Section 39 (first updated 1.06.2021)
#33- Law of mind
The error of derived abstraction
The law of mind operates through time differently, than physical objects operate in time. Physical object only bears a particular kind of relation in time, the proceed through time as an activity and so they only relate the past to the future. The external relations between material objects bear specific correlations in time. Whereas mind is able to relate the future also to the past, and therefore produce the opposite relation relative to the past to the future. This logical ability- for a reaction plus action response- allows the physical as an activity to be directed in taking the form of the idea. Once this happens the idea manifest as a general living reality, this is when the idea generalizes according to Perice. Once general, the idea remains intensity activity at the infinitesimal level where it is challenging itself in time and in time its challenge manifest as continuity.
Genetics is the means for transferring its information to itself, and in the transition, it is practicing and producing its information as concrete object. This process has already succeeded in producing its object, the physiological structure of the human being. That structures holds mind, the organ where knowledge achieves consciousness of itself. This produced a different means for transitioning its information which is necessary for the production of itself as the sublated object, the object following the previous in the series of its infinite ideas. It’s future means of its transferring is genetics manifest as technology. Technology is the new form that genetics takes as the means for transferring information.
Before we understand how technology is the new and more developed form that consciousness derives its information, lets us first understand how genetics formulate together into an organic whole- a living being. Life in this understanding is Being.
The body as a whole operates as an organ of consciousness. The body is operating in locomotion investigating its environment. This investigation is a correlation made between mind as the abstract logic and the environment as the concrete logic. Ironically in this sense the concrete logic is the process, the mind the result. The mind makes the concrete- and this accounts for consciousness.
Each cell harvests a chemical reaction- that chemical reaction is a kind of logical necessity that takes on peculiar functions, each function is the activity of the idea- it is the concrete bearing of the abstract idea. The cell is the smallest and functional unite of an organism- and each set of cells forms a series each of which actualize a particular function. In relation- it is the kind of operations of the cell that makes up the organism as a whole not anything else specific about the cell. Based on the kind of function, cells belonging to certain parts of the organisms portray a particular astheical structures- skin cells needs to…
When the organism is constituted as a whole- they become home to the operation of reason where ideas are intensity manifesting. This however obeys space and time as the system it set up for itself- however in space and time it operates freely- or as Peirce put its- more chancy. There is a greater sense of probability in what mind produces but that probability is but it’s thinking of its infinite potentiality and directing that potentiality into a reality. Life as a continuum in space and time has within itself its own limit- that being death. Death occurs when life has already exhausted the capacity it set for itself so as to achieve its function. It also occurs when that function is improbably carried out. The living organism is but the metabolization of the idea. Metabolism in the organism is the chemical process for its life, which takes on an inverse relation:
metabolization involves the synthesis of proteins and the destructive of complex substances and the consequent production of energy. This on its own is but a mere relation where matter manifest as an apparatus of distinguishing qualities into categories and such categories as relations of action. Implicit in each organism is an active system of production and destruction- and the constant tension between its construction and deconstruction is the activity for producing its ideas. This constant tension is the metabolism for the production of the idea into an object.
The human being is the collection of synthesized genes- which are information in logical relation complied into the formulation of an organic being- who’s function is the system where the idea metabolizes as the next. The active process of reproduction in life is not only one where certain physical traits are passed on into the offspring, reproduction rather invokes the developmental process of carrying on the development of the idea. Each generation inherent the intellectual traits derived from the consciousness of the previous generation. This is what Lamarck formulated as acquired traits.
The double helix is a description of the molecular shape of a double-stranded DNA molecule. This double helix shows the structure of a single strand DNA but it does not tell us what this kind of structure holds. The double helix is a physical form of the dialectic- which within itself involves the idea and its contradiction. Each strand is a logical notion with its inverse notion. It is the form of balance. In this balance there persists tension between positive and negation.
Genetics is the active mechanism whereby consciousness acts as the continuity of Reason. It is where Reason is bearing the infinite relation with its logic, each logical proposition is literally linked with another to form a node for further reasoning, and the sum connections between each node of logic produce a web of information. In this web each node of logic is transferring its logical proposition derived from its specific relation to its neighbouring logical proposition, and in return it is met with the reaction of its neighbouring node transferring it logical proposition derived from its specific relation.
The stage of intensity is not one defined by disorder, even Perices notion of chance is not one based on chaos. The realm where ideas are relating with intensity always bear a coherent and uniform whole in sync. The aspect of chance defines the way ideas exists in the coherent state. The coherent state portrays outwards chance as its means for maneuvering its information to another coherent state, each of coherent node of logic is linked by the infinite chain of ideas, which portray a nature of chance. Laws of thermodynamics.. Entropy..
Tohm Rene
3.5.Mind in Time
According to Aristotle, thought and matter are inverse properties of each other. In modern terms, matter is essentially understood by gravity whereas thought is essentially understood by reason. Gravity consists of the force of attraction. Matter in this way possesses this force in virtue of its tendency towards a central point(Philosophy of History, 31) . It is essentially composite consisting of parts that seek to attract each other. Matter therefore exhibits itself as self-destructive because it seeks to merge (Philosophy of History, 31)
Reason is different from matter because it is not determined in a particular direction. Reason has its center in itself and therefore has not a unity outside itself, but rather has already found it, existing in and with itself (Philosophy of History, 31). Reason is the determination that already has the principles of negation within itself and takes this inherent contradiction as its central point. Reason is already identical with itself and therefore exhibits the determination that aims to always go beyond itself. Reason reaffirms its essential nature by continually contradicting itself.
