Section 53 (last updated 02.24.2021)
Atoms “mini” minds
Negations- atoms mini thoughts
The subjective represents the identity of thought that attributes the negation upon itself. Negation is not the denial of something as its grammatical meaning seems to suggest but it is rather the physical force of determining a change onto the thing to make it different, abstracting many forms from one, or mathematically division, multiplication etc. Are all negations: The power of abstraction is the positive element of doubt. In the mind, abstraction is the act of searching and finding actual forms and transforming those into potential forms. The mind does this by duplicating its consciousness into potential derivatives of possible outcomes taking on different positions in relation to each other. This multiplicity of thought is the quality of what physics calls atoms.
Ancient atomism used to claim that atoms are thoughts because it was mind that makes the placement of the atoms into categories and they took this crude capacity as meaning that mind is what fills the atom with its category, represents it and therefore an atom was an idea from thought. The idea of thought for the Greek was also not something personal or subjective, in other words, it was not a subjective capacity of an individual human being. Thought is more general constituting a universal substance, I.e., all things have an idea to them irrespective of an individual grasping that or not.
Derivatives are duplicative because they are particular scenarios of the same underlining substance.
When thought applies negation in relation to itself, it is really deriving possible simulations, placing itself in them, and remains passive implying hypothesis about its situation. The negation is the principle of thought that maintains it an inherently indivisible substance because the act of negation is the extension of the object that forms its indivisibility.
This is the case because once thought is in the act of contradiction it is now in the situation of acting, and this is equally an environment where thought is only conducive to itself by the nature of its intention is at the same time it’s decision.
The term “decision” is synonymous with the word “resolution”, they are synonyms of each other, the latter is used to define the former, when you make a decision, that itself is a resolution.
The development of the conception in nature
A few things are commonly said to describe molecules.
A molecule is an electrically neutral group of three or more atoms held together by chemical bonds.
A “chemical” is defined as A) different identifications of material composition. B) the ways in which they interact. And C) how their interactions form new substances.
A chemical is therefore the interaction between two or more identifiably distinct compositions of matter that result in a new reaction distinct from the two components in the interaction. For example, if a corrosive substance is brought into contact with skin, than it causes a burn. The burn is not present in the substance on its own independent from the hand, the corrosive substance may perhaps be alkaline or acidic, which may cause burns, but the burn is not inherent in the chemical as a distinct composition of matter. The hand likewise on its own is not burned, it may have soft tissue that is capable of being burned and therefore corroded, but on its own it does not involve the burn. Now bring the chemical into contact with the hand, and the reaction of a burn results which is an altogether different and distinct composition from the two components involved in the interaction, without them it would not be there, but with them, it is something altogether distinct. This odd example shows what it means a simple change or new result that arises from the simple contact of two physical compounds with different properties.
The question is, why is it, or how is it, that the mere contact of compositions with different properties produce drastic and uniquely distinct reactions from their source? The physical scientist answer that the proof is in the pudding, the reaction is simply a consequence , there is no deeper explanation other than when two different things come into contact, a different result occurs, it is self evident. If I fall heavy on the ground, my hand coming hard into contact with the ground causes it to break, there is nothing deeper about the result other than the way the hand is composed with a less density than the ground, which is heavier, and a heavier and more dense compositions breaks down a less dense with lighter mass.
However there is something deeper about any new reaction that arises out of the interaction of things because this describes fundamental change. A reaction that arises out of an interaction is a generation of a new thing into being, objects do not just interact, but their basic interactions, and at more fundamental levels, their mere contact, conceives into being new forms, their interactions are conceptions of changes.
Molecules are components of matter that make up organic substances. However the majority of familiar solid substances on Earth, including most of the minerals that make up the crust mantle, core. contain many chemical bonds, but are not made of identifiable molecules atoms may also be held together by chemical bonds with no presence of any definable molecule, nor any of the regularity of repeating units that characterizes crystals.The theme of repeated unit-cellular-structure also holds for most condensed phases with Metallic bonding which means that solid metals are also not made of molecules.
Molecules are different forms of conceptions connected together to form a logical form structuring the world in certain way.
