Section 44 (last updated 2.14.2021)
Motion is generation
(Add to Sphere in a vacuum)
Ingression- the object is the passage of the event Into recognition . “Objects are what they are because events are what they are”
nature is such that there can be no events and no objects without the ingression of objects into events. for whitehead the discrimination of objects separated from events is an abstraction of an ingression where both objects and events are identically the same process of a passage of nature. In other words the recognition that there are distinct objects is identical with the duration of events having a time span. The question of ingression concerns where an object is as it happens not in terms of location but how an event itself is conceived as an object, the place of an event in time. For example how to discern a perfectly symmetrical object, like a sphere, moving in a vacuum? A sphere can only be discerned as moving in a vacuum relative to another object passing by it. An object moving in space is itself an event localized to the conception formed by it.
Where an object is, can be discerned by what it is, and the relations between objects are the form events assume to constitute a happening, or a reality.
An object in pure space cannot be discerned moving. Empirical experimental accounts show that within a vacuum, an object like a ball for example having no relative position to any other object or that objects within it have no relative relation to each other, a blank balls, would be difficult to discern whether the object is accelerating or not in space.
This describes the nature of light because when light is alone in space, as a particle it has no relative position to any other object except space, and so against space it takes itself as the object it must move relative to and externalizes itself in place of the space while remaining identical, , it becomes a wave. Light becomes this constant of infinitely going beyond itself. This property of motion is the quality of reproduction. And light as we know has the property of generation in the world, e.g., photosynthesis, vitamin D for the body etc., among enumerable many other factors that life contributes to life.
From an absolute, or within a vacuum, there is no discrepancies between the conception and the object, that is, the mere concoction of a thing is simultaneously the being of that object. The question becomes where do we find a discrepancy between the conception and the object? Any particular thing that can be picked out, or abstracted, (explain whitehead abstraction) is where a discrepancy occurs because a form now distinguishes a particular event from the rest of all possible events. The understanding for example is a complex form of this discrepancy. The kind of being the conception is as an object is not one fixated on the object, otherwise the conception becomes reducible to the variability of that object and any explanations of having other variety of distinct objects become intangible (see Aristotle thought and object).
The being of an object is therefore a becoming and that is instantaneously the conception of it, or rather the conception of the object is simultaneously its becoming. The conception is on an elementary level the duration of longevity , how long an object last. During a duration of being a particular object, the conception breaks through and changes into the duration forming another object. What we have is that the conception is like the quality of penetrability. For example Light can penetrate any object; sound some objects etc. Penetrability is the external quality of a becoming. The internal is the object itself emerging into being, like the blossom of a flower, it comes out from within.
Light is the principle for reproduction
Lifeforms like plants depend on light to survive because they require it for reproduction. The reproduction of the species is synonymous with the survival of single plants. It is the substance things use to reproduce themselves. Duck uses light to become a duck
inertia of motion
Inertia is not empty, this is an abstraction, it is full of the possibilities that are at a stalemate with each other due to the fact that any one of which is real at any given moment, but not yet real, relative to the present of an observer. We see this that outside an observer, the further away from their recognition, the more things from his point of view are in a possible state, for example, when I am at home, god knows what is happening downtown. However if we take this as principle of chaos, than outside the recognition of every observer, different things are in a potential state, while the happenings of downtown are a potential from my view, they are real from my friends view who is directly there, however the events happening where I am are from his view potentials.
Inertia is the precondition of an object to fully express differing potential variations at the same time. Inertia is one of the first forms of simultaneity. Inertia concerns both a thing continuous in its existing state or uniform motion in a straight line unless that state is changed by an external force. What it means to be unchanged is a determination acting independently. When one force acts on another, we see those as an external relation, but the internal relation wherein they both belong as factors of the same thing is the contradiction between them, or the complexity between them.
The condition of remaining at rest is the setting, like a plain for a line, in which a particular relation carries out the variations of its potential forms. For example, when we take the three states of matter in an inertial state, we see that the same object is exhibiting at the same time all three states simultaneously, an ice cube is melting, while being solid, while in a state of evaporation. Aristotle’s idea of substance as an underlying substratum of all things combines form and matter as inversions if the same conception. Matter is the external relation disclosing a set of related qualities whereas form or the mental aspect is the internal both of which constitutes the same conception.
The reason an object can be expressive of varying states simultaneously is because the conception of those forms is acting relatively to the motion they bear in relation to each other.
This tells us that motion is the definite determination for a form to take on a dominate role in the conception of the object whereas inertia is the conception that remains independent from the factors as they superimpose each other in the determinations of the object.