The claim that reason has within itself the means to contradict itself is not such a foreign idea in science. For example, the modern theory of quantum mechanics poses the concept of the “quantum spin” suggesting the notion of entanglement and “Nonlocality” (Mastin, The Physics of the Universe ). These concepts explain that in the universe objects that appear separate are intimately connected at the infinitesimal level. Nonlocality occurs because there is a phenomenon of Entanglement whereby particles that interact with each other become permanently correlated by being dependent on each other’s properties to such an extent that they effectively lose their individuality and behave as a single entity.
Pierce explains that the way mind operates in space and time is different than how matter operates in space and time. Pierce explains:
One of the most marked features about the law of mind is that it makes time to have a definite direction of flow from past to future. The relation of past to future is, in reference to the law of mind, different from the relation of future to past. This makes one of the great contrasts between the law of mind and the law of physical force, where there is no more distinction between the two opposite directions in time than between moving northward and moving southward (The Law of mind 546)
Matter is determined in space and time because it is ultimately their synthesis. Whereas mind is that which determines matter because space and time are but just determinations of mind. Matter therefore exhibits itself as the past because it is determined whereas mind is the future because it is determining.
When mind thinks of an idea, that idea takes on logical structure. This logical form is the final causation because it is that which fulfills the capacity of matter. In order for form to be the final causation, it requires the efficient cause for its actualization. The efficient cause for final causation is matter, which is ultimately the potential for form to be actualized. Matter is logically necessary because it is the capacity where form becomes actual.
Pierce says that matter and mind bear a level of insistency onto each other. Form bears the direction of insistency onto matter from the future to the past (The Law of Mind, 549). This means that when form is logically conceived, it insists on the capacity for its fulfillment. This Pierce calls the intensity stage where forms are intimately relating with one another and are continuously spreading (The Law of Mind, 547). The relation between forms call upon for their actualization. Once a form is actualized, it becomes generalized and its powers of affecting other forms become radically reduced, yet its intrinsic quality as a form remains the same. This stage Pierce calls generality (The Law of Mind, 549). In this stage the form is materialized and bears a direction of insistency onto to mind from the past to the future. Matter insists on mind to process forms so that the potential remains the capacity for the actual.
The present is where form and matter constitute the object, which is held by the level of intensity between forms and the generality that form assumes as matter. When forms constitute a generality, there is implicitly the level of intensity between forms. The present is the abstraction that captures the generality in relation with intensity (The Law of Mind 535). The present is always the stage is insistency where forms are general yet remain interacting with intensity.
According to Pierce, mind is not subject to “law” in the same rigid manner that matter is. In this way mind is less mechanical and fundamentally exhibits levels of uncertainty and spontaneity. This does not mean that mind is random; it instead means that it is probabilistic. The probabilistic nature of mind defines its mechanism for continuously thinking because it enables mind to go through every possible logical form (The Law of Mind, 554). Uncertainty and spontaneity are however efficient properties and should not be confused with the final causation of mind. The ultimate determination for thinking is an ethical principle. This point is a divergence from Pierce but the ethical nature of mind is one fundamental principle that Pierce overlooks. This however is beyond the scope of this discussion and constitutes a whole new separate inquiry on its own.
This is similar to how Pierce understands the term Chance. The notion of absolute chance as proposed by Pierce in no way makes the claim that the world is ultimately chaotic. For Pierce, chance is a logically necessary principle that is an operative mechanism in the world. Pierce says “the diversification, specificalness, and irregularity of things I suppose is chance”. For example, throwing a dice and getting the number six more than once defines regularity, however it is irregular in the number of times I throw the dice. For Pierce the amount of times the dice is thrown is specificalness because it must continuously be taking place in order to get numbers.
If we look at the concept of entropy for example in the laws of thermodynamic, we see that chance plays an important role when energy is transferred from one body to another. The concept of Entropy represents the degree of disorder or randomness in a system ( Uorgeon Atomic Theory ). According to thermodynamics, entropy indicates that within a macroscopic system there exist certain levels of microstates or molecular disorder. What this means is that any phenomena of randomness or disorder is the efficient movement between systems of coherency. Moreover concerning the same phenomenon of energy transfer, Pierce identifies the process of energy transfer between bodies is irreversible (CP.6.72). Material bodies giving up heat energy cannot regain it from colder bodies. This contradicts the classical laws of mechanics, which states that all changes of state are reversible. Classical laws of mechanics reduce the concept of energy to a mechanical system of regularity.
For Pierce chance is the necessary efficient cause for mind to operate, however this is not the same as saying that whatever coherency the mind creates is a product of chance. Chance is instrumental for the actual activity of reason, and it is important not to confuse the ends with the means. It is easy to say that world is chaotic and random. This is an excuse for conjuring up any explanation for any phenomenon. Viewing the world as only random and chaotic is the Understanding failing to make the final connection and achieving reason. When the Understanding separates the idea from the matter it is left with the scattering of ideas and objects that are not by first impression related. If the understanding stops here it will have a chaotic world bearing no rationality.
24#- Mind in time
Mind in time seeks to diversify its self because it already exists as unified with itself- the contradiction is the unity. One peculiar aspect of mind is that it presupposes its principles beforehand the demonstration. Mind must do this because the proof is the extension of the principle, the principle is the form and the proof is the content. The idea is the form of knowledge. Mind is the pure logic that produces that into its object. Matter on the other hand is the past of mind and already consists of diversity from the onset, so it exhibits itself as emerging with itself. Matter is the condition of the diversity into a homogeny.
