section 24 (last updated 1.13.2021)
Newton vs Einstein
Common misconception of time
Time is not as if some already conceived measure preexists the activity and the activity takes from time quantitive amount but the doing of the activity is the duration of the time taken. Thinking prior to doing. Just like space is the place where objects can be before they arrive there. There is however no case where space exists without an object at least occupying somewhere, but once an object is somewhere in space, there is an automatic space where it is not. Time is the chance where things can happen, thought may think. Common phraseology like “running out of time” does not mean that there is some decreasing quantity but this one way of measurement in reality expresses the passing of time as the interjection of one determination by another. Time is the bare motion of determination. When activity is running out of time it means one determination is being overtaken by another determination. For example the reason why my time runs out while crossing the street is because cars are coming. Street laws are mandated to give the determination of walking its turn over the car and vice versa.
The running out of time is the set duration mandated for crossing the street because the will of the car otherwise take out the pedestrian. In similar terms the phrase referring to the “wasting of time”, that there is feeling of timing being wasted like the exhaustion of resource. This intuition of time however concerns more the reciprocity of relations than any raw denigration. For example, customer set out with the intention of making a business transaction will feel cheated if the selling party fails to show up. The affair was a “waste of time” not because of the trip happening, because the occurrence of the trip is different than the lack of happening d the business transaction, but really there was feeling of waste because the buyers determination was not met with the sellers determination.
(Add to the section infinite regress is not problem it is the state of becoming)
Time as general schema
“We have to remember that a new theory must take account of the old well-attested facts of science just as much as of the very latest experimental results which have led to its production.” (Summery 165)
Time and space as restrictions and constructions of the infinite
space looks vast and empty because the distance between the two objects the space is relative to is vast relative to the observer. However as we move out into space, the space between objects that appeared to be vast and empty begins to shrink and objects appear to come closer together, eventually objects that where at one point far apart when the observer was close to them, appear to be close together when the observer moves far apart.
From a perspective where the observer is far from the objects, they appear to come closer forming a condensation, this is why galaxies are, they are clusters of bodies seen from a far distance, but come closer to them, and the space between each individual component is vast and wide. The point is that space is an element belonging to the specific dimensions of a particular kind of object, and that the idea of space as a general schema of nature where things are just present fall within, is an abstraction
Time and space is not empty
In order for space to be poised as self-externality and therefore exist as the indifferent quantity, that itself being the initial positive determination, such self-externality presupposes the negation of itself- this is, Negativity. Negativity for itself exists as a positive existence but in relation to space it exists as negation, but because space is indifferent and this constitutes it’s positive existence, time exists for itself as pure negativity in space, that negativity is itself it’s positive existence, meaning that it actively takes something away, it is the activity of reductionism. While space being the indifferent quantity and therefore that is it’s positive feature, just simply means it lets all be contained within it, the abstraction that space is empty and hollow is just simply the abstraction of distance.
distance
The quantity of distance is the measure between two objects distinct from each other by a non distinct quantity. something that is neither both objects or any other object for that matter, just simply the indifferent area where two things can be distinguished from each other, while not worrying about having them be made distinct from the area they roam within, that is in-turn distinct from them by being something that is not distinct at all. How can distance be this non-distinct quantity by it being part of the very distinct relation of two objects? Distance is enforced by the relative interaction of the object, it is as if it is brought out of it, a thing distinct throws out the quality opposite to itself, which is not distinct at all, to qualify its distinctness.
Distance we call “interval, remoteness, separation, extent, length, width, depth, breadth, range, reach etc., all of these are kinds of measures that we ascribe relative to the nature of the object, that an object had depth for example, that is an interior distance within the object disclosed by the full circumference of the object. Breadth for instance is the span or the spread between the two most outer extreme points of the object as furthest as possible away from each other while still maintaining the diameter of the object. Space is not empty but by virtue of being the passive quantity, it is ultimately full with every possibility. Space being the quantity containing everything is not identical with everything itself, it would be obscure to reduce everything to the empty quality we know of as space. However there is no such thing as purely just empty space, and even the so called empty space we find outside the planet earth is full of complex subatomic and molecular structures of light beams, radiation, etc., time is the opposite of space as the pure negativity such that if space is positive in being the passive quantity that allows everything to be contained within it, time is the quality that limited every single of those aspects that form the complex of everything in space.
Time works against everything by giving it duration, in other words, it makes everything have a specific timespan and this is like turning everything into each and single thing, when this happens at this time the other thing does not, and every single thing is happening in a minute manner slightly after or before every other thing. time is the activity of being but as abstract activity- but because it is purely abstract, it is negative in relation to being, which is the positive, and so time is the determinacy pressing being into the becoming. If space is the abstract realm where being is becoming, time is the abstract activity where the becoming is the become. The unity of space and time, or the modern term spacetime continuum, captures the essence where the Idea takes on concrete form.
