper synthesis between them, and the soul was adopted as something that remains
The claim that the soul is not permanent in a body is not the same to say that soul can be understood without a relation to body, or matter generally, but only in the context of finite conception, the soul is able to change its acquaintance with a body, and this change is the corruptibility of the body, that the body is dependent on the mind for the conception of its form. The modern mind-body dualism is a development of the soul body problem by changing the meaning of the term “soul” into the concept of mind.
Mind characterizes exactly what kind of substance the soul is as distinct from body, which took on the more general meaning of matter. Mind is the function of the soul because it is its power of conception, in the case of matter, the conception of bringing into being the body. The mind is fundamentally not the same substance as body, or in other terms, the mind itself is not body, which does not exclude the other notion that mind is incomprehensible without body. The modern mind-body dualism framed its concern about this fundamental relation with the paradox that the mind is not the same as body but cannot do away without it.
The contradiction between the infinite and finite characterizes exactly what kinda substances the mind is as opposed to matter. This difference in substance work against each other to constitutes the whole of the picture. The mind is an infinite substance.
The infinite symbol is an abstraction of DNA, which is the concrete portrayal of it in nature.
The infinite as organically structured explains precisely the relation of a mind to a body. The mind is a fundamental conception of being, and it overlaps onto a body, the process of the mind in a body is the process of a conception undergoing the duration of a particular experience. The relation of mind and body can be understood by an initial intersection where they parallel each other to constitutes the same duration. In that duration of an experience the mind and body mediate in a fluctuating manner. The mind body unity constitutes the organic life cycle of a consciousness. the developmental process of a human life operates dynamically in the same way as DNA is structured.
A DNA structure is an infinite intersection of a conception to a body,
The body discloses the event, in between each diamond structure is disclosed a possible event.
At the moment of birth we have an initial interception of mind with body. This initial interception is the entrance of a conception onto a particular process, the conception becomes one with the process. In the initial stages we see that the mind, say marked by the red, and body, by the blue line, are paralleled in an inverse ascension further away from each other. For example we see during birth, a baby is barley conscious and the body is slowly learning and adapting the physical necessities required for phonological continuation. The body in the first few days learns how to breath, then how to swallow, how to digest and defecate etc. At this point the mind is at a decline in consciousness but the body is at an incline in fruition. This continues past adolescence and during the early stages of adulthood a major transformation occurs where the intersection of the mind body become inverted.
The body slowly starts to decline while the mind begins to incline. For the first time the mind governs consciously the body, and the body is no longer a mere automatic set of operations to which the mind is adapting to. During adulthood the critical point depends on how healthy the mind is will correlate to the prolongation of the body from decay. In extreme cases of pathologies like psychosis, individuals develop schizophrenia, which is an absolute separation of mind from body within the same duration. In schizophrenia, the mind develops complete independence from the body and does not find itself situated in it, therefore it develops to sabotage every aspect of itself the against the body.
Eventually the point of death is a separation intersection where the conception moves on from the particular duration the body encompasses and into infinite potentiality of another duration at a different timeframe.
DNA forms our structure deeper than merely constituting the material content that fills the body, but rather DNA operates at a more fundamental dimension impeded at a deeper scale of time. DNA constitutes the duration of all events the individual body will undergo throughout a lifetime. The so called DNA molecules are passages of nature that manifest out of an infinitesimal scale and into the macro-scale that constitutes the event for the conception in body to undergo the duration of. Now of course the duration is not the point of the event but is the measure of having the experience. The mind is an experience mechanism, and it measures the value of its currency by events.
A human body is an integrated system of their possible events, every possible event that happens to the individual is integrated in the DNA that forms their particular body. This is true due to a dimorphism where the environment is an active coordinate system chosen freely …
– (add function to DNA,) consciousness is the function of DNA in that it selects outwards the events predetermined in the structure of the object enduring the experience. The DNA of a life form are all the possible events that will happen to it in the duration of its timespans, the function of consciousness is to select inwardly such events to consistently the outwardly experience of them. In classical mechanics time is an external force, a value determined onto things to measure their duration. But in quantum mechanics time itself is an object of Inquiry, which is to say that it is a concert object that acts and not an abstract activity done by an object. To explain how an activity is an object answers why a material takes on its certain form.