Mind and matter bear an inverse reflection of each other. This means that mind makes matter so it is the nature of it. Yet matter is the object of mind and where mind resides. So that the essential nature of matter is mind, or reason. Reason seeks to merge itself with itself but in its pure form it is . Whereas mind inversely is already reason and so it’s essential nature is its object. Matter aims to diversify itself only by way through its object. So mind needs matter to make its thought concrete, and matter seeks reason to be concert.
The present is the level of insistency
Through the inquiry we have been saying that the nature of form is particular because it takes on a definite nature. Whereas matter is universal because it takes on form without itself being anything specific. Form and matter in relation exhibit each other with their nature. In relation, the particular form is infinite so that there is an infinity of particular forms. Whereas matter is finite because it is actually where the form is concrete as a particular thing. In this way matter aims to merge itself into one whole when forms takes on a particular nature in it. Form in the other aims to diversify form to be every particular kind of thing. Together we have the laws of matter as emergence or homogeny, and the law of mind as diversity. When mind diversify itself, the particular forms making the plurality because they are material, aim to come together and merge. This is how the substrate remains a universal whole. Whereas mind in order to remain particular must diversify its particular nature into every kind of specific thing.
Future events revolve around you
The fabric of spacetime is the medium of transmission of an electron, or an event within the conception of the observer.
The ideal limit is the aim determined by the conception of the observer. Ideal in this sense is purely defined by what is fundamentally being determined and not necessarily the best case scenario. It is logically presupposed that the first case scenario in order for there to be a relative value is for the variables to be laid out. The outcome of value in the relation between nothing and being is for there to be being and this is entirely dependent on the nature of the contradiction between them. The German idealism of Hegel sublated the ridged categories of nothing and being from the ancient Greeks and formulated their active forms in the complex of the negation. Nothing and being form a complex contradiction which result in two outcomes- negative and positive reason.
Nothing itself is a something and therefore it is a being, but this alone is a negative reason because what being is can only be a no-thing, it is not any thing. But this negation is precisely the advance for the positive reason which when we have being as a nothing and therefore not a single thing, we have possibility, a becoming. This pure becoming has nothing as its object. nothing is the thing that becomes and is conceived into something. It is not quit true to say that something comes out of nothing, but it is a different claim to say that nothing is something because that is self-evidently true whereas the former is a mere grammatical error, an illusion of language. When you assume that something comes out of nothing, you just assumed that nothing is a thing in which another thing comes out of. It is invalid to say something comes out of nothing, structurally incorrect because both premises are assumed to be the same kind of object. Whereas it is valid to say nothing is also being, because the distinction between nothing and being are made to differences of the same category. Nothing becomes the dimension .
(Add to physical substrate) the physical substrate is the natural self-evident proof for a hypothesis. The abstract substance in this dynamics posits a hypothesis involving two possible outcomes, and the physical substrate offers indisputable proof for the occurrence of one over the other. For example, abstractions offers the possible outcomes of either touching or not touching a tree, which when taken independently from the physical manifestation of tree in contact with a hand, both outcomes are potentially viable in an equal matter. The physical manifestation of a tree in relation to the sense organ of touch determines whether the tree is being touched or not, it is self-evident whether a tree is being touched or not. However it is less self-evident that while touching a tree, your also not touching a tree, the abstract principle still subsists behind the scenes because the abstract contains both outcomes simultaneously is an ideal limit to which each action approaches. That when I am touching the tree my other hand is not touching the tree or that the contact of my hand with a tree is a limit to both, where my hand begins and the sensory nerves to adapt that as opposed to where the tree begins and the distinction is made from my hand.
The ideal limit is what the observer aims at. When the observer approaches the object the conception aims at, the centre of the conception, as the object approaches the conception, the conception moves away from the object from the inverse side, the conception opens up a new field of objects. As you move closer and closer towards object you see new backgrounds
As one conception moves closer to the object an inverse conception moves further away from the inverse side.
(Add positive negative future past)
The subject under discussion concerns the nature of events as objects in nature.
The Doppler effect talks about the change in the frequency of waves caused by the relative motion between the source of the wave and the observer. The source of the wave is just another potential object disclosed within the conception of the observer while the observer itself as a conception is an object. The similarity between the object and the observer is derived from their difference because they are both discrete forms, particle like objects, but their difference is that they are not the same objects because they do not occupy the same space at the same time. It is this very difference that makes them part of the same wavelength, or that the observer and object are only the same thing when they are wavelengths, which is what is being disputed as having changed due to the relation between the observer and object. So we are working from the reverse to answer an inverse
For example, as the source of the wave and the observer move toward or away from each other determines the increase or decrease in the frequency of waves like sound, light, etc. Before we unpack this definition it is first important to ask, what are wavelengths other than their apparent change in frequency? Answers to this questions reveal that the wavelength property of a thing provides an understanding about what it means for the object and observer to be internally within each other instead of what ordinary experience presents as an observer occupying the place of one object outside another object in an environment that is also external to them and separating them.
Empirical science categorizes elements like light, sound etc., as waves because they exhibit a certain duration of time and an extension in space. The categorization of natural elements into wavelengths however requires constant reminder that these phenomenas are events because they are experiences to an observer. the measure of durations in terms of length attributes to a particular happening an extension in space, and longevity of time but duration of a wavelength is the measure of “a thing that happens” can be encompassed by the term “event”, an instant it time, which is the discrete measure of an activity. (Abstraction as the way an event is discerned) As we keep in mind the fact about wavelengths characterizing the duration of events, we ask how an event originates? Quantum answers to the question of origination always begin with the relation to an observer, in the same way the wavelength in this context always derive from particle, every phenomenon originates from an observer. Concepts like the Doppler effect and Schrödinger cat always presuppose the observer as the factor for determining when a quantum system stop existing as a superposition of states and become one or the other.