Time is the pure essence of activity, that is, abstract activity; but just like space is indifferent quantity and therefore exists as self-external quantity, time is the indifferent activity to any quality. This produces determinacy in the object to become so as to be the kind of being the object must assume so as to be itself. The object is the concrete term to the abstract term the Idea. Time is the pressing principle and therefore the motion of the object. Time is the natural occurrence to “the principle of identity” (P=P) in logic. First, it is equal with itself “as the negative unity of being outside of itself, is just as thoroughly abstract, ideal being: being which, since it is, is not, and since it is not, is” (201). Second, it is equal with the object as itself and so is an essential principle of the object itself. Time is just as continuous as space, for it is the idea of internal-relation in contrast to space as external-relation. Time is the internal -relation of the being and the activity of the object, both of which define each other by being the object. Time as the internal relation of the object is logically equivalent to P=p. P the activity pressing each variable’s being- p. But the being of p is itself a particular kind of activity pressing against time as the abstract activity. In this sense you have a “negation of negation” between time and the object. This tension characterizes what we conceive of as life and death.
In time, it is said, that everything arises and passes away. Life and death are however abstractions of arising and passing away. Such abstractions are however necessary for conceiving the object in time and deducing it to the essential object. If each abstraction of death and life is eradicated and we only abstract space in and of itself, or likewise time in and of itself, then there remains both an empty realm with an empty process. (201). This abstractions is however impossible to make because time itself is the becoming of the object, Hegel calls it “the Chronos who gives birth to everything and destroys his offspring”. In science it is established, as initially mentioned by Desecrate, matter is defined as extension; meaning that matter is spatial and temporal. First, Extension defines spatiality in the sense of the object discloses a particular area in time and fills it with content. Second, extension defines temporality in the sense that the object is divided into distinct forms part of the same extension with the shape of each part changing but maintaining the same extension that makes the object occupy a specific area in space that is different from space generally. The order of the object in space is known as moments of time. Ordinarily the extension of the object is only observed as far as to form the body of the object, while its temporal element is more of an abstract measure of it passing through a duration, say a daytime, of which we can only see it at one moment in this duration at a single time. For example you say I saw the man running at 2 o clock and then he was eating at 4 o clock , you do not see those moments happening simultaneously yet they form part of the temporal order of a thing. Hegel explains that “to be sure, this negativity is in everything as its immanent, universal essence, but the temporal is not adequate to this essence, and therefore relates to this negativity in terms of its power”.
Hegel strips time to it’s bare capacity
Time itself is eternal, for it is neither just any time, nor the moment now, but time as time is a concept. The concept, however, in its identity with itself I= 1, is in and for itself absolute negativity and freedom. Time, is not, therefore, the power of the concept, nor is the concept in time and temporal; on the contrary, the concept is the power of time, which is only this negativity as externality.-The natural is therefore subordinate to time, insofar as it is finite; that which is true, by contrast, the idea, the spirit, is eternal. Thus the concept of eternity must not be grasped as if it were suspended time, or in any case not in the sense that eternity would come after time, for this would turn eternity into the future, in other words into a moment of time. And the concept of eternity must also not be understood in the sense of a negation of time, so that it would be merely an abstraction of time. For time in its concept is, like the concept itself generally, eternal, and therefore also absolute presence.
Hegel § 202.
“The dimensions of time, the present, future, and past, are only that which is becoming and its dissolution into the differences of being as the transition into nothingness, and of Nothingness as the transition into being. The immediate disappearance of these differences into individuality is the present as now, which is itself only this disappearance of being into nothingness, and of nothingness into being.”
(1) The finite present is differentiated from the infinite in that the finite is the moment now and hence as its abstract moments, as past and future, which is different from the infinite as from the concrete unity. Eternity as concept, here contains these moments in itself and its concrete unity is therefore not the moment now, because it is motionless identity, concrete being as universal, and not that which is disappearing into nothingness, as becoming.-Furthermore in nature, where time is now, there does not occur the subsisting difference of these dimensions; they are necessarily only in subjective representation, in memory, fear, or hope. The abstract past, however, and future of time is space, as the suspended space is at first the point and time.
(2) There is no science of time in opposition to the finite science of space, geometry, because the differences of time do not have the indifference of being outside of itself which constitutes the immediate determinacy of space, and therefore they can not be expressed as spatial configurations. The principle of time only reaches this ability when the understanding has paralysed it and reduced its negativity to the unit. This motionless unit, as the sheer carnality of thought, can be used to form external combinations, and these, the numbers of arithmetic, can themselves be brought under the categories of the truth as intuition or as understanding merely for itself because the latter is only abstract, whereas the former is concrete. This dead unit, now the highest externality of thought, can be used to form external combinations, and these combinations, the figures of arithmetic, can in turn be organised by the determination of the understanding in terms of equality and inequality, identity and difference. The science which has unity as its principle is therefore constituted in opposition to geometry.
(3) The name of mathematics has moreover been used for the philosophical observation of space and time, because it lies close to this observation, despite the fact that mathematics, as noted, considers strictly the determinations of magnitude of its objects and not time itself but only the unit in its configurations and connections. To be sure, time becomes in the theory of movement an object of science, but applied mathematics is generally not an immanent science, precisely because it involves the application of pure mathematics to a given material and its determinations as derived from experience.