Their interactions form the shape of the structure, and how that matter will as-ethically appear
If we take water for example, from an ordinary scale it looks like a continuous homogeneous liquid plain which disperses into slashes if discrete droplets when touched, freezes into ice when cold, evaporates into gas when heated etc., all these reactions are caused from the molecules structure changing its interactions. However this mechanical view does not answer as to how the change in molecules configuration causes such a difference in the physical state because than the molecules themselves must be different in physicality that to explain them as the same fundamental building blocks reaffirms the need to answer the fundamental difference in physicality in the first place.
How can gas be so different than water in physicality while their molecules have the same physicality with each other? The point is not that since the elements have such different physical structures their molecules structures must also be different, the former does not necessarily have to presuppose the former, because it can be soundly stated that the molecules may have the same physicality while the change in their configuration cause a change in the physicality of the product of that configuration.
As the molecule and the result of its configurations can be held to be two different things, they do not have to behave the same across all levels of analysis. However the mere change in configuration of the molecules does not alone answer how the result of those configuration, whether it be the gas or the liquid, can exhibit such drastic difference in physicality, like why is one wet while the other dry etc., in order for these properties to be conferred requires a conception which agrees that water is wet across all levels of its physicality, the observer external to the water must agree it is wet with the molecules that configure to conceive water as wet, their agreement is the fact that water is wet, meditating between two scales of conception. The molecular state that makes water wet must agree with the external observer that experiences water as wet.
The blob of water is the external relations of the molecules interactions and is the outer appearance, it is the wavelength state of the particle state. The water is the “conception” of its molecules, these molecules are living micro-orbs,
Micro-orbs are everywhere
The molecules interact together and they bear a result distinct from them.
Molecules are the form of conceptions, they are “little” thoughts, proposals or propositions about what the world ought to be like, and they come into conflict, or rather contradictions, which resolves in the structures their contradictions with one another provide.
We characterize that hydrogen and oxygen are the molecules in water. H2O is the actual state of water, but in a potential state, water is an idea implicit in hydrogen respectively independent from oxygen. In other words, hydrogen has an idea of what water like substance ought to be like, and this forms a complication into oxygen, which arises as a disagreement, or a different idea of how a water like substance ought to be like. Their disagreement confers into the actual state of water we experience and categorize as H2O.
And this is not just a mere mixture but a progressive process as some chemicals are more fundamental than others. This means that hydrogen is not just taken as one component and is mixed with oxygen as another component, and their solution forms water. This depiction is an abstraction because hydrogen is complicated in oxygen and only through that it becomes H2O, in other words, hydrogen is a more primal state in time than oxygen, and these two time periods in the development of chemical compounds come together and form a future time phases
Hydrogen is just simply the form of two opposing conceptions sharing a medium, or a relation. According to Hegel this relation is known as a “reflection”, not only in physical reflection where the image of the same object is portrayed on the surface of another object, but also in logic concerning how two different things come to represent the same meaning. Their disagreement may be in conflict with a further disagreement, we can say oxygen, which is a result of the hydrogen disagreement in the first place, but now developed to disagree with its predecessor to form an new offspring relation.
The dialectical relation is not simply from 2 arrives 1, as commonly understood, the synthesis is a result of the thesis and antithesis conflict. We have to demonstrate how this logical form is quantified, or develops in terms of quantities, separate entities in space and their relation in time because their relations in space makes them into distinct objects separated by space with different identities, and in time, their is an ordinal order in terms of what came first as opposed to later. All these aspects must be considered as instantaneously concurring as part of the dialectical process.
When we say out of two came one, like out of the father and mother came out a child, this is merely a quantitative account, that there is an addition to a previous quantity. However in terms of quality, out of 2 came 1 means that 1 is the identity of 2, either in the sense that the number 2 is itself one and a single number, and that the components that add to each other are each 1 and a single number. So that the thesis and antithesis are the same identity and it is this that is the synthesis
The synthesis is something distinct in two related things that are distinct from each other and so it is what they are initially but as their unifying force
in nature molecules do not exists on their own apart from their element. Oxygen is always derived from either air or water or whatever element; when in water it always has a bound with hydrogen, and when in air it is always bound with nitrogen.
For example if we examine properties of hydrogen and oxygen, we see in each chemical features that contradict but conflate to form what later is the solution of water.
Oxygen is not Flammability Does not burn, Conductivity : A poor conductor of heat and electricity. Denser than hydrogen, oxygen is more humid because is denser than air.
Hydrogen is highly Flammable a highly combustible diatomic gas, more alkaline since it is lowest density of any chemical
The high combustibility of hydrogen with the humid like density of oxygen causes it solidify into a pure liquid form, water.