The philosophical difficulty here is that the observer is not the cause of the event, in the sense that events originated out of whim from the observer, or more generally things randomly occurring in nature, because so far as the observer is a fact a part of the event means they are just another logical factor in a relation. The observer derives the quality of generating events into being because it is the quality in the relation that determines the course of a duration. The observer for example is the component of a Superposition within a quantum system which is defined when any two or more states, like particle or wave, can be added together (“superposed”) and the result will be another valid quantum state; and conversely, that every quantum state can be represented as a sum of two or more other distinct states. This is just another empirical fact that catches up with the logical function of the synthesis in the dialectic. To explain how the dynamics of the superposition is characterized by the observer, let us take the concept of the Doppler effect to depend on few presuppositions when we consider wavelengths to describe events. first, the observer and phenomena form an indivisible relation like the way a particle determines the frequencies of the wavelengths. Second, the observer and phenomena have a relative relation, they are asymmetrical, and this determines the extent of a wavelength frequency. frequency in this context is the rate of the event occurring in time and the distance it covers in space . Third, the asymmetrical relation between the observer and the phenomena depends on the dimensional spectrum we know as macroscopic and microscopic scale. Asymmetry in this context is the fundamental difference in substance between mind and matter outlined by the law of mind (pierce), that objects are here and now while ideas are there and later. We will explore these three points as factors describing the direction of cosmological motion in terms of the generation of events relative to the experience of observer.
The change in the frequency of wave depends on a point like particle omitting wave lengths, which in this context is a potential object, it could be a star emitting light, a duck in the water making ripples etc. Inversely in the same way the wavelength is the potential events of the particle, the waves could be the ripples in the water, the light waves from the star etc. The particle is in fact a mere concentrate of its wave length. The duration itself took on a particular determination within itself, and from that particular determination is the point governing the duration.
The motion in terms of generating events is not merely locomotion but the alteration of qualities. The frequency of light for example is the change in colour, the alteration from violet to red to yellow etc. The radiation of light is alteration of colour. This phenomenon is known as the “redshift”, stars change colour depends on their relative motion to the observer. Astronomers use this to determine whether stars are moving away or towards earth, and it turns out that almost everything perceived in the universe is moving away from earth very quickly. Empirical scientist quickly took this fact to make the conclusion that the universe is expanding. But the reality is that the universe is not necessarily expanding but moreover the events disclosed by the conception of observer are progressing and unfolding in the same way the colours from light alter as they move relative to the observer.
As time moves forward, the potential object condense and form the present, while what already happened separates away and become more and more abstract
in the direction the particle is moving towards the wavelengths “bunch up” coming closer and become condensed; and the direction away from the movement, away from the centre, the centre does not have to be static, a movement can be the centre, the wavefronts spread out from each other. This describes the microscopic and macroscopic magnitudes, the direction the object is moving towards, the motion towards the centre, we see the potential events condense together to form the present condition of the real present moment. The movement away is not event left “behind” the movement going towards the future, but as the particle transitions forming closer and closer wavelengths in the direction of its motion, there is a simultaneous editing of the wavelengths left behind. Wave lengths are never linear but their linear duration is an abstraction of their curvature, they always are circular, they emanate, and therefore the outreaches fronts further away from each other are connected to the wavefronts connected closely to each other, their linear relation is the distance between the potential event and the actual one.
towards and its potential events are concentrating to become its present moments, the movement away is the prospect, what is beyond the present, the past and future as the duration away from the movement towards, is maintained as the potential events that the particle is moving towards. The microscopic dimension is not a place but a form of motion whereby the potential events, wavelengths, coming from the single particle, are coming together to form the present. Whereas the macroscopic scale is not the area away from the movement left behind as the particle moves forward, but is the end extent, the prospect of what is initially the potential events the object is moving towards.
If the object exhibiting waves is moving towards the observer, the bunched up waves are observed at a high frequency, the pitch of sound becomes louder for example as it comes closer and closer to the ear, and as the wavefront come closer and closer to each other condensing. While the object is moving away from the observer the wave is observed at a lower frequency, for example the pitch of sound fades by becoming weaker as it gets further and further away from the ear and as the wavefront get further and further away from each other.
This apparent change in the frequency of the wave coming from an object only changes relative to an observer occupying a position in another object because from the first point of view of the object, there is no change in its frequency, as the car comes close to you the pitch of its horn increases and diminishes as it gets further away, from the driver, there was absolutely no change in the frequency of the sound, the pitch of the horn remains at the same frequency the whole time. This is because when the observer is the source of the particle emitting wavelengths, this is identical with what it means to be at the present moment, the present appears as the only moment always. But if the observer is not the source of the particle wavelength and is relative to it, there is an apparent change in the transition of its duration, this is why we witness other people ageing but not ourself. We see a flower blossom then decay away, we see the sun rise then set. From a relative relation to another object, it’s wavelength is witnessed as the duration of its life process. From the first point of view, the observer as the source of the wavelength, the duration is observed as the present moment changing into other potential present moments, the process we coin future away from the past.
The idea in this context is assumed to be the actual force for generating an event into reality. The idea is conception of reality whether that means infinity is always eternally present and the observer determines that in a particular way, recognizes what is there and acts on it, or the observer is the one actually generating these infinite possibilities and pushing them into being. Whether latter is true is actually the same as the former because it just means the observer is the singularity where the infinite exists as possibilities. Potentialities do not exists in the same way as realties because a reality exists when it was once before not existing, while a potentiality always exists by never existing at a particular time, I.e, not present.