(4) One could still, however, conceive the thought of a philosophical mathematics, namely, as a science which would recognise those concepts which constitute what the conventional mathematical science of the understanding derives from its presupposed determinations, and according to the method of the understanding, without concepts. However, since mathematics is the science of the finite determinations of magnitude, which remain fixed in their finitude and valid, and should not change in transit, thus it is essentially a science of the understanding. And since it has the ability to express spatial figures and numbers, which gives it an advantage over other sciences of this kind, it ought to retain this ability for itself and to avoid contamination by either concepts, like time, which are heterogeneous to it, or empirical purposes. It therefore remains open for the concept to establish a more fundamental consciousness than has hitherto been shown, both in terms of the leading principles of the understanding and in terms of order and its necessity in arithmetical operations, as well as in the theses of geometry.-If one wanted to treat the forms of space and the unit philosophically, they would lose on these grounds their particular significance, a philosophy of them would become a matter of logic, or would even assume the character of another concrete philosophical science, according to the ways one imparted a more concrete significance to the concepts.-
It would, however, be a superfluous and thankless task to try to use such an unmanageable and inadequate medium as spatial figures and numbers for the expression of thoughts, and to treat them violently for this purpose. For the specific concept would always be related only externally to them. The simple elementary figures and numbers can in any case be used as symbols, which, however, are a subordinate and poor expression for thoughts. The first attempts of pure thought took recourse to such aids: the Pythagorean system of numbers is the famous example of this. But with richer concepts these means became completely unsatisfactory, since their external juxtaposition and contingent combination are not at all appropriate to the nature of the concept, and make it altogether ambiguous which of the many possible relationships in complex numbers and figures should be adhered to. Besides, the fluid character of the concept is dissipated in such an external medium, in which each determination falls into the indifferent being outside the others. This ambiguity could only be removed by an explanation. The essential expression of the thought is in that case this explanation, and this symbolising is an empty superfluity.”
Other mathematical determinations, such as infinity and its relationships, the infinitesimal, factors, powers, and so on, have their true concepts in philosophy itself. It is awkward to want to take and derive these from mathematics, where they are employed in a nonconceptual, often meaningless way; rather, they must await their justification and significance from philosophy. The truly philosophical science of mathematics as theory of magnitude would be the science of measures, but this already presupposes the real particularity of things, which is only at hand in concrete nature.
Time is pure negativity- and so it is absolute with itself- it is upholds the principles of identity- every object is transitory to time- time goes through objects- time is subjectivity because the object relates to this negativity in terms of its powers.
If space and time are taken as inverse relations of the same being, space can be identified as abstract objectivity whereas time is abstract subjectivity
Spacetime constant
The spacetime fabric Einstein uses to illustrates gravity associates a physical structure to the position the object is not immediately in. The so called “fabric” of spacetime is the potential energy a particle actually contains. potential energy is definable as all the possible forms of action, movements and scenarios a particle takes, but the particle is the actual happening of any one possibility as a real occurrence at one point in time independently of all the others. The scientific idea of gravitation took on the special task of explaining exactly how the basis of an all unifying general force impends on particular actions. Spacetime or gravity as understood by Einstein provides an overview of the effects, the reaction but never the action as the cause itself. For example, The fact that heaviness goes down towards the centre is one particular determination taken as a general rule. The law that matter falls down implies the presupposition of “downwards” as motion towards the center. The ‘center’ constitutes the observer in the cosmological principle and motion relative to that downwards is heavy, and relative to that upwards is light. We take the measure of up and down as quantities of heavy and light because they are relative to a constant, the observer; otherwise they are entirely dynamical, in space massive stars go up, down, sideways etc., Aristotle says;
“And hence in the other classes too ‘measure’ means that by which each is first known, and the measure of each is a unit-in length, in breadth, in depth, in weight, in speed. (The words ‘weight’ and ‘speed’ are common to both contraries; for each of them has two meanings-‘weight’ means both that which has any amount of gravity and that which has an excess of gravity, and ‘speed’ both that which has any amount of movement and that which has an excess of movement; for even the slow has a certain speed and the comparatively light a certain
weight.)” (meta book x part 1)
While all these measure of quantity are objective; the objective part in them is their measure, the constant of that measure is the observer, the observer is the objective part in them not the subjective, for the quantities take on a subjective manner relative to the observer, in other words, they are subject matter for the observer.
Cosmological constant
It is usually argued that Einstein’s idea of the cosmological constant erred when it aimed to achieve a so called “static universe”. Einstein abounds the idea of a cosmological constant after the empirical findings from the Hubble scope showing the universe is expanding. The mistake however was not whether there is a general constant in the universe or not but as to how a general constant should be enforced onto the world. this mistake is a result from the inability to properly explain the nature of the opposite fact by virtue of a proper explanation of the first one. The fallacy is to make the connection between two opposed facts by failing to connection of the one with itself. The nature of a constant in the universe is not the constant necessarily comes first and then the movements of change secondarily follow, because from this view we are already trapping our self in the notion where a set of determinations have no basis for being initiated if we first suppose the first motion is a rigidity . The intuition that first there must be a constant in nature as a general scope wherein objects are free bodies moving according to a set of ridged laws is an abstraction of the quality that is conceiving this state of nature. the conceiving quality is abstracted onto the world. The nature of the conception as it discloses a set of variables operating in a contrary manner provides a stable self identical reference frame in which factors are distinguishable.