(Add to Indras web)
The matter is the external relation is what the object is not as being perceived by another and this is simultaneously what the object expresses itself as to the other. The internal is what the object is in the sense of being the object, within it, being one with its expression, but in being inside its expression it is not the same with what is perceiving it’s expression, while being inside its expression it is perceiving an other while another is perceiving its expression.
as their substratum having itself a relation to another object also disclosing another variation of the relation between qualities. Motion fundamentally is the change of a quality, the alteration of one quality to another having as the extension of one separate object to the other. Take for example the atomic structure of the same compound.
What we see is that the molecules of water as the temperature changes from cold to hot, is the transition of the molecules closer together become further away from other other.
The motion of an ice cube freezing rather than melting determines it more in a solid state then the liquid state. Of course the three states of matter are all internally presuppose each other, but the question here concerns the point where in each state is simultaneous with the other while maintaining an identity. Motion Is the change of qualities an object undergoes throughout time.
Change in the being of a thing is truly what it means to be passing rather than locomotion which is the stability of a quality in the object as it bears an external Locomotion for example is more of an inertial state in the sense of quality generation because an object in locomotion is maintaining a certain quality and therefore form in the direction of a movement. Motion here is defined by the relation of two differentiated components exhibiting a change in contrast to each other. Ice in relation to the freezer exhibit a more solid state than liquid whereas ice in relation to the sun exhibits more of a liquid state. The condition of being solid or liquid in these scenarios for example are a direct relation between the ice cube and the sun or freezer. The ice cube against the freezer form the generation of the solid condition. The motion of an object is its relative conception to another object.
Subject to vacuum
Light
The initial logical stages of consciousness are directly invariable with the fundamental emergence of physical phenomenon. Theoretical physicists always like to subject phenomenon to a vacuum because this is a fundamental ontological derivation of being from nothing. In theoretical physics when light is applied to a vacuum this is among the first moves of demonstrating how motion constitutes energy.
There is however a contradiction, which Hegel did not only take to have a merely negative meaning but viably the positive meaning of a contra – contrary – and dictation – control- synthesized together to form the process of a dictation or governing derived from the opposition of contraries in a relation. This process is explained by the term “contradistinction” which means first distinguishing contraries from each other is the primary way of having contraries and by second, the difference of contraries is maintained not merely by having the opposites next to each other but prior by the meditating process itself constitutes the scope or vacuum where a difference is discernible. the meaning of “inverse” is introduced to denote how the meditating process constitutes contrary sides of the spectrum and how that spectrum is the self containment of the contrary sides of the same meditating from what it is to what it is not.
The ontological inverse relation between nothing and being is applicable in explaining the physical enigma of how light exhibits motion to harness energy or equally how energy itself is the light in motion- ionization radiation and radioactive decay (Add pierce colours on opposite sides meditating) if we subject light to a vacuum, how can we discern motion? It is a mistaken fallacy to reference the mechanics of locomotion to explain how motion originates in light because in a vacuum every time light extends to the area of where it is not, void, it becomes measurable as the same reference point of matter that requires explanation as to how motion is derived from, in other words we reaffirm the question by assuming that light simply extends to the void parts of the vacuum filling it because then we have a meditation between two contrary properties, the vacuum and light, where one is absent when the other is present. But if these two qualities are distinguished as being physically distinct from each other, then we already erred by presupposing their hypothetical relation wherein light is contained within void which is what scientist do when they subject light to vacuum.
Instead of locomotion which is a conception coming after the need to explain generation, Motion in the ancient sense in the metaphysics by Aristotle is elaborated as the initial conditions of becoming which explains how a thing originates. In order to properly explain how light constitutes energy we have to first discern how light becomes, and from that becoming derive energy and motion, which is what the experimentation of subjecting light to a vacuum is really after. A vacuum is a tunnel measuring the movement is presupposes from the phenomena it subjects throughout its duration. Light in a vacuum is the same as light as a wave. Constituting the form of a vacuum as a tunnel subjected light to transform into a wavelength, keep the vacuum a particle, and light appears in a particle state. The subjection of the void onto the phenomena is the same as the change of the conception affects change of the phenomena. Only in the moment capturing the becoming of light can we explain a moment of motion transferring into energy for work. But it is preceding the process of work itself, the doing of the activity, that is identical with its quality of what we mean by energy.