Past and future as energy states of time
The observer is the particular force in the universal that is the variable for completing a realization of something. When an observer conceives an idea into a real event, the observer is situated at the present and they think of something, say a house. The house they think of is not every house because every house is slightly different, so they ascribe to the thought of the house certain details, like the house is coloured white and yellow with a roof slightly sloped to the edge etc., This quick image of a particular house instantaneously is conceived with the thought of a house, this specification is actually somewhere a real house, whether the person has seen it in their early childhood or months before, or never at all remains vague, yet it is nevertheless a fact that they conceived a house with these specific details, which it is possible to say there is a real house like that somewhere. This conception of a house during the present is the thought of a potentiality, or rather a future event, which acts as a trajectory for the direction of time to move towards realizing. However this is only one thought among an innumerable amount of thoughts each of which has been conceived at one point in time and may already be occupying the present moment and are being overlooked as the mind is occupying with the conception of other thoughts, for we can say that the mind lives in the future and the past more than in the present. The present is always filled with the events being passed by that have been previously conceived but not obvious that they have been during the moment they are happening.
Going out of past into future
The observer acts as a consciousness field for time, which behaves like an electrical field.
The positive charge omits out and the negative charge attracts. the observer is omitting out the future and attracting the past; and the past is omitting out the present, and the future is attracting the present. There are two simultaneous avenues where the future and the past are both the positive and negative determinations that constitutes the continuous duration for the present point.
The reason why time is characterized as a “point”, as we say ‘points in time’, is because time is measured by different conceptions of events, like in the case of memory, certain events are recalled, for example ‘I went to the park’, ‘I had a fight’, ‘I ate a sandwich’. Time is measured by the character of these events, and then it is measured by the order of these events, e.g, ‘I had a fight’ may have came before ‘going to the park’ yet I remembered the latter first before the former, than I had to rearrange the orientation. In more obscure cases, I may remember a dream of an event before that event would happen later on, the sequence goes something like, I had a dream, then in a later time I remembered that dream, and then after memory the event in the dream actually happened in waking life, and so my memory was of an event before it happened, or perhaps this entire construction of sequences is from a failed memory piecing together a series in a wrong order.
The point is that we experience time going in a single direction, which means there is a necessary order of events, this just means that events must came in an order but the question is why and in which way do they come in the necessary order that they do? The answer to this question is based on the difference between future and past is not only that one comes after the other, but the difference between past and future is the inverse way events are ordered in relation to the present. From the past they are ordered in a certain way, but before coming to the ordered there was a present with a future where the order of events was in a potentially different way.
The past provides the necessity for there to be a certain kind of order, for example, it is a fact that the treaty of Versailles cane after world war 1 and than after that followed world war 2. In this way the past is the point in time where events are attracted to forming a sequence with a specific order. The future however is the point in time where events come out of as possibilities. In the present there is an observer and this observer is faced with a set of possibilities that might occur, they are different direction which the flow of time may enter into, and out of the present events are repulsed out as future possibilities. In this way it is a positive determination with several arrows coming out of as possibilities.
Once the present ascends into these possibilities, it does so one at a time, it becomes the events attracted to the past forming an order based on their occurrence of coming right after another. The arrows go into the negation, but as you notice, the future events happen, and only once they happen they become the past, in essence the past is the future from the position of the future at the present. And the past is the future from the position of the present in the sense that the present is expelled out of the past.
The future is the point where the duration of time is attracted to, and the past is the duration of time which is being expelled out. The present is where the observer is in the middle of these, so that you think of something before it happened, and than you think about something after it has happened, both these times the thought is about the same thing but from different sides in time, before it happened, there is uncertainty as to whether it is or it is not, after it happened, there is certainty that it did happen, and now it is no longer happening, that at one point it is, at another it is not. The present delineates these two pairs of transactions. Before it happened the event is in an uncertain state, it’s happening is the same as it’s not happening,
The observer is a synthesis of negative and positive determinations in the sense of being a complication of past and future. When the past is the positive determination, the present comes out from it, we say time continues on from the past. The future when negative determination is coming towards the present, or that the present is moving towards the future. Inversely the past is negative when the past moves away from the present and the future positive when the potential event is coming towards the present.
Every organic system of generation involves this circuitry form of receiving and giving
Once an idea is thought of during the present, the duration of time moves towards that, like in the form of an orbit, one planet bypassing another, at one point it intersects that potential idea and it becomes the real present moment, and than as time moves on that present moment which was once the future is now passed and becomes the past.
The event intersects consciousness at the present in a Doppler effect way, it is approaching coming closer and than goes further away. The future event comes towards the observer and than passes away
From the present, once an idea has not happened, it is the potential future, and as time moves towards that and passes it, after it has happened, the event is now the past, means it has happened but still does not now exists, it returns back into a potential state. The potential state still exists and in that sense is real but did not happen. The potential has the past and future as both sides of its nature, the future it has not happened yet but is conceived or considered as a possibility, but in order to even have this reality, the past the event has already happened and been passed and therefore in that sense it does not exists but it exists in having at one point exists. The past is the force for the potential event to have reality in order to be considered as a future event. The past and future form the same duration and this duration is circular, the present is the point in that that connects the two together.
The circles at the end of each cone connect together to be the same circle, every circle is one circle. The outer circle in the below illustration signifies the conception as it moves in time, it discloses the individual and the event and the moment they both share.