the gravitational constant projects the stable reference frame of the conception onto the fabric of spacetime as if the basic substratum in which the objects exists on must also be stable in the same way as the conception disclosing them. The implicit intuition that the external matter for the conception shares in the same nature as the conceiving enclosure of it is actually a correct intuition, what is wrong is when one aspect of the conceptions nature, its static fact, is picked out over the other as the only and therefore the general basis for the nature of the constant maintaining objects: If the internal nature of the spacetime fabric is derived from the internal nature of the consciousness conceiving it, then the side of the conception that is active and providing a whole sum set of unique, undeterminable and diversely invariant determinations to each other, must also be explained as reflected in the spacetime fabric. The active nature of the conception, the excited animate part, opposite to the constant, is characterized by the nature of particle in gravity, or an object.
Constant does not mean stable, but a movement can be constant, constantly in motion. The placement of a constant onto the world, like a veil, fulfils a sense of completion, the motion does not need to be done for the result of stoping. Reason however throws the understanding back into confusion when it now must explain the results , or to what avail are the motions of nature initiate for if their beginning ground is the stability from which they deviate away from?
For example, We say the apple falls down, or the helium rises up, but we see these as only coming after the fact, ex post facto their conception. The conception that the apple falls down is its active determination, and not merely the passive witness capturing it already happening. Gravity is the extrapolation of the passive quality that maintains a reference frame to capture something as inverted outside as a general active force. In other words the quality of the conception that remains neutral in conceiving phenomena without interfering with it when inverted externally becomes a general active invariant of the passive witnessing feature of the observer.
The conception of the observer is a constant in the sense that it captures a stable sense wherein objects are distinct, but its active side, the action of the objects as having a relation to be distinct, is found inversely extrapolated as the general force of happening away from the conception. Whereas the internal aspect of the conception is the no interference witness of the happening, its external general cause is the constant of totally being involved in initiating every action. The conception stands passively away from the general capacity of action by passively witnessing it so as to not interfere with the complete extent of its capacity to fully act. The initial condition of this relation is what we know as general gravitation. The gravitational constant, called G, shoes the force between two objects is always equal to an equilibrium in motion
Even between two drastically different objects in size and mass, there is a equilibrium in motion, like the earth revolving around the sun measured by distance, speed, weight etc.
The more mass the faster because there is more space being covered by volume, more things conceived. Light is the constant of motion, takes up the highest volume, and for that reason is the limit of speed, volume is another variability of mass like density.
we say that gravity is the rule for these instances, things obey a general constant but we do not say that the general constant is a determination from the particular thing because there is the uncertainty from the particular point of view, a blind spot, that cannot maintain a comprehension of universal magnitude. For example, from one individual person point of view, the number of the human population being 7 billion is incomprehensible and is only an abstract limit concerning how many individual people there are. Mainly any individual person during the entirety of their lifetime can only perceivably come into contact with a minute fraction of the total number of human. The number of 7 billion although is meant to represent the collection of single individuals, when all these singles are taken as a group, at that level of magnitude it is very difficult to pick out any single one of them out of the collection. In other words, 7 billion characterizes the magnitude of a mass. In another instance 7 billion molecules is enough to formulate the entire mass of some life forms. So the universal constant belong independent of particular objects by forming the basis from which it is applied by them.
Gravitational energy is the specific form of general graviton that belongs as determination of particular object . Gravitational energy is the potential energy held by an object because of its high position compared to a lower position. It is the application of general gravitational into a particular avenue, a definite direction, of force. The way this works is when one object uses the particular asymmetrical structure of another object shared together by general gravitation to make a particular determination. The determination of any single object is a result out of the symmetry of the relation it bears to other objects. The angle of a diamond is a result of its prism.
Space in and out something
(Add to zooming- contact)
Newton’s absolute time- externalities
Newton’s idea of absolute time proposes that time has a definite direction and everything is heading along that direction. For example, everything moves from the past to the future. Newton’s idea of time constitutes the general and ordinary understanding of time and is based on the following assumptions; First, time moves “forward” and at an absolute fixed rate throughout all of the universe. Second, Time exists independently of any perceiver in the sense that it always progresses at a consistent pace throughout the universe and this trend is not changed or determined differently by the observer perceiving it. This standard makes makes time measurable and provides time with some objective basis because it is where two different observers occupying two different positions in space can agree on the same time. For example, two people across the street agree it is 2pm in the afternoon. Einstein’s idea of relativity questions that very simple intuition because it relates time to space as indivisible unit.
Special relativity makes a counter intuitive revelation concerning the magnitude of space and how that relates to time. The idea of special relativity takes the common observation about space that it is extensively large, an object can theoretically go out, out and out in space without end. The demonstration for this is witnessed in the phenomenon of light which has the ability to travel through space without a comprehensible end. This is the reason why ‘nothing is faster than the speed of light because light is a fundamental mass belonging to any object so that the light omitting from an object in motion would also surpass the object, it is always one step ahead. And this displacement of asymmetry between the light of the object and the object itself compound to form a sphere like orb, where the light is arriving every direction out of the object, and the object is disclosed by that conception. Ultimately this is the form of an atom, the electron being the force of energy disclosing the relation between the proton and neutron. Special relativity takes the idea that space is infinite and inverses that by claiming that space is also infinitesimal. This means that there is not only an extensive quality of going out and out, that there is an infinitely far distance between things, but there is also infinitely closer distance between object that does not take an extensively large magnitude but rather and intensely small, or “minute” distance.