Heredity
Birth is efficient causation because it is cycle. Each cycle derives new knowledge. That knowledge is inherited by the offspring generation in the next cycle. This is the mechanism of development. Heredity is the culmination of knowledge that is passed on then adopted in the next birth.
Genetics
What is the concept of Genetics? By this term I am referring to something deeper than biological predisposition, although that is one element in the inquiry. It is one aim included in the science of metaphysics to explain what the concept is in its essential being as a phenomena in nature. Genetics is generally defined as the understanding relating to origin arising from a common order (dictionary). In biology genetics is defined as the passing down of information from some common order. In biology genetics is understood from the concept of heredity- where mental and physical traits are passed down from one generation to another.
An example that combines both the idea of heredity to the general definition of genetics is something like “all the cells in the body contain the same genetic information”. The genetic information being the origin derived from past generations, whereas the cells being the common order that produce the body. All cells in a body have the same information so as to be of that body, yet the cells take on a different qualitative form depending on the reign of the body, e,g. Skin cells, blood cells etc.
There is an imbedded conception that serves a the same underlying layer of a diversity of different components. And each deeper layer is proposed by a deeper one and so on and so forth.
If we are trying to find the origin that serves as the common order for all life, we must understand what kind of common order can serve as the basis for a phenomena as complex as genetics. We normally hear the expert saying that genetics is the transference of information in life forms- every single organism possess DNA- the organism’s DNA serves as its self-replicating material that is the main constituent of chromosomes – the building block for proteins transfers… Explain more. DNA is formed into a double helix…explain more… This is the dialectic in a qualitative form, the contradiction is not just merely antagonistic but rather cooperative at this level…
But we are left in confusion to what this information is? Is it the code that carries traits and features for the formation of the offspring from the process of procreation? Where does the act of procreation between two individual animals from the opposite sex, or even procreation as an idea for life to exists as continuity, get its information so as to pass it on? Does each individual animal make their own information and pass it on? Surely that sounds misinformed if not absurd. Where did the generations predicting each individual animal get their information from? One answer is that the adaptation to the environment provides the animal with its genetic information.
The adaption to environment produces the specific kind of information to be passed on, but it does not create the information in general. The genetic information conveys a particular arrangement or sequence of life but it does not tell us what life is that is enduring these particular arrangements. If we hold to the view that life is created from the environment itself, then we must ask what powers in the environment could possibly give rise to life? If we cannot answer this question maybe we should conceive the relationship differently so as to understand it.
Genetics and consciousness
Genetics is the roaming of consciousness. It is Reason laying out its logic and then having consciousness of how its logic interact. The interaction of logic in the realm of nature is not random nor chaotic. DNA is the concrete form in which the logic of Reason takes. It is the idea as the object. Explain DNA…
Genetics is the concrete result of the process of reason aiming to achieve consciousness of itself. This consciousness of reason is the very constructive element in the world, it is what creates all object we see. How does this occur? First, reason lays out its logic. Second, it watches how its logic interacts. Logic in this sense is understood as the activity of Reason- and so it constitutes Reason by being its thinking about itself- and so this is identical with all thinking- reason is equal with itself as everything that can be thought of. At the very initial contradiction that bears the wry nature of Reason itself- we else where saw that the unity between being and non-being is dualistic contained as unity- and so this takes on a concrete form. Genetics is the laying out of all the logic of Reason as potentially. Every idea that is potentially true is laid out as a spectrum.
This spectrum has at its very essential nature the contradiction. The contradiction is infinitely logic- the very initial we keep coming back to is- being vs non-being. The concrete assumes is by being positive determination and negative determination. Both inverse determination constitutes each other as necessity- the necessity being the contradiction itself. And so positive takes on the progressive nature of actualizing itself but only because it has been first denied by the negative which assumes the passive and resistance nature. By resistance we do not mean to exclude and thus eliminate, this is one of those unavoidable conclusion we always make given our perception, rather it is the where the idea becomes- and when an idea becomes, the become presupposes being, becoming both at the same time. And so it is incomplete yet exists as being complete.