Condensation
Hydrogen is cooler than oxygen causes condensation-
Oxygen changes from a gas to a liquid at a temperature of -182.96°C (-297.33°F)
While
Hydrogen changes from a gas to a liquid at a temperature of -252.77°C (-422.99°F)
need to lose some energy from very excited gas atoms. The easy answer is to lower the surrounding temperature. When the temperature drops, energy will be transferred out of your gas atoms into the colder environment. When you reach the temperature of the condensation point, you become a liquid.
This is why a chemical is called a “solution”
solution is a special type of homogeneous mixture composed of two or more substances. In such a mixture, a solute is a substance dissolved in another substance, known as a solvent. The mixing process of a solution happens at a scale where the effects of chemical polarity are involved, resulting in interactions that are specific to solvation. The solution usually has the state of the solvent when the solvent is the larger fraction of the mixture, as is commonly the case. One important parameter of a solution is the concentration, which is a measure of the amount of solute in a given amount of solution or solvent.
(Add uncertainty principle)
Atoms are conceptions
The form of a Particles is to contain the information of an event. The form of an atom is the conception of event as object. Ideas arise from the potentiality of uncertainty by forming themselves as the certain experiences for the conception. Flow of particles is how ideas emerge from the necessity of reason to constitute the experience of conception.
Every atom is an idea and a species of atoms are the variability of inverse determinations all concerning the same conception. The reason why some element for example has a species of atoms and not just consist of one one atom that represents it as some pre-Socratic used to speculate, is because to constitute one element requires every possibility of it to be concurred. Hydrogen atoms are all the possible differences taken by the same determinations, and in spacetime, there is spectrum of the determination reaching the most outskirts extent of magnitude away from itself to the most minute internal point relation with itself.
Particles are fundamentally light energy which is the bare form of a conception and the form which the content of the idea is contained.
Ionization is defined as process by which an atom acquires a negative or positive charge by gaining or losing electrons to form ions. (Explain ion add here) Ionization describes how ideas emerge into reality to form the next experience for the observer. This is the mechanics of how a conception transitions into another one. When an atom is gained or lost that is a change in the event which is the change of one idea to another in the duration of the conception. How can the change of one idea to another constitute a stable duration for the continuity of the experience? This is explained by the nature of an ion which is an atom with a net electric charge due to the loss or gain of one or more electrons. This means that the change of one event to another is related by constant substance implied by the differences in the duration of the change.
The activity of loosing and gaining is presumed from a stable environment where the gain and loss do not collapse or annihilate each other to distort the order of their pattern. For example if we have positive followed by negative and then negative the pattern is broken but this does not happen because positive leaves a net presupposition where the negative following a negative is still a positively moving forward step, and so the positive arises again after the negative as the presupposition for its postulation.
The continuum of particles determinable by non linearity of time forms structure, a quality. The gain or loss of an electron actually forms an avenue, which is an addition to the form.
When the electron shoots out it produces with it a path, a passage of nature. by studying electricity passing through gases, that all atoms contain certain particles, called electrons, that carry a negative electric charge. Because atoms are electrically neutral, there must be balancing positive charges somewhere in the atom.(Joseph J. Thomson (1856-1940) discovered (1897)
law of multiple proportions, which states that when several distinct reactions take place among the same elements, the quantities that enter the reactions are always in the proportions of simple integers – that is, 1 to 1, 2 to 1, 2 to 3, and so on. From this came the concept that such reacting quantities contain equal numbers of atoms and are therefore proportional to the masses of individual atoms. Dalton gave the lightest known element, hydrogen, anatomic weight of 1, and developed comparative atomic weights for the other known elements accordingly.
The atomic number is the dimension (find definition of weight Aristotle?)
equal volumes of different gases, under the same conditions of pressure and temperature, contain equal numbers of atoms. the Avogadro number.
studies using gas discharge tubes. In such tubes, a gas at low pressure is subjected to intense electrical forces. Under these conditions, various coloured glows are observed to traverse the tube. One blue glow at one end of the tube, around the electrode known as the cathode, was observed for a wide variety of gases. The glow involve a stream of negatively charged particles with a charge-to-mass ratio, indicating the existence of a particle with a very small mass on the atomic scale. These particles are called electrons, and they were soon recognized to be a constituent of all atoms. That is, atoms are not indivisible but contain parts. The role that an electron plays as a part of the atom is its dimension to surpass the bound of certain quantity. The electron being a part of the atom suggests that the atom is divisible but in a very special way, the atom is divisible only as an other, but as itself distinct from the other it is indivisible. Its divisibility is therefore a transcendence beyond itself to be an other while being distinct.