When observers are external to each other and perceive each other from the “outside”, I look at an object outside of me, and the object is actually outside of me to be looked at, from this reference frame an object is perceived to be a definite thing at a definite moment in time with a certain position in space. Whatever is being observed and whatever is happening at this present moment is definite, certain and indisputable, it is directly in contact with and happening as the way it is and not otherwise. For example, if someone’s hand gets amputated, it does not matter what the person witnessing this wants to see, it does not matter if they justify it or what they say because the matter at hand is that the hand is missing and it is too late to change it, or think what would it be like if it did not happen, or whether it is really happening or not, the fact is that it is directly happening.
Newton’s idea of absolute time concerns this element of that when a moment happens it is happening and cannot be otherwise independent of any determination, but because there is always a present moment in which an event is definitely happening, this fact is extrapolated onto the whole, that the whole must be happening in a definite and specific way, the whole is disclosed within a certain moment and it is constantly flowing through in that frame as definite of a manner as it is definitely conceived. Whereas it is too late to change a moment once it has happened, Newton’s concept of time does not explain what led to the happening of this present moment, or why did it happen? These questions are dismissed impossible to answer because the idea is that moments just simply happen due to the necessity that a definite moment has to always occupy the present. And that once a moment happens, it does not matter why it did.
(Add to time is being and not-being)
(Add to contact)
Spacetime physicality
The physicality of spacetime is unlike any single thing that is physical. There are many different levels of physicality that are imperceptible, like ultraviolet lights, sound vibrations, each of these are physical in that if they are perceived through certain machines they would exhibit structures in motion like any body in space does. But the physicality of spacetime is undefined because it is uncertain or indistinguishable as a wave or a vibration or any single kind of physical form. Spacetime is undistinguishable from the object resting on it, yet it produces distinguishable affects or it is not merely reducible to the object distorting it because it bears effects that span out to other objects. It is simply the possibility for there to be a vibration or a wave. Imagine a wavelength that runs through an empty room, you see the object against the space, that event as the object in space and the space part of the object is an abstraction, but because it is isolated first into that event and not a different event, and then further dissected into an object separate from space, and the space separated from the time that the objects continued being itself and not changes, we have now a distinction in nature.
But spacetime is ultimately the indistinguishable element of the universe, meaning where all these events and possible objects have not been distinguished, they all form a bundle of each other, like clusters of stars, spacetime is the dense cluster of all events. It is only when we focus on one event all other events fade away from that focus and that event becomes magnified against nothing, or empty space, which is a naturally measure of distinguishing things apart. Isolating a particular event from all possible ones is different from magnifying an object excluding other object. We magnify an object by making it the centre of attention, however an event in time is isolated by made the only present moment. When a particular kind of physicality is picked out like a wave, we have an object in spacetime,
If we assume that first, to be a determination of time, is second , to be determined by it, then we have a disconnect needing further explanation between a general schema applied equally onto a set of independently acting objects, while at the level of each particular occurrence the application of time becomes excluded as being generally applicable. It is not true that each object has a subjective determination of time and therefore time looses its universal substance, but rather that each unique occurrence of a particular object tells us exactly how time universally operates as a substantial duration. Time as a general schema applied to things is an imposition from a particularity having a finite set of relation to all possible things during a moment in time. It is an attempt of a finite entity to have relation with all possible things.
never follows through in the practical applications of physics and mathematics whom operate under the implied kind of thinking along the lines of; if time is a determination of the object, then the object is determined by time. The measure of time takes a limit as the standard by which a duration, sequence or pattern of behaviour to be distinguishable as having a moment of change. The limit governing conception of duration is the particular form of the object. In physics for instance the usage of an object is arbitrary because it can be any object but is necessary because an object is required for example to discern a measure of motion, gravity, light etc. Whether it be an electron, a ball, a star etc. The arbitrary principle is not that things are random without a rational basis but rather chaos is an ordering principle for properly organizing things because what appears to be randomness is the rational process of stirring up the situation so that things yield to their natural place, for example when the wind stirs up the leafs, they naturally float down onto the grass fields. Randomness is a true test to a determination yielding to its nature. that it has to be an object, it has to be somewhere before it is anywhere, it has to go through that event whether or sooner or later. In the ultimate sense, any principle in a vacuum is the extent of the principle before it is a limited conception; that there is no place for it to go because it is already here, there is no time for it to happen because it is already happening, time.
The idea of absolute time is intimately related with general gravitation
The first part of the law describes attraction and the second describes repulsion. Both attraction and repulsion are forces making up the magintude for a 3-dimensional figure.
Distorting spacetime
Einstein’s general relativity challenges Newton’s law by saying that gravity is not the force between two objects but is the result of the mass of the object distorting spacetime, which is the combination of the three dimensional space and 1 dimensional time. Gravity is not only the relation between two objects but it is rather the relation of each object having an effect on something other, a third, spacetime, which bears the relation between the two objects as distinct factors from each other. Spacetime is a shared dimension not merely in the sense of connecting objects but it is rather a feature of all objects.