The observer is a point moving in the fabric of spacetime, and spacetime is made up of all possible events, and the observer is passing those, approaching some and they are the future, and having gone through them, and these are the past.
In other words the past and future are two
Every event happens once
indeterminacy of potential events have their moment in an actual occurrence wherein each of those possible events are real instances. Real in this sense takes the form of an external relation, an entity independent
The reason why time has one dimension is because of an instance- that everything happens once. This is also mathematical 1,10, 100, 1000, 10000, 100000, 1000000 etc.
Every occurrence is a different one even if it’s repetition of the same activity. 1000 happens once. An event bring enteral is not the same quality of it only happening once. Something can only happen once eternally.
The quantization of 1 is not primarily characteristic of a single object because an entity is a complex relation between a conception and its object, which is always through another object, an entity is therefore a relation, horse comes out of horse, bird out of bird etc., before there is single bird or single horse. The quantitive measure of 1 relates to that of a conception disclosing a set of relations. To count anything as one, one chair, one house, one wife etc. Are all the association of attributing a conception to an experience:
(Add to electron events)
It turns out that the universe operates exactly like the individual process of self-consciousness entity except in a larger and infinite scale. Every possibility has already in the predicate been actualized as a potentiality, this forms the basis and the environment of nature. Following the actualization of every possibility, a particle like energy, a concentration, emerged as a free self determinate energy, whose activity is to conceive each possibility individually. This process took on infinity of each individual self determined free body corresponding to the infinity of the predetermined actualized potentiality. And so each possibility comes with it an aspect of its self confirming conception.
The complexity takes fold when the free body corresponding with the phenomena takes on the self determination to breakthrough to another phenomenon. Here we have the process of development occurring as the internal energy experiencing through each potential phenomena and the breaking through to the next while maintains a self single determantion. Development is a free self determined body maintaining self identity while going through the experience of each potential event confirming their reality.
(Add event particle)
Action that is simultaneously an object
It is a very specific kind of conception where an action does not simultaneously produce with it the spatial and physical affects identical with the form of the act. We are used to perceiving objects engaging in actions that do not simultaneously produce with them the physical result identical with the form of the action. We perceive actions that produce physical consequences other than their form. For example, the impact of a meteorite causes a crater. This cause and effect is an external relation between two physical objects that produce physical consequences in the other object outside the internal structuring of each object involved in the collision. Our concern here concerns how an action can constitutes the internal structuring of an object that produces it as an external object independent from the actions that brought rise to it.
Matter is the stability maintaining an indivisibility and it is the substance of possibility because it is receptive to change while maintaining the durability to endure the duration of the change. Form is the abstract content of the substrate filling it up with qualities and causing it motion, motion in this sense is changing and unfolding of different experiences.
Quantum entanglement is an interaction between particles but particles are not objects in the conventional sense because they have mass but no physical size, this means that particles are the quantity of an event, the form disclosing the happening of an event. Entanglement concerns the interaction between the dimensions of events. How this works can be illustrated by how magnetic fields operate.
Magnetic fields
The law of mind is not so detached from ordinary experience because consciousness in the form of the understanding always stands in retrospective to its experience. Self reflection stands one step ahead in time to the experience as its ideal limit so that the duration of an event is leading towards its conception. One step ahead in time is one step behind in space. As the duration is extending towards its conception, the conception exists embedded within the extension of the experience.
The law of mind is not so detached from ordinary experience because consciousness in the form of the understanding always stands in retrospective to its experience. Self reflection stands one step ahead in time to the experience as its ideal limit so that the duration of an event is leading towards its conception. One step ahead in time is one step behind in space. As the duration is extending towards its conception, the conception exists embedded within the extension of the experience.
The instantaneous point is the environment wherein two events interact with each other. A being in the future event has for itself the capacity to determine a set of already occurred events in the past, while the being from the past has these very same events as possibilities of outcomes. They both exists as objects of conception but differently arrived at from an inverse
Whitehead extends the mind-body unity to be predicte of the general mind- matter unity. The dynamics of this mind-matter unity is informed by pierces law of mind. The way mind forms the basis of matter concerns a kind of basic communication between them. By communication we are exhausting this notion to include the way two things of different substances unfold into the same conception.
Communication is a passage of nature wherein an exchange is made between two inverse variables to direct the flow of duration in the same direction. In the case of the understanding, language keeps people talking about the same thing. Events are the language of mind and they are the way mind communicates with matter to form the experiences of the observer. We limit communication to language by sound or word, but spatially speaking communication takes the form of objects, whereas in the realm of time events are the forms of communication.
mind communicates with matter is by way of events. Events are the way mind communicates with the body.
The mind has a hypothesis and the body either proves or disapproves that.
Logic of possibility
Add pierces hypothesis
Pierce’s law states that the fact of a false proposition is itself a truth. It is true that something is false.
((P→Q)→P)→P. Written out, this means that P must be true if there is a proposition Q such that the truth of Pfollows from the truth of “if P then Q“. In particular, when Q is taken to be a false formula, the law says that if Pmust be true whenever it implies falsity, then P is true. In this way Peirce’s law implies the law of excluded middle.
The error of derived abstraction
The human understanding has an anticipatory property not only in reaction to uncertainties from the environment but also reacts to the compulsion of thought itself. For example, instinct, reaction to external relations, but there is also more fundamental abstract principle, will, is reaction to internal relations, who you are before you are born was a will of a particular force or idea in nature.