Each atom is a form of conception. In a quantum realm the path of an electron is an extension of the changes of the conception into different determination
The continuum of size and organizational level appears throughout the range of structural elements from the fundamental particles to the highest-level systems of matter is developmental relation of the idea to the conception. The logical structure of ideas bond to each other to form the structures for the conception. Language works exactly like the way subatomic quanta forms together an element. The transition of one conception to another, which is equally the change in the conception, invariably forms structures that are the content of its experience. The structures produced as result during the change of the conception are at the same times the very experiences of the conception.
In language the the basic constituents are the alpha-bets. These alphabets are the fundamental ingredients of any word so that to form a word requires the pronunciation of it. Pronunciation is to utter the sound denoted by each particular letter in the alphabet in the order of the letters conjunction assumed by the structure of the word. Each word is a specific order of alphabets that when the specific sound of each alphabet is asserted in the particular relations defining the word, we have a unique meaning.
equally the conception contained by the form of the particles are all the different ideas resolving into each other to form the structures of the object for their experience.
http://neutrino.aquaphoenix.com/un-esa/universe/universe-chapter3.html
Electron- electricity passing through gas. The elements are passages of nature to each other (add spacetime fabric of everything “magazine”)
Superposition
The concept of “superposition” in quantum mechanics is an explanation of how the abstractive quality discloses the quantitive measures. In other words how the abstract transcends to determine the concrete
Superposition explains how operation and system are distinguishable from each other. It is in modern times used to shows how an automatic operations characterizes linear systems. In mathematics Linear systems are any two or more functions involving the same set of variables. Faculties like perception are linear systems because they involve the same objects as their conception but before expanding on this, it is important to explain how the concept of superposition shows how the particular composition of physical bodies are disclosed by their abstraction, abstract processes.
The superposition is usually explained in the following way. The net result of two or more determinations is equally the sum total of what each determination would of caused individually. This means that a single effect of two or more causes is their relation. This is a difficult notion to understand because our acquaintance with the idea of causation is limited to the quantitive measure where one body comes out of two separate ones, which does not show how the one body discloses the relation of the two separate ones that gave rise to it.
The idea of the superposition is fundamentally dialectical which means that in each body exists the relation that gave rise to it, the single body is a component of a relation implicit within it. A very tricky notion but constitutes the very building blocks of nature, molecules fundamentally take on this form. (Add here on ion from work geometry shapes implicit in shapes)
(Add to ionization above)
The water molecular is a perfect demonstration of the symmetry of superposition, which in this case of a polar molecular its asymmetry describes (define polar molecules )
The oxygen contains all the possibilities of hydrogen; having a differentiation from itself. The self relation of hydrogen is differentiation by all the possibilities disclosed by oxygen. Implicit in hydrogen is the molecular structure of oxygen. Hydrogen contains all the relations required to form oxygen, yet hydrogen stands outside this relation implicit in itself as a component differentiated from itself as a component external from the relation of possibilities forming oxygen implicit within hydrogen.
Oxygen as the set of possible relations of hydrogen constitutes the unity of hydrogen with itself as a component abstracting these possibilities into a single body standing externally from those possible relations. Hydrogen is first differentiated from the sum of its possibilities, oxygen, as a net result of them. Hydrogen as net result so far discloses the sum set of possibilities of oxygen is unified with itself as a differentiated net result of them because of the sum total of possibilities of oxygen.
molecule of hydrogen fluoride (HF), the red represents partially negatively charged regions, while blue represents partially positively charged regions.
Not all atoms attract electrons with the same force. The amount of “pull” an atom exerts on its electrons is called its electronegativity. Atoms with high electronegativities – such as fluorine, oxygen, and nitrogen – exert a greater pull on electrons than atoms with lower electronegativities such as alkali metalsand alkaline earth metals. In a bond, this leads to unequal sharing of electrons between the atoms, as electrons will be drawn closer to the atom with the higher electronegativity.
Because electrons have a negative charge, the unequal sharing of electrons within a bond leads to the formation of an electric dipole: a separation of positive and negative electric charge.