Genetics is every idea coming to be by virtue of the interaction with logic, the logic being the contradiction which has at its disposal the resolution to itself. in other words if the contradiction is found due to itself, the resolution is also found from itself. The resolution takes on the form of a living reality. Once logic takes on the info it set of loving realities- that produces reality itself. And in this reality the living ideas begin to interact- this interaction is inherently contradictory. In biology we have the vast difference of genetic advantages, each of which are not randomly granted but rather is the very result from reality itself as the interaction between the living idea, or the organic logic. Define biology account of genetics.
In evolution there is the spectrum of capabilities among life- there is a difference in the quality, quantity in asethical and ethical relation of true beings. This is the very challenge to the notion of Reason as the ethical process- we have the beautiful challenged by the not, the strong by the weak. But as we observer in nature these interactions never resort to injustice- insofar as you never see something significantly larger or more beautiful to exclude and thus exclude everything else so as to be itself- as the notion of the survival of the fittest seems to suggest when it is made an ethical idea.
We do see that among all species 99% are extinct, but this extinction simply happened from how the particular species related with its envoierment and its close ethical relations with other life form. And so we never see. Lion going after elephants even though that is more and not much harder to kill than dears. Wild life choose in moderation in how they relate with their envoierment. So we ask how is heredity related to genetics? Heredity is the passing on of genes not just in the trivial sense of passing off traits necessary for survival, it rather invokes the transmigration of consciousness in the genetic code- that being logic. But because each of its life forms is a product of its logic, it manifest in every life form- no matter how the difference in beauty and ethics. But it does not manifest the same in all but rather manifest differently precisely based on the difference in beauty and ethics. This difference is important for consciousness because upon having its logic laid out and having the relations now a reality, some of its relations invoke greater complexity and sophistication than other, because as we know now, the nature of logic is always constructive.
Consciousness is a state of energy exchange- laws of thermodynamics. The difference between Reason and matter as described by the difference between genetics and consciousness.
Genetics and consciousness work in an inverse relation.
The concept of Diversity- which is external relations as ratios of variables within sets- is in tension with homogeny- correspondence in form or structures, uniform invariability. The tensions between diversity and homogenous states of relations play out differently. In genetics- which is the information manifested as a material form. Genetics consists of diversity as the necessity in relation to homogeny as the determinacy or the means of development. It requires a certain level of variation in genetics to remain robust so that it has the necessary tool to adapted to stresses- a state change that requires a rebalance- reequalibration. From that homogeny then serves as the determinacy because homogeny defines a certain level of cohesion so as to enable it to have a sense of Self so that it can formulate the next idea of itself. This enters into the realm of consciousness- which takes on the reverse role in contrast to genetics.
For consciousness- diversity serves as the determinacy whereas homogeny serves as the necessity. Consciousness requires a uniform state of equilibrium in its state of Reason so as to formulate the idea. The self relation. This uniform state allows the nexus for its ideas to diversify into opposing transitions of each other. Genetics is the means consciousness is the end- one active one passive. Consciousness is logical because it looks for uncovering all potentialities of itself so as to then see what is the ideal form of all.
From our logic, the determinacy- that being the activity- predicates the necessity. So depending on the activity the necessity will change. The natural link between consciousness and its genetics is tending towards the genes being homogenous so as to allow for diversity of ideas. Evolution at this stage consisting of separate entities- we call individuals- is only a stage in the genetic process leading to a kind of organism which enables diversity of thought. In this stage each idea or set of ideas belong to individuals separate from one another. But this is only a phase in the grand scheme of the evolutionary process of consciousness because in consisting its ideas in separate individuals it A) sees what form the idea takes as an entity and B) how each ideas situated in separate individuals elaborate or contradict each other. In seeing how its ideas manifest in relations, it is then able to produce the kind of genetic code to produce a homogenous organism which can hold consciousness that is diverse in thought. This must be one entity completely homogenous in genetic so as to allow consciousness that is completely diverse in thought. Genetics being homogenous only means that the diversity is made into a uniform balance- so it can be rightly states as diversely homogenous- what is homogenous is the infinite variations of genetic potential each constitutive into one organism or entity.