Scientific knowledge deals with accuracy by only basing the value of a fact on what is known or can be known, but cannot take an inherent indeterminacy as the property of a fact. we know that a potential event is real by being a possibility, but science cannot make that a fact because so far as it is potential, it provides opposite information about the same piece and a basis for one over the other can only be known after the course of a duration outlining them in a particular order in time. For example, a potential event in the future can be anticipated but only after it has passed in time. science can make a set of claims about it because so long as it is still a future event, even if all possibilities about it can be elucidated as in the case of a logical analysis, it’s reality being a particular order of determination after another cannot be known unless it has passed through a duration of time. For example we can only scientifically make facts about human civilization spanning about what is known to be around 6000 years, even if we know it is a fact that humans have the future potential to exists for million of years in the future just like our distant ancestors have been around for 6 million years, we cannot make any scientific claims about such possibilities and call them facts because there simply is no basis for them other than they are anticipated as possibilities. This does not mean that they are not true or they do not happen, but the fact is that potential events do necessarily happen but not in a necessarily particular kinda way that is anticipated, and even if they happen in the way they are anticipated, only after they happen a set of factual claims can be made. Science deals with the facts of potential events with the process of hypothesis and proof, where an experiment is made manipulating an aspect of nature in order to derive predications about possible outcomes that follow from that course of action. The manipulation of nature is simply the redoing of a natural event, and the proof is to anticipate a particular outcome.
The principles of universal and particular are not different objects because there is no object that is a universal nor is there an object that is merely particular. In the latter sense every particular object belongs to a universal class of objects and in the former every object no matter it’s presence in the universe is always something particular that is distinguishable from something else. The universal and the particular therefore always exhibit itself as a relation. For example, we see the sun as a localized piece of mass and therefore it is particular but at the same time we see that it’s light is distributed covering the environment it is standing above, we see that it’s spatial extension is both particular and general.
The fundamental relation of universal and particular is especially applicable in the most generalist of sense as describing the proper relation between mind and body. Body is the localization whereas mind is the generalization and this is why for instance locomotion can only be ascribed to bodies and not abstract notions.
The interaction between future and past is the relation between mind and body. Mind already knows the events for the body, and the body goes through these events. The mind determines the future event that will happen to the body and the body confirms that event by going through it. Their interaction unfolds in this way to form the present during which there is a simultaneous inverse relation occurring in opposite manner of two factors against each other. For the mind the event occurs as an instantaneous point flash, a packet of information physically known as quanta and mentally known as an idea . The total duration of an event is quantized for mind as instant packet of information, mind does not have to go through a duration of event to know it, it derives all it needs to know about the event by the instant conception of it. This instant conception of an event is when an idea happens, it takes an instant to already derive all that is needed to know about what happened and therefore there is no particular order forming the duration of the experience.
Whereas for the body the instant conception of an idea constitutes the nature of the plain whereby the body operates a duration. In the instances of terrestrial bodies we have the environment as
The environment is not merely the geographical area but is primarily a setting in which a particular activity is carried on, this includes abstract activities as well, but much less obviously so, because the fallacy that the abstract is somehow distinct from the concrete is so deeply impeded in the human understanding that it is difficult to ascertain how the abstraction of an idea is somehow internally projected onto its physical substrative side. Yet this problem is only prevalent when we reflect about it because unconscious experience always involves a physical contact as a medium by way a form is transmitted through that, by way of intuition we derive a sense or by way of perception we derive an image.
Why a thought is not instantaneously an object
How potential is conceived as object in time
It seems that the further a potential state is in the future away from the present of the particular, the more it is determinable. But this time span is proportional to the span of the object. That an object so far is particular has a specified life span to which it changes into another object. The closer the conception is to the object, the less compulsion is there for one to cause the other. For example if I think of wanting a dog at this moment it is unlikely that a dog magically appears by virtue of my thought of it, but in a 6 months span assuming that my thought of wanting a dog is genuine it is very likely that a dog appears into my life. The reason why a thought does not necessarily instantaneously conceives an object is due to the Pragmatic principle of time: that it takes time to do something. On the other hand if something already exists and is eternal it does not take any time. But so far as any particular determination is concerned, the more time between the beginning of the advance and the end of the advance, the stronger the power is for a thought to conceive the object. Besides time, the properties of spatial extension must all be elucidated, where, what how etc. All relate to the kind of material, its structures like length, size, mass etc. We see proof of this in our observation of macroscopic universe with telescope. The spatial extension of perceiving through a telescope to an object in space like a star is not based on distance because the telescope to a degree eliminates certain amount of distance between the observer and object. The telescope to allow for perception of object is based on its apparent size because telescopes can allow for perception of objects millions miles away so long as the object is large enough to have an apparent diameter. On the other hand concerning temporal extension in time, an image of an object millions miles away is never a “real time” image, that is the object perceived at a far distance does not share the same moment as the observer perceiving it because the light has to travel from the object to the observer. Some modern scientist even make the startling fact that an object in space like galaxy or star may have already passed its lifetime and in its present state no longer exist but the light from it is still traveling across space towards the present of the observer. For the observer the object which in itself is no longer there still exists because it is in a wave function state extended in space but no longer in a particle state as an individual expression.
(Add to spatial temporal extension, future past)
Add Hegel ratio
“In its determinacy of being on its own account quantum is external to itself. This self-externality constitutes its quality; it is in this very self-externality that it is itself and is related to itself. In this way, the externality, i.e., the quantitative, and the being-for-itself, the qualitative, are united.-Posited upon itself in this way, quantum is quantitative relationship [or ratio], [i.e., the] determinacy that is both an immediate quantum (the exponent), and mediation (namely the relation of any quantum to another )-the two terms of the ratio, which do not count according to their immediate value, since their value is only [determined] in this relation.”