A fundamental charge is carried by a single proton, or equivalently, the magnitude of the electric charge carried by a single electron. The fundamental charge is a self determination and in this way also called “elementary positive charge” because it is the constructive force, unlike partial charge which is the net atomic charge are created due to the asymmetric distribution of electrons in chemical bonds. The negation which follows the fundamental positive charge is the space not occupied by it, which is taken up as a partial charge. (Add to superposition of sphere)
Cell environment “mini” mind
Cell environment “mini” mind
Knot infinity
This is the reason for the symbol of infinity being a kind of knot.
The unknoting of the nothing. To “unknot” here is synonym for revelation. The revelation of nothing brings light to it. This metaphorical speech used in religion are in some sense proven scientifically literal. (this is also the form that genetic DNA material takes, microbes and micro life take, the nucleus consists of this form in a bundle)
we see the process of infinite unknotting explicitly in genetic information is read.
Every finite part necessary for the organism is derived from an infinite process, DNA. Infinity of finites.
Unlike all other parts of the cell the structure of the nucleolus is not really definite other than being a bundle of genetic information, which in variability is known to be infinite. The nucleus of a cell maintains the same integrity as nucleus of atomic structures.
the nucleus is the internal relation, the implicit nature both of the atom and the cell, the atom being the more fundamental foundation of the cell.
In fact, the cell is the idea of the atom, the environment, the evolution of the atom. It is becoming more actualized. Our notion of size is obscured because the understanding in order to apprehend the order for the world places it from small to big or from big to small. But the world even for our perception does not necessarily appear this way. size as bring a spectrum from small to big or big to small is an abstraction of the world limited to the perception of objects within events compared to each other. But the general picture of objects in events discloses that there is a jumple of all different kinds of sizes determined not first determined this way or that way but in all ways.
Our need to say that the world developed form an infinitely large place to an infinitesimally smaller place or from an infinitesimally smaller place to an infinitely larger place is precisely an advanced abstraction. What we actually find is that human form is somewhere in the middle between an infinitely large universe and an infinitesimally minute dimensions. As to the question of which came before the other is like asking whether the egg is before the chicken or the chicken before the egg. The true matter of fact is that the world does not evolve in this way than that way, but in all ways simultaneously. In fact, the infinite and infinitesimal are extreme conceptions of the same substance. The world so far as an ethically universal system, develops towards the middle, the center of sphere being the potential place of the circumference.
The neclus is the infinite princple the source of production of finite features. It is the conserved principle the nothing that is being, and around it is the growth of the idea of its world. (add before this the black hole and light wraped around it as the first indication of this form, being explict nothing implcit, nothing consiounsess, being reason, both in determiantion of each other)
Inside the nucleolus is the atomic nucleus, the latter is foundation of the former, the former is the actualization of the latter. The cell is the world of the atom, the idea of itself.
Reading of information by making infinite into finites, finites of infinity.
unknotting of infinity to derive finite information
Durations of infinite minds- cell “mini” mind.
Components such as atoms, molecules etc. are understood in reference to mind. As per our logical principle of identity as the core function of the universe as self-exciting circuit, we have the conception of something is identical with the substance of conception. The “mind” becomes nebulous concept if it is to be understood as the mechanism that conceives its phenomena from the “outside”, the difference of mind from its phenomena becomes really the differences comprising phenomenas, leaving us with no understanding of what the mind is other than the phenomenons we took to be its conceptions. The Philosophy of mind therefore becomes really a matter of complexity of consciousness, the angles of conception defines its self-reflection. A cell is a “little” brain, the function of the cell is the idea of it as a mind exhibited for consciousness. Idea and mind are indivisible, for every idea there is a reciprocal mind. In mathematics, the use of “reciprocal” means quantity or function related to another so that their product is one. The quantity obtained by dividing the number 1 by a given quantity.
The reciprocal of a number is: 1 divided by the number
Examples:
• the reciprocal of 2 is 1/2 (half)
• the reciprocal of 10 is 1/10 (=0.1)
Every number has a reciprocal except 0 (1/0 is undefined)
The reciprocal is shown as 1/x, or x-1
When we multiply a number by its reciprocal we get 1
Example: 3 times 1/3 equals 1
Also called the “Multiplicative Inverse”
(The infinity of mirrors is how the microscopic cells are configured, )
This is how cells are lined up. Zooming into cells is like going into infinity.