Neurological system are potential routes of reality
Time is not linear but is determined in accordance with the potential route. This is exhibited by the structure of a neurosystem which is formed by a bundle of different routes of neuro transmitters, that are determined with different functions. the duration of the moment of a particular reality. Your brain are all the possible determinations you can choose to go through, the process of time as it relates to the duration of a lifetime, is the choosing of these routes in a manner that prove the whole of their relations. So an individual is the mechanism of going through each possible potential route in the brain to constitutes their reality and prove the whole bundle of routes as having the kind of relations they bear.
This is not meant to say that the world is in the brain, but that the brain itself is a system of the world potential energy. The brain is the system of the world potential routes of being. What we find is that the brain is developed on earth, but earth is an idea so far as it exhibits abstract rational structure, it is not the the idea is in the brain but the the brain is on an idea, and therefore is its potential realities. We think that ideas belong to a brain but that every object for the brain constitutes the form for its ideas.
The evolution of inorganic nature progressing into life form is a gradual process of thought developing independence from its body. By scientific accounts classical mechanics comes before quantum mechanics first because of historical reasons but mainly because classical mechanics describes the more immediate reality relative to the understanding and is therefore in tune with a generally highly developed faculty in the universe. However the aspects of nature that classical mechanics describes are in fact furthest away from being the foundation of reality but only foundations of nature relative to the development of the more recent organism of life, the human being.
The development of the universe is gradually going away from its initial capacity where thought is simultaneously the object which is equally that the object exhibits a rational structure.
(Connect with above singularity)
(Add light cone- to explain how)
Creativity
The laws of nature do not however explain creativity. Creativity is defined by desire which is the the diverse and infinite forms thought takes. The circle is the initial self-relation, desire produces the triangle, which is the next logical desire. Desire unlike what we think of is defined by necessity. As the common saying goes “necessity is the mother of invention”. Necessity is at the same time that which maintains desire. Necessity is not a determinism devoid of free will. It is instead the free will in accord with the rational will. The rational will is that which is the necessity for desire. If anything is to be desired it is that which is most perfect and eternal. This is the geometric and the logical relations. They are necessarily what they are and not something other, and anything other is but just the negation of what they are, and is therefore an inversion based on them.
The rational will is that which defines freedom. What we ordinarily think of freedom is to have the ability of doing whatever we want, to act on any desire. This is a misunderstood notion because freedom is to determine desire and not to be determined by desire. Which is exactly the notion for desire as a general principle in the world, that it is determined by reason. Freedom understood as a universal principle is the determination of desire in accordance with rationality.
Form in this sense is not only understood as the distinct property that makes an object function. Form also answers to the question of creation. Form is the production of the object. The logical relations operate as geometric figures in the world. Such geometric figure is the moulding of matter into unique form, that occupies a dimension. And each dimension is in the other. A square for instance requires a more concert substratum then circle does given that a circle is pure self- relation whereas a squire is more rigid given the equatorial angles. But the square is in the circle. So the ancient paradox of squaring a circle is a contradiction for the understanding, but for reason, it is literal and actually has that concrete form.
Such geometric relations of logic act as an infinitesimal emergence of form, where each logical geometric relation is a sublation of the other. The past is the predicate logical relation, the present is the culmination, and the future is the emergence. This process is the dialectical process, with each geometric relations, the dialectical process invokes all previous connections in the series constituting the infinitesimal emergence of form.
