Section 52 (first updated 02.21.2021)
Void Consciousness
The blackhole model is the objective form of consciousness.
The idea of the “blackhole” is the materialistic expression of the mental alternative, i.e,. consciousness.
The form of reason involves the object, the conception, encapsulated by the void, the consciousness. This is true at the universal and the particular level insofar as the latter is the finite expression of the infinite former. However, at the level of the blackhole model, we notice that the void is NOT the inner relation, but is rather externally encapsulates all things within itself.
The conception of the known universe for consciousness. What is contained in the blackhole, i.e., void are the conceptions of consciousness, the ideas manifested as objects of the universe.
The term “universe” originally means for the Ancient Greeks “the all” or “all things”. The black void around is the form of the object, and consciousness is the potential reason that generates the development for the world. Let us take an example of the same model, but from a particular conception in the world.
Anthropological Error
Anthropology today deals with the comparative models between human cultures, however it does this without a true understanding of human nature in general. Human culture is a byproduct of human nature, not the other way around. Therefore, anthropology, in order to truly depict a proper com person between human cultures, must first have a proper understanding of human nature, which is the unifying principle of cultures. All cultures share in the universal notion of human nature. Human nature is difficult because it is unlike any other species of comparison because within it there are more diversity than the diversity that marks the differences between all species in the animal kingdom.
It is true that there are vast genetic and physical differences between the varying species constituting the animal kingdom, however, the mental capacity of the individual members of the same species if generally homogeneous amongst all animals. Most animal possess generally the same mental capacities between the distinct members of the species. However, humans beings are unique because each member expresses a unique and vast difference in mental capability when compared to other members of the same species.
The anthropological error is the assumption that species are only differentiated by their external relations, ie., their genetic or physiological features; rather than their more internal relations, i.e, mental or psychological implications. The darwinian methodology looks at what is empirically applicable amongst distinct species, and compares them based on perceived features apparent for observation. However, it does NOT look for the originating cause for the development of these features; and when it does offers an answer, it uses another set of externalities, say the environment or adaption, as the causes for the development of animal features.
The evolutionary idea of “use and disuse” (Lamarck), although inconclusive, is a step in the right direction because at least, it implies that mind is a determining factor in the causal relation of physically developed features. The mind, even if unconsciously decides to use or refrain from using certain bodily traits, results in the continued existence and/or development of those traits. To say that mind somehow causes the development of physiological traits is a vague and incomplete claim on its own. However, if it is followed thoroughly to the end, it is necessarily the right conclusion.
History before history
Contemporary anthropology estimates that human civilization begins with the Sumerian tradition because they are the first civilization that we have empirical evidence of keeping written records. They have written language and codes imprinted on tablets that we can decipher and ultimately understand. In this way, ancient iraq characterizes the beginning of the present modern world. However, the idea of “human” is NOT limited to 6,000 thousands years old.
Civilizations before ancient Babylon are deemed archaic and underdeveloped because they do NOT meet the criteria for a civilization since they do NOT have recorded history. Record of history in this way is equal to actually existing in history. However, this view is limited because of our inability to understand the structures and societies left behind buried by the earths magma. These ancient structures are NOT primitive “stone” buildings, but that over certain thousands of years, any material can turn into stone due to natural calcification. Behind the callus of these “stones” could be an advanced substance beyond our cohmphernsion, and the purpose of these structures, like the pyramids, might possess functions beyond our apprehension.
Ancient Mathematics
The ancient(s) across all different cultures with different implications, nevertheless agreed in the universal language of mathematics. All ancient civilizations had mathematics. We do NOT include civilizations before the Sumerian’s as part of history because there is no written record of them. Even in the oldest pre-modern civilizations had implemented universal mathematics in the structure and design of their agriculture and architecture, at the least. Our modern anthropology today is limited because it does NOT take into account the deeper notion of “human nature”, which is a notion deeper than anthropology because it is an ontological concept.
In the ancient times of old America (continent of americas), or rather what was happening in the North American continent prior to the oldest Sumerian times, was a rich and flourishing civilization that had mathematics. But unlike how we express mathematics today by written language, the North American civilizations did NOT have written language, or rather by symbolic demonstrations, these ancients demonstrated their understanding of mathematics in their production, so as we today, but they only had that, and so that is the reason we did not include them as part of history because we do not see them as fully self-conscious.
They were a more primitive people NOT in being less developed, but their developments are more primal, meaning at an earlier stage in evolution. The idea of “earlier” in this sense just means at a “prior” position on a linear sequence of time. It is our assumption that earlier moments in time also means less advanced than future moments, and our reasoning for this is that we “learn” from the past so as to enhance the future. we assume that history is a record keeping duration of time where previous moments carry precedent towards the advancement of the future. However, this experience might be a subjective anthropological trait extrapolated generally into the movement of world history.But their primitivism is only judged from a place of development far after the peak of which we depended on as a necessary stage to be at this current position, they had a different history but one which our history is a recourse. They were primitive in the nature of language but they were maximum in their labour skills.