Each frame never exactly picks out the same thing but always slightly picks out something different, even though each frame concerns the same thing.
Two-dimensional structure of cell. Which is only abstraction because its structure is multidimensional to form the dynamic form of bodies. Bodies are movements of cell.
Cells as dimension of infinite minds
Antibody for example is flexible in its physical composition so that it conforms to the structures of bacteria and virus (check if true).
It is remarkable that when we empirically examine the nature of cells under a microscope, we see that individually they exhibit a physical composition different than the form where the whole of relations between cells exhibit for our ordinary sensations. The homogeneous relation between cells form what appears to have the unique as-ethical values comprising regular objects like organ, a body part, an organism etc.
An individual skin cell under microscope looks different than skin as normally seen by perception. Even though skin is comprised of skin cells we cannot say that a skin cell is identical with skin. This distinction is however an abstraction because at the subatomic level, the mind and its idea are for its macroscopic conception identical. The cell looks like the idea it exhibit, this is written in its function.
The cell is a mini mind of the idea it exhibits. The cell is so consumed by the operations of its function that its body and the idea of its activity are identical.
The mind is the womb of the idea
A double-rod pendulum animation showing chaotic behavior. Starting the pendulum from a slightly different initial condition would result in a completely different trajectory. The double-rod pendulum is one of the simplest dynamical systems with chaotic solutions. (This shows that no matter of the chaotic patterns of some given activity the result is the quality of an ideal form the latter is the aim initiating the activity. Drawing line in random pattern still produces a solid filled shape, the solidity itself being the order.)
Timelines suggest that the passage of time involves the same motion as that of spatial extension, that one end of the timeline makes its way to the other end and there we have the extent of the duration. This is Newton’s first law of motion that “Every object moves in a straight line unless acted upon by a force”. Aristotle early on found that it is not obvious what the first cause of this primary motion is but fundamentally has to do with the logical principles of necessity- it is the premise of demonstration for motion- the premise “cannot be otherwise” because it is not proven yet, so the fact of its indeterminacy, being true and false itself cannot be otherwise, for anything otherwise is as the law of non-contradiction states, is either one or the other- true or false- but cannot be neither true or false or both,
But if we equate motion as the principle of cause, we see that there is infinite complexity of form. Motion of becoming seems to harden in density not merely in mass but the content of mass so far as being clusters of varying qualities relate together to form the quality of their relations. There is an acceleration of quality with the duration of motion. It cannot be said that space is an already established passage presentable to the extent of time without the qualification of how space so far as being the extension of time takes on the form of its duration.
According to special relativity the duration of space is not understandable without the temporal extension of time because the latter determines the rate, degree and consistency of the former. Time insofar as it is an activity exhibits the form in which space warps onto and around. The duration of form does not undertake passage from one point into another point, like a man crossing the road to get the the other side. The activity of fading in and out of being does not exhibit the duration of an object moving across space from one location to another. Instead the duration of form concerns the generating into existence, the presentation and transformation of the idea. Only from this conception we can say that the properties of locomotion are scenarios of this duration. In order for the point to be extended as the line, we first have to explain the more fundamental nature of how the point bears the form of sphere. (Alan watts says the activity fading in and out of being for consciousness)
The process of photosynthesis is a quantum process.
Photosynthesis occurs when the plant secrete water from the soil into droplets, and these water droplets formulate onto the leafs of the plant and absorb light. When the light is absorbed by the water droplets on the leaf of the plant, the mixture of carbon dioxide, light and water produce glucose. This energy containing sugar molecules is a snythziation of light, carbon dioxide and water, which when combined together create something unique then any of the individual compounds used to make it. The synthesis process between light, water and carbon dioxide is a quantum process- meaning that it occurs infinitesimally in the plants discrete part.
We know that plants convert sunlight into chemical energy, but how does light exactly turn into the sugar chemical needed for plants. Sure oxygen and water are supplied but the process of turning light into chemical happens in the quantum state, meaning that at the smallest possible size between the sunlight making contact with the flower, something happens to synthesize the elements near the plant with light to form chemical. What enables this synthesization?
Protocell
What is inside the nucleus? The nucleus is a dimension inside each cell into other cells or even into more fundamental realms like molecular and subatomic.