Spacetime is commonly thought of as a plain that is warped and curved by the mass of an object, the common analogy is as if an object is placed on a napkin and forms a cradle in it . This image is correct in the sense that the effects of an object on spacetime can be observed as something independently from the object, that an object has an effect that spans outside of it to effect other objects, and can affect something unobserved like spacetime, but this does not mean that spacetime and the object are independent things, as if the object is one thing and the spacetime is another of which the placement of one over the other creates a curvature, which is what is observed as the distortion.
The object is observed to cause a curvature in spacetime, but this curvature in space that is supposedly caused by the object is not something other than the spacetime fabric itself forming the object. the distortion of spacetime is an abstraction if the form of the object. An event warps spacetime because it is that spacetime warped in the way the event is, takes that place in spacetime.
The spacetime observed around the object is the form that space takes over time, which is the gradient of the object in potential situations. The object is made up of spacetime, it is a particular manifestation and makeup of spacetime. An object is spacetime made up in that peculiar way.
Going in the object
Newton made time a general measure of things, e.g, this is how two people in the same area can agree on the time being 2o’clock afternoon, and in China it is 3am, depending on the location there is 13 hours difference, and this is still objective in the sense that if you would go to China you would rightly find it being that time. Einstein however said that time is not merely determined by the difference in the distance between objects, but that there is also an internal space, an inwardly dimension that makes any object itself a dimension, this is the spacetime implicit in each thing, but we say the object has an affect on spacetime by causing a curvature, but rather this so called “curvature” is simply the edge, or the event horizon at the outer-skirt circumference of the object before dwelling into it.
The object has an inward spatial as well as temporal dimension. At a “minute” level any object can be entered, the word means small in space as well as a short measure of time. For example, if we leave the planet earth from a certain distance it appears like a solid spherical mass, but given the small size of a human being relative to the earth, at a certain distance coming closer and closer to the earth, the individual can enter it eventually getting to the ground level where they can stand, the reason why they cannot go any further into the ground is because they become larger enough where they are unable to breakthrough into a more minute level relative to their object in contact.
Likewise two people cannot enter each other by mere contact because they are large enough where they can touch each other but they cannot penetrate each other, in other words, an object at a certain size, weight, mass, density, etc., relative to another object with similar measure becomes solid enough not to be penetrate and entered as a dimension. However certain micro-orbs bacteria can enter right through the skin wall of a man like man can enter through the atmosphere of the earth. In other words, any object can serve as a dimension for any other object given a big enough difference in their relative quantitative measures. This capacity where objects serves as dimension for other objects is the spacetime element in the object. The object itself is a dimension of time.
(Add to zooming) The object is a wormhole of infinite possible events
The matter of an object produces the warpage, and that warpage in turn manifest an inward tug, toward the objects centre.
The warpage we see as bending of spacetime is only an external affect the object has on its immediate exterminates as it is in motion. Spacetime continues inwardly into the object or rather an object seen from first person continues as a tunnel through spacetime
From a 2 dimensional point of view the object forms a tube. This tube like form of an object is its particle state extended as a wavelength, each part of the wavelength is occupied by a potential event of the particle state acting in a certain way, or all the possible way a particle state can take occupies a position in space minutely different and discrete from the other.
This is known as a wormhole. A wormhole is not merely the condensing of two places into the same point in prefer to restrict the time travel. Rather a wormhole is a phenomenon observed in nature
which explains how spacetime itself warps to form the structure of an object. Each object itself is a wormhole of spacetime, in the sense that it has a spatial extension infinitesimally inwardly within it, and it also has a temporal extension, that implicit in the object are all the possible events, any of which can be picked out as the present object.
Whitehead goes on to elaborate on Einstein’s spacetime notion by saying that the object itself is a time, in other words, an object directly observed constitutes an event. Any object directly observed at the present moment is just one of its possible events abstracted out as the real present situation. The object is therefore a tesseract of all it’s possible events held together by any one of them made real at the present moment. This explain simple phenomenon we take for granted like changing location of looking at something also changes its angles and geometry. In primary geometry the change in angle constitutes a change in shape, a figure changes its form by the simple adjustments of its angles.
The reason why the same wall appears different by changing the angle is because a different moments of that object is brought about by the distance covered in space. By simply moving three steps to the side, I was about to bring about a different moment that was a potential moment infinitesimally built in that object and make it into the real moment of the present, which is identified as both the object and the event, the event is the form and the object is the substrate the matter, both of which a are fundamentally the indivisible phenomena. Interestingly an “angle” is defined as the “space” between intersecting lines or surfaces at or close to the point where they meet.
An angle is the magnitude approaching a limit.