Those ancient people implemented the universal truths of mathematics into their very productive forces, mainly their practical side. The structures they built was expressive of their mathematical understanding, and they exhibited mathematical paradoxes like “squaring the circle”. They were highly social in the sense there was absolutely no sense of individuality because they are around each other all the time having no privacy and dependent on that neighbour monitoring control allows for the control of nature. For example, you dependent on your neighbour to alert you of the incoming snake. They are able to control nature by monitoring it’s affect on their individuals. Think of it as the most advanced form of monkey grooming each other. These are the internal relations of nature and are fundamentally abstract in conception.
Response Nature
Nature is a system that responds to the individual organism within it by producing for it the reference frame of objects that externally interact with it. Viruses for example have seeds, a virus is an impeded life force within green life that consistently jumps around the objects popping-up into possibility within an observers reference frame. This possibility is the moment, or rather what occurs in a moment known as the event, and the observer being internally indifferent to it, externally manages the sum set of possible moments to fit a particular narrative or function. Nature is an abstract fixed self operating system that generates into possibility at any given moment a particular event objectified to the observer.
The observer is at the same time impeded in the spacetime fabric of nature, which exhibits itself for the observer an indeterminate state of uncertainty. In quantum physics called uncertainty principle, is the very fabric used to make the definite object, and so impeded in the object is a small radius, small NOT in size relative to the object, NOT size of shape, but rather microscopic at each point in the angular side of each point on the circumference of the squared circle. From these points forming the circumference of a shape is an angular momentum that a conception can enter and change into a different object.
Squared
The field of probability, which is the spectrum, each definite variable shares exactly with each other their potential variable. The formula of the “squaring the circle”. 4 squared is the same thing as 4^2 or 4×4. If something is squared, it means that it is multiplied by itself. The elementary of 4×4 is 16 brings about the same final result when stated in the form (4^2), the 2 on top of the four is just to suggest that four is four times, there are four of fours, and this ratio is a quantity of two. This is the same geometric function as the angle. This operator is more interesting than the number it relates and this is because the number 1 represents one of every quantity, or that every quantity no matter how numerous, is still characterized as 1 quantity . This number is squared against itself and this produces an equation of itself. This is the only number you can square and get the same result along with 0, of course which is the form in which this self multiplication happens.
The relations are therefore any kind, it is random the quantity of the number so long as they are being related in that principle way. The number is the bare function of a quantity that may take on any given mass. The operator which is the upside down V, [^], is an angular momentum, which is happening at each point of the shape forming an object. It is a circle circling, and this given momentum is actually able to project outwards an infinite set of object, each being a particular object in the universe. In other words, an infinite amount of points can be extracted from the circumference of a circle. A black hole functions exactly like this in the universe. But the fate in which this infinite regenerating system of particulars is determined by the observer quality. The observer quality is the side of the infinite which is a limit for it. The observer is able to stand outside independently from the process of circling, and goes right down to the centre of the circle, this called the radius of a circle, it is a point leaving the circle going to the centre, with the line tracing it, and than falling into itself.
From this the observer can determine the scope of infinite generating system, it is of capable of guiding that process to construct a reality. . (Add fractals here) (Add Aristotle point circle line) in the fish eye lense consciousness, which is found in primal life forms like fish (Compared here insect vision) One of the most primitive and basic forms of a conception is the fish eye consciousness.
This conception is the pure side of consciousness that has NOT yet integrated its perception of the object as having a continuity with other objects, therefore the conception of things appear as discrete measures of perceiving a distinct event in relation to no other events, but meditated within this gab in space and time is a peripheral side vision that captures the extent of the focus point as leading into its limit, which is what it is not, and in this convulsion is the potentiality for that specific object to be any other object, there is just enough space in that object to potentially change into any other object. This we discover is the schwarzschild radius, which instead of being a concentrated point of mass, that is only its particle like state, it is a spectrum distribution disclosing the form of the object.
The form of the object is a controlled spectrum, or rather take the bare form of a wavelength, which is a line in four dimensions, and turn that against itself, each variable making up one of the four points, to the square power of itself, in that wave spectrum, turns onto each other, in the amount making up the number of all points, each time over to each single point, simultaneously.
For a sphere to be squared,
This produces the first state which disclosing around the sphere is the point at the end of each line which a point to the centre of that line. The points at the centre of each line falls on each side of the circumference of the circle.