The potentiality of life is the actuality of Reason. The process of life begins with the development of the protocell. The protocell is the initial organic environment where life developed. The term “organic” is derived from the Ancient Greek term organikos which also means “instrument”, the suscitating for something to flourish. A protocell is a self-organized, ordered form within, spherical collection of lipids proposed as a stepping-stone toward the origin of life.
The protocell is endogenous within inorganic matter as a point where all the infinite potentialities of what life form can be, the shapes, sizes, kind, all the information that goes into forming a gene, pass through this cell and organize into becoming a living thing. This protocell can exists anywhere in the universe and does not require the conditions that earth offers, although in order for it to transform into a living organism it does need those perfect conditions. Within the protocell there is a process of natural selection, which is all the possible features that can go into making up an animal reaches a limit, this limit is that when you have an infinite amount of possible quantities, the limit of that is a finite and particular kind of quality. Because a finite qualities is particular because it is conceived and therefore and selected to be the essence of a quantity, which otherwise would be indeterminate and and can be anything and everything.
The opposite to this idea is the idea that chaos or randomness is that which produces order, that in fact randomness is first and order comes after. Explain how randomness is in fact a sufficient condition itself and cannot be a necessary condition.
(Add section life is at home with itself in the universe). The protocell finds its ground in which it can become itself. (Refer to section of self reproduction than sexual reproduction which gave rise to all the animal life) , (p.92 observing nature, phen of mind). The universally and activity is not merely an observation but the very nature of what is organic.
The essence of the basic elements for life- What necessary environment is developed for the necessary grounds for life? Understanding how the molecular structure of the basic elements in nature serves to portray their essence will indicate how each element works to serves the grounds for life. Water expands outwards when made into solid; this portrays the kind of quality water assumes, that is, it is the form of receiving, that is every atomic configuration is that which receives something other than itself not for itself but for that other. This is why it is associated as the basic element of life. Whereas fire possess the atomic configuration that characterizes that what is meant by destructive. When we think of something being destroyed we think of it ceasing and no longer existing, however what is destructive in and of itself is the rearrangement of a particular entity into it’s very basic elements. This is for example why fire relapses heat, which is the result of the destructive nature of atoms with each other. The destructive nature of fire serves as necessity for the receiving nature of water. The heat released from the sun, or stars in general in relation to their planetary bodies, given a particular distance and locomotion in the space time continuum, is the determining element for the kind of nature associated with each planet.
Planets that are farthest from their star do not receive enough heat and any liquid prerequisite to water either becomes gases or solid in which the lack of receiving heat indicates the reception of itself as that soild state, it already received that lack of receiving and therefore became the kind of itself that no longer receives. Whereas something closes to the star or sun receives too much heat becoming destructive to anything else to receive as solid. Something that is moderate distance from the star receive the necessary kind of heat in relation to cool so as to synthesizes the nature of the liquid with the soild, thst synthesis is water (H2O). The synthesis of the gas hydrogen, with the very pure form of matter-oxygen, constitutes the structure of liquid water, which is the very form which structures the primitive protocell because it is that which possess the nature of accepting something not for itself but for that which it is accepting. Even in the negative sense when we wash our hands it intakes the germs at the molecular level away.
The demonstration that water acts as the “universal solvent” is indicated in its transformation into different form; when liquid water turns into a solid its atoms expand outwards rather than inwards as most liquids do; the solid form is less dense than the liquid (http://www.chem1.com/acad/sci/aboutwater.html)
The process of natural selection that the protocell takes in the universe is seen in the ability for asteroids carrying molecular life that inter-transmits between planets to necessities life. With each planet that no longer is able to hold life given its distance from its star and other variables. The development of the protocell does not start over with each planet that is unable to sustain it, rather that these astorides are the very organic matter from the planet. The organic exists at the same time with the inorganic.
Every species culminated in that species which is of all species, the species being. The human being developed into particulars so as to take on the thought of the dialectic. (Refer to section of culture as consciousness of nature resulting in the development of science: the very notion of self-consciousness).
The point of views associated with each individual is not of the individual, that in fact although the human being differs in their material manifestation, which is the very defineing nature of matter as potentiality as indicated above, the human being as a species is universal. The human being as the species of all species is self-consciousness. Thus far it is identified what self-consciousness is but not how it is in contradiction with consciousness. The only way being is becoming so as to become itself is from the excluding itself from itself. Is to enable itself as something other than itself, so that this very other actualizes itself. This is the only necessity in which it can confirm the existence of itself, it is the test to its being, the motion to its becoming.