A wormhole is the way spacetime warps and wraps itself to form figures and structures of objects. This is ultimately observed as a “string” in string theory. These “strings” are minute and complexed fibres of spacetime that are the raw material, like puzzle pieces, that combine together to configure particular objects in the world. But unlike being merely spatial, that objects occupy an extensive amount of space, lines extend towards meeting each other forming figures and figures occupy a certain dimension of size, width, length etc., a figure that also involves time includes qualities that fill the space occupied by the measure of spatial extension, for example, timed fills a polygons with texture like the ones associated with hair, or smell, or colour, such qualities, like light fundamentally, is a quality of time because on their own they only exhibit a definite presence or not that presence, green is either the colour green or not green, it does not stop being green if it occupies more or less spatial extension, the colour green remains green no matter of the spatial extension it occupies.
Empirically we can argue that a concentration of green is more green than a faded green due to being expanded outwards. However this does not refer to the quality of green on its own but green as part of a multifaceted system. Green on a certain material that stretches, and the colour becomes less because it involves a certain degree of tone on a certain matter. But as to the inherent colour that makes it identifiable as green, it is no more green until it becomes red or a different colour, and red is no more red until it is something else. These are qualities of time because they exhibit an instantaneity of either being or not being what they are. Qualities of time also exhibit simultaneity in that they all exists at once all the time. It is only a spatial matter whether one occupies one place over the other, or whether one quality is picked out over the other.
(Add to series of events)
It comes out from the inside towards a point on the inside, and then goes inside that outside point, and so on and so forth.
It comes out of itself to be on one point on itself to go inside that point to the whole of itself.
rather the reference centre is the mind and the further the conception goes out of these possibilities the more concrete some of them becomes until one of them is the real event of the present. This real event of the present is where the infinitesimal series ends into a macroscopic scale.
The infinitesimal is like an inverted whirlpool whose smallest point originates as an abstract substance and develops into a concrete one. smallest does not mean single small thing but rather the abstract is small in the sense that it is the point that condenses an infinite amount of things within. The reason why there needs to be a singularity is due to the logic of entropy. There cannot be ultimate chaos with things having weight to them, or in other words there cannot be chaos of an infinite amount of concrete objects, as some would always cancel the other out, or that some pieces of mass would be part of bigger masses making them indistinguishable, and therefore ultimately there would be just one big piece of mass of which all other smaller pieces are indistinguishable from. There can only be an infinite amount of chaos when the concrete aspects of them is suspended. There can only be chaos in an abstract sense as the concrete aspects of objects like weight, mass, solidity, spin etc., when all these measurable effects are suspended, we can have a chaos of things as their interaction between two abstract objects does not render an effect on their form. The interaction between two objects in the abstract does not physically alter them yet can provide the knowledge as if they interact physically. and this point is a singularity condensing possibilities of events, and as it goes out from the mind into the perception of reality the potential events turn into the actual and real event directly being perceived which is definite and macroscopic.
Change the perspective and it becomes a different determination
The “warp” of an object in spacetime, is its continuing its time duration
But this process is not outside of the object but it is infinitesimally within it. It goes in, in, in, in the same place as the object is in.
We see that when a star collapses it results in a black hole and there is a singularity in spacetime. We see the singularity in spacetime when a star collapses because it is an extreme case where the stars entire energy is rapidly exhausted all at once at a very short time. And so the common image is that we see a star extended and looming into a small point in space. However the star as a particle state, a condensation of energy, is only looking at a wavelength from face forward point of view, looking at its first point and the end point of the wavelength and they appear to be the same point holding together the duration of the length. Every object is internally a wavelength inside itself and this comes out at the final moments of the duration, as they say “my entire life flashed before my eyes”
Spacetime as the material of the universe is everything, but it is rather everything in a potential state. What this means, or rather what it means to be a potential, is taken from the avenue of an observer, the perspective of which constitutes reality while outside of that is potentiality. But there are many observers, one can say an infinite amount of observers, and what’s real to one is a potential for the other, the duration from potential to actual is in flux across all observers.
A particular phenomenon, when we say it is the potentiality of everything we are saying it is the potentiality for a single thing to conceive everything. But a single thing cannot conceive everything all at once because it would not be able to pick it out as everything but it would just appear as one thing, or a collection of distinct things, therefore it must conceive everything as each single thing at different moments.
The difference between being and nothing is on the basis that being is everything and nothing is not everything, it is a single thing. The fabric of spacetime is literally everything, every possible event, but because we only pick out a single event in the potential of everything, we see everything as nothing, and nothing as what everything is or, a single thing. When we look at everything we are seeing it as a single thing besides nothing.
The ancient Islamic thinker ibn arabi says “Time is the fluid, space is the solid”
(Object at one place at one time) Whitehead says
“Science and philosophy have been apt to entangle themselves in a simple-minded theory that an object is at one place at any definite time, and is in no sense anywhere else. This is in fact the attitude of common sense thought, though it is not the attitude of language which is naïvely expressing the facts of experience. Every other sentence in a work of literature which is endeavouring truly to interpret the facts of experience expresses differences in surrounding events due to the presence of some object. An object is ingredient throughout its neighbourhood, and its neighbourhood is indefinite. Also the modification of events by ingression is susceptible of quantitative differences. Finally therefore we are driven to admit that each object is in some sense ingredient throughout nature; though its ingression may be quantitatively irrelevant in the expression of our individual experiences.” (145)
The “simple-minded theory that an object is at one place at any definite time,” is the attitude of classical mechanics. Sense recognition derives an appearance of rigidity wherein objects maintain an enduring identity over a general schema of time. Under classical mechanics and our ordinary understanding, time is a general duration within which everything is governed. The idea that time is a general measure of all activities is identical with meaning that time as a principle is shared by every object. In the latter formulation time becomes energy, the power for work.
As to whether time is a general element over all things tells us nothing about time as a function of each particular thing. It is a general rule that all things go through a duration of time but it is not equal to say that each thing is the same duration of time. Things determined by time is not the same as time is determination of things. For example, when we say that it is the same tree that endures thousands of years or it is the same man that lives for 90 years, both share in the factor of time, but time as their factor is dependent on the nature of their activity. It would be difficult to say that the a child is the same as an elderly, even though both belong to the same man.
This puts objects having different determinations as occupying different dimension of time, even though they both occupy the same space. A tree and a man are on different dimensions of time, and their relation to each other is spatial-temporal, it is not exclusively spatial nor exclusively temporal. This means that an experience may be one dimensional but not three dimensional. One dimensionally the operations of time is not limited to the spatial relation restricting two object, but time not limited to spatial extension operates as instantaneous point flashes of events, the same way as ideas constantly come and go in the mind, flash points of experience. Quantum mechanics is slowly but surely uncovering the dynamic of the instantaneous flash points underlying nature. (Add Higgs boson)
Whitehead explains the initial emergence of a basic quantum mechanics discovery, he says;
(146) “As long ago as 1847 Faraday in a paper in the Philosophical Magazine remarked that his theory of tubes of force implies that in a sense an electric charge is everywhere. The modification of the electromagnetic field at every point of space at each instant owing to the past history of each electron is another way of stating the same fact. We can however illustrate the doctrine by the more familiar facts of life without recourse to the abstruse speculations of theoretical physics.”
Quantum mechanics propose the opposite rule contrary to classical mechanics; ‘an object is at two different places at the same time’. This may not make sense spatially as because any given object occupies one position at any given time, but in terms of time, the same object may occupy an innumerable set of objects in its possible events. This fact revolutionizes the meaning of object to no longer mean an entity that remains the same during a change in time but extends the form of a duration and activity in the form of spectrum and wavelength, as characteristic of objects also. An object as a discrete measure must be complemented by the contentious process of its activity.
The intuition that derives this concerns an object is only discernible as the same in a moment that has itself been changed from previous moments. An object is no longer the same self identical component in a given moment in time but the identity that characterizes the “same” thing is now a spectrum, wavelength, that any particular complement falling within its scope is self-identifies the spectrum disclosing it. For example the person remains the same during childhood and adulthood because they lay anywhere on the spectrum of that process.
-Two place at the same time
When we say that the same object cannot be at two different places at the same time, it is likewise the same to say that two different events belonging to the same identity cannot be present at the same time, if I am sitting in the living room I am not in the washroom, and when I go to the washroom I am no longer at the living room. When I am having a cup of coffee I am not dancing and when I am dancing I am not having a cup of coffee.
In space we see the motion of an object occupying one space and abandoning another space, there must be a sequence of events that connect both spaces together as the same continuity of the object, because we cannot assume one point in space can be left and go to another without exposing the substrate that allows for this continuity in space, even if this substrate is not directly part of the relation of the two points.
the object in space and time is a particular realized events, it is a particle state, in a wavelength of potential events. However the duality is that we can only ordinarily observe one state when the other state is not observed
The Wave–particle duality is the concept in quantum mechanics that every particle or quantum entity may be described as either a particle or a wave. this distinction is really the difference between external and internal view of time. Each object like light for example, is the conjunction of this external and internal relation of being both particle and wave at the same time and not at the same time. Every object is a wavelength in the sense it has a series of potential events that each occupy a different position in space; and every object is a particle in the sense that from its first person point of view it occupies one of these potential events at a single time, or there is an identity that endures through each event at a single time .
This is a particle state in a wavelength space time. Spacetime is the matter that makes one object affect the other. Because if nothing is between two separate objects, how can one affect the other, or pull the other, in other words have a gravitational effect on the other. Spacetime is the material substrate where one object has an effect on the other, the object uses spacetime and warps it to affect another object. This explains quantum entanglement, because an object can affect another object over long distances since the affect it has on it is not merely spatially that both objects are within the same vicinity, but rather they relate as part of a sequence of events that required each other to result somewhere. In other words quantum entanglement is objects affecting each other in the realm of time not spatially.
Spacetime is demonstrated as a simple and basic mathematical grid and this is done for technical reasons but it is not organically accurate . A coordinate plane depicts the potential for motion in any direction along with capturing each change in the motion within the space of a small square. We can for example measure the peak of a curve
Spacetime as a coordinate grid is however only the abstraction for the potential qualities of a process whether it be in motion, gravity, mass etc. But in nature spacetime is the junction of all these qualities at once. Spacetime is the dimension of infinite diversity in quality and events, and it is only when we pick out a single event, all else go void, as there is space between events, and so we see the event within space, the distance away from everything makes everything not apparent and there is now a sequence of events integrated into a single self contained point
Instinct of time
When you get an urge to do something we call that instinct which is whatever fixed behaviour in response to a stimuli. The