(Find uniqueness)
Mind can change atomic structure
Brain organic specimen
The brain is the perfect specimen of organic matter. If we look at the neurological root systems in the brain that is like the tree root system. The brain is a more developed organic universe in the interior of the universe within what we call “inorganic” matter, so as to mean “lifeless” as whitehead makes the science of Einstein’s makes the universe out to be a “lifeless” universe, rather than what whitehead argues for, which is “nature alive”. In the latter ontology about nature, nature exhibits itself as an organism, as the ontology of organicism makes it out to be. On one level nature appears dead and not much going on, but from another level nature is sprouting with life and everything is going on. The brain and the universe generally both share the same internal relation, because they are both caused and continue to develop due to the substance that is this uncaused energy, that which remains the same while causing all difference. This substance is what is referred to when the term “consciousness” is applied, of course there are too many misapprehension of how it is stated to be, but nevertheless all mistakes assume the same right starting point, that is, they all aim for the truth, even though a lot fail at ascertaining it.
I’d ego, superego
The id we define as the instinctual aspect of behaviour. Psychology deals with behaviour because the mind is too complex to examine in and of itself, it is first too small and there are too many diverse variables simultaneously concurring within it, too many parts to the puzzle for psychology to figure out. So they rather look at the persons behaviour. One behaviour is Implicit rather than most behaviours which are explicit. The id looks at the explicit behaviours and conclude that every individual has instincts, natural and undeveloped, loose instincts that require cultivation and temperance in executing.
The super ego developed as a more advanced way of controlling instinct and making them more rational, thought out through. Superego is known as the pressure from society and to confirm if not adapt a set of acceptable behaviours. But society is made up by an innumerable number of individual and separate egos that agree on what is considered conducive to the thriving of the collective number of egos. When egos agree on something to be valuable that becomes the idea of the superego. But egos are in a constant struggle, if not, battle with the ids, or rather controlling their ids, which come on upon them from unknown determination in the mind. The id makes the ego act on instinct in a very developed and deceiving manner. The ego is the actual taking on the character of the instinct, while the id is the idea that lures the ego to action.
In psychology the brain is divided famously by Freud into Id, ego, and superego. The Id and the superego are similar in the sense that both are external relations. The super ego is the external and social conditioning while the Id is the fixed and mechanical instincts and inclination for desires. Both the Id and superego are external relations because they are objects for the ego and they bear a definite nature. While the ego, even in psychology is very loosely defined. In psychology the ego simply means the faculty that mediates between the Id and Superego, governing them in relation to each other, to produce a sense of self-identity distinct from both, and one which can govern both. In philosophy, the ego is defined as consciousness, as the conscious thinking subject. The ego is therefore not something determined like the Id and Superego but its very nature is freedom, because it possesses the will to determine the parts of the mind that are fixed.
Atom in mind and outside mind
The brain is a product of evolutionary development in the sense that it is a higher computational system of reason. When compared with the universe generally, the brain is able to diversify logic by restructuring it. If we take for instance the atom as a logical compound, being a relation of positive, negative, neutral (proton, electron, neutron), then we see that in nature outside the mind, the atom comes in a fixed variation depending on the nature of the chemical compound, the basic hydrogen atom is a configuration of 2 electrons… if we ask however, how is it that the atom is indivisible, yet it is able to be numerically infinite. For example, how is it that the electron is a state of energy that cannot be broken apart yet there is such a thing as 2 electrons? What does it even mean to say that there is one electron that can be distinguished from another, when both are the same energy state? This requires that there be substance which conceives two different forms of the same energy state, and such a substance must therefore determine this.
Now if we examine the nature of the brain, the brain is a more evolved logical system in the universe because in the brain, the logical structure of the atom can be altered and reconfigured without being determined as one chemical over another. The brain can take any physical object that is one way outside of it, and place it in the abstract and change it’s possible configurations. When we take larger objects like a horse for example, and take that horse add a horn to it, we call this the imagination, the re-association of images differently than they are received by perception. But when it comes to more subatomic structures that are in a different and more primal dimension, to what sense we have a physical in influence on these become more abstract.
The brain is precisely the place where the structure of the atom is restructured. Ideas literally are the activity of restructuring atoms. The brain in relation to its external environment, the universe, is held by an infinitesimal spectrum. This means that ideas in the quantum state are at the most microscopic material form. As ideas relate with each other, or rather, when ideas conflict to form contradictions, such a process develops momentum and mass. Use Newton’s second law of motion-