Any measurement of a principles is first derived by measuring what it is not because the act of measuring presupposes that a phenomena is not yet knowable. A phenomena is measured by its limit, from what it is not, is anything and everything, or all the possible behaviours of what it could be demonstrates what it is as a sequence of behaviours. If we take the the initial point of nothing, this is correlated with the physical motion of a singularity being the potential energy of a thing, nothing is what being is potentially. In this first advance, nothing undergoes an externalization from what it is into what it is not, being. The self externalization is really at the same time a self expression.
Now being which is the self expression of nothing self externalized as an other, is not a negative contrary point that excludes itself by maintaining a nothing which is not a being and a being which is not nothing, but rather in the meditation from nothing advancing to being we have the first moment of an inversion, in the physical sense, direction, which is again not a movement of one object away from another because we are trying to explain the original generation of objects having a shared opposition.
The first moment of direction as an inversion provides the initial overview wherein the energy in light constitutes motion. Theoretical physics whenever speak of finding motion in light always reference the fact that motion is found microscopically within the atomic structure of light, behaviour of photons- ionization.
The conception that light exhibits a magnitude disclosing a macroscopic dimension extending into a minute degree brings up the concept of infinitesimal continuum. In the idea of the infinitesimal the self externalization of being from nothing constitutes the first notion of 3-dimensional space. Light cannot be extended beyond a void because in doing so light simply reaffirms itself in a vacuum. the vacuum becomes the limit of light but not by standing beside it as a separated object because in order to be so both must occupy a place in space, which then contains both void and light.
this meditation between light and void is the magnitude wherein light is disclosed by void and void is contained by light, this unity leaves us with the question that if light is the limit of the vacuum by every time expands beyond itself just simply reaffirms its original position, where is motion then found? light and vacuum prove to be the same continuum when they are as opposite determinations are inverse onto each other, which means that light no longer breaches beyond itself but turns its direction inwardly fills itself with itself (add Hegel light self external while remaining itself) and has the first moment of magnitude. The self inversion of
Light into itself is the direction now a third principle coming out of the one dimensional relation of being indivisible from nothing as it’s self expression, which of course is also two dimensional because of the contrast of nothing what it was and being what it is. Light beam for example, proton.
In the schwarzschild radius the perspective of void as a particle is the self identity of the nothing, but the void as a tunnel it becomes the extension outside itself as expressing what it is, being, or lack of thing, and becomes empty space. This change in the void from particle to a wave is a change in perspective of consciousness, when the perspective is of nothing, it knows even that is being, therefore turns from the nothing of the perspective which is before it as identical with itself and turns onto what it knows itself as the being conceiving that in hopes of finding something other there. When it finds being it realizes that being was the very meditation set itself of stepping out from nothing into finding something, and therefore comes to the realization that it’s being is pure capacity, or in physical terms energy. As to how it actualizes that energy is done by conceiving it into realization, when it looks for a certain being it is met by it and there is no difference as to whether that being always potentially there or became actually there at the moment. How a thing comes into being concerns the discovery that it’s always been there
When light inverses the perspective of its motion not by merely being outside itself in a void but by going inwardly into itself fulfilling a containment of itself, it realizes the first moment of self-determination, which is origination of a composite physical form. (Light sphere electron whitehead) a body has now the capacity of free motion, proton (does proton has free motion) with the quality of self-containment also comes being self absorbed, now we have from one determination an array of physical Qualities.
Nothing
#39- Nothing, when we speak of the term Nothing, what does that mean? Is nothing the devoid of something, the absence of a “thing”? Is nothing a negation of some being, so that it is the other of being. Metaphysically the concept of nothing has concrete reality and has an actual existence in the world. So it is important to understand what this concept is as a principle in the world. If the concept of Nothing bears a concrete existence in the world, it can only be understood logically because we indicated at the onset that existence itself is inherently logical. What we mean by logic in metaphysics is not something up for debate as it is clear that the laws of thinking are deducible from first principles that are in an and of themselves true- they are self evidently true. Nothing logically coexists as something, and we show that each category presupposes a next, like numbers do…
Reason presents itself as Nature in the world. The term Nature according to Plato is something general- it means the whole universe: Socrates says… (timaus).
Nature is an evolutionary process. It begins with reason with nothing, which coexists with something, so now we have two principles that are identical with each other. This identical nature is the recognition that it exists alone, which formulates the Self. The recognition that it is alone relative to nothing, that it is either the Self or nothing, is at the same time the recognition of what is that which is the self? The self is anything that is nothing, but because anything that is something coexists relative to nothing, a void always remains in anything. The Self, the I=I, is inherently intent, an activity for what is itself. But because what is the Self is anything that can be, reason is the intent for its own infinitude.