The quality of self externality is the wave extension property in which each particle state operates in a definite and particular manner within.
“The quantitative infinite progress appears at rst as a perpetual projec tion of numbers beyond themselves. However, when we look more closely, it turns out that in this progression quantity returns to itself, for the thought that is con tained in it is in any event the determination of number by number, and this gives us quantitative ratio. If we speak of the ratio 2:4, for example, then we have two magnitudes whose significance does not lie in their immediate character as such, but only in their reciprocal relation to one another. But this relation (the exponent of the ratio) is itself a magnitude, which is distinguished from the magnitudes that stand in relation to one another by virtue of the fact that altering them changes the ratio, whereas the ratio remains indi erent to the alteration of its two sides and stays the same, just as long as the exponent is not altered. So we can substitute 3:6 for 2:4, without altering the ratio, because the exponent, 2, remains the same in both cases.”
This is how from the indeterminacy of vibration uncertainty derive a particular definite form. Determining any place on the indeterminate spectrum of vibrations forms it into a particular state.
The universe at large is osculating in this way but from the inside out to derive small concentration of matter. This is why string theory is closely related to explain quantum gravity.
(Related to inflation) the universe growing from small to big are the osculations of gravity forming mass.
In the idea of inflation there is discrepancies in the condensation of matter when the universe began to cool down after expansion and energy turned into matter. Matter is not distributed equally but there are clusters of matters. It is often argued that the more mass there is in one place the more gravity is bended and distorted. But in quantum mechanics specifically string theory, it must be accounted for how properties implicit in spacetime contribute to the formulation of matters condensation because the latter presupposes the former and it is not enough to say that spacetime causes clumps of mass condensed into certain area because that does not explain the ratio between two amounts are contained within the other to form a certain structure. How does spacetime cause the unique form of a mass? The common image used to explain the affect of mass on gravity is that gravity is distorted by the mass, . what is flawed here is that the induction of mass effecting gravity is inversely a deduction from the fact that gravity is first mass, in other words the distortions of mass on gravity is taken to mean that gravity is neutral and indifferent to the effect of mass on it. Gravity is taken as the general law, the rule applied to all objects with mass, the force of attraction that exists between any two masses, any two bodies, any two particles etc. But so far as being this general relation among things, as to what it is in itself is not explained and almost left as this general feeling of “heaviness” the weight possessed by things keeping everything intact.
Modern Astro physicists ponder the equation that the more mass equals bigger curve in space time without first asking whether these distortions of gravity with certain forms are abstract-able, insofar as suggesting that they are separable, from the mass itself that is said to have caused them? Physicist say that the interaction between space, time and gravity combine to create the universe but they omit this does not explain how complex and unique structures of the universe are formed? The laws of physics explains how spacetime behaves but it does not explain the origination of this “something” which stretches and contracts to be the unique and particular kind of the structures that diversify nature.
The problem is that physicists still looking for cause and effect concerning form and matter because , they often argue that spacetime is the cause of the complexity of the universe without recognizing that the only cause spacetime has is being a fundamental principles of being, in other words, it is a principle of which it is uncaused, it is a self evident rule.
(Add string theory infinitesimal strings)
Doppler Effect (explain)
http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~gibson/Notes/Section6_3/Sec6_3.htm
The Doppler effect (or the Doppler shift) is the change in frequency or wavelength of a wave for an observer who is moving relative to the wave source
The observer determines the magnitude of the wave frequency. The siren is coming towards you, when the pitch is higher. After passing you, the siren is going away from you and the pitch is lower. If you are moving relative to it, as you come closer the pitch gets higher, as farther the pitch becomes lower. The point is that whether the observer is in motion or the object, the frequency of the wave is measured by the experience of the observer.
The effect never leaves the cause, but conforms to it wherever the motion of the cause goes.
Change of wavelength caused by motion of the source.
The wave frequency is determined by the relation to the observer.
This is actually the way mind produces matter.
It works with all types of waves, which includes light. Edwin Hubble used the Doppler effect to determine that the universe is expanding. Hubble found that the light from distant galaxies was shifted toward lower frequencies, to the red end of the spectrum. This is known as a red Doppler shift, or a red-shift. If the galaxies were moving towards hubble, the light would have been blue-shifted.
The farther you go away from something, the dimmer its light gets because the wider the frequency of the wave becomes. The implications of this effect is much greater than initially described because if we take light as the elementary structure of matter, technically the dimmer the light of the star in relation to the observer means the higher rate of its decay. The stars that appear to be going farther are in fact objects of the past that are decaying relative to the present observation of it. They are not moving farther away in distance, space, but rather in time, which according to relativity determines the space. If time in this sense determines the space, then the present point in the universe, the observer, governs the lifespan of the phenomena.
The observer here is not a mere finite point, but must be understood in terms of the singularity, that is, there must be the singularity encompassed in the observer that is the present point containing all the mass of the universe. This singularity is not in any particular place in space, but its position in space is determined by its moment in time, its present moment.
The universe is filling itself from the outside in. the mass of the singularity Is filling in the density (?) the movement of the universe is governed by the movement of thought, the earliest ideas, are farthest away from the center- they serve as its past, and the center is literally the most current moment of thought.
The expansion is happening with an evolving movement towards the center. It is become whole from outside in. but what is the center, the center is according to the cosmological principle, the consciousness, the observer. The universe is expanding into the observer, not away from. Self-consciousness is the center. How is the fact that the black hole being nothing consistent with consciousness as the center? This is because the center constitutes the potential of the idea of consciousness, the present idea. The present idea constitutes the center of the universe.