At this level a parallel set of lines correspond to a potential square, the function of the circle which is the shape that can fit into any other shape, is now transmitted into the square with that function, it now disclosed a coordinate system to the infinite potential determination of the point of conception moving at any given point on the circumference of the circle.
The grid is not something already reconstructed and we emplace onto it a figure, but rather the grid conforms to the points forming the figure, it is the points of conception that point out the different aspects constituting the same figure, for example if I see a hunch or a curve on a figure that forms the points on the grid that discloses it.
Each point on the potential square now takes on a point on each line of the cubes forming the grid. Each point is on a potential spot on the squares on the grids, making each cube which is otherwise homogeneous into unique placements of each other, or rather possible placements. These placement where the cubes can possibly be positioned in relation to each other, is itself able to change degrees of angle as it is in the first place the one possible point in the parameter of the line.
Impeded in the angel of each form where one object begins and another ends is where the moment of change happens. We do not notice this implicate generating of reality.
This is why it corresponds as the radius defining the event horizon of a Schwarzschild black hole.
The state of uncertainty is not a distinct place outside the object, like an object in a void. Instead the uncertainty state is a parameter of the object such that the very form of the object that makes it something particular is itself the state of uncertainty. The uncertainty principle is the material used to form and warp the particularity of the object, and from that dimension all the events and other objects that interact with the specific object enter upon its reference frame to constitutes its particular experience. We say that things come out of vision or they enter my vision, but a more implied question is from where do these object come into the being of a particular conception. The objects disclosed within the conception from a particular view point of an object among them, constitutes the relation of that object.
(Add to quantum state)
A “small planet” conception is the inverse from the nature of discrete conception, or “fisheye conception” in the state of uncertainty.
The small planet conception is similar to the fish eye conception in that the object from which the point of view is derived to discloses a set of other potential objects, is itself structured by a combinations of those object in its conception. The small planet conception differs from the fish eye by the fact that the convulsion among object is not made discrete by a void state. The objects within the environment of one object are used to form a continuity around a single centre point object. In the fish eye conception the centre is not any object within the conception but is rather the conception itself, and whatever it misses, other objects, are excluded out as part of the relation, they are only potential parts, while the ignorance of them, is an actually real part.
the centre itself is taken around the objects.
Consciousness is the void which is the sphere encompassing the object.
Black hole seeing the past. (connect with the other view of universe circumference of black hole, and add problems with time)
particular experience of consciousness. This is how consciousness in the particular sense conceives the world. Conception of the whole universe, and the particular observer of some environment, involve the same universal form of consciousness. If we look at the particular conception, we see between the image and the black void, a circumference that blurs into the void. This part between the object and the void (consciousness), is the unconscious, which is the potential. The potential is in this sense is the whole world, not yet conceived, look behind you and you actually see what was potentially there, look away and it becomes only potentially there. This is the same way consciousness operates in relation to the whole.
The image above is another example of a particular conception of the universe. Even though it is much more general view than the one previous it is still a particular view of the universe because it is an external view, such that, what is not viewed is external to it, that when perception shifts to what is not viewed, the once previously viewed perception in-turn becomes the view external. When you look at something and not at another, where does the external view go? It becomes internal.
The picture below is a theoretical example of how consciousness internalized in the object. The development of the universe goes into itself and this internalization is expressed by the particular.
objective view of the subjective conception of the universe, cosmological principles
Add the development of the eye as the beginning of self-reflection, self-consciousness.
Void is circle
Change is curiosity. Reality principle is dominance and control. Dominance because whatever is outside reality becomes a part of it, and this constitutes control of the object. I
Chromosome figure
There is a long-seated scientific debate on what chromosomes are truly? What are they? The materialistic scientific position is limited in describing “Chromosomes” as “a threadlike structure of nucleic acids and protein found in the nucleus of most living cells, carrying genetic information in the form of gene.” Chromosomes are fundamentally a “thread” like structure of spacetime that is concentrated as a cell disclosing a void (or nucleus) for the process of its own self-generation and ultimate degeneration. This thread like structure of spacetime is found in the brain of a mammal with the capacity for consciousness, and ultimately self-consciousness, or in other terms, self-reflection. The reflection of the self is a deeper notion than the psychoanalytical idea of someone having awareness of themselves as an organism in an environment. Self-reflection, in the deeper sense, is the observers’ capacity to project mind into a reflection of reality. Mind is NOT just an orang in the organism that dictates determination and awareness, it is also a template for the environment constituting reality. All animal life, or life generally, is characterized by the quality of self-determination. Self-determination is the living source for changing position in space and time, or acting according to free-will, the willing of changing the sequence of possible future events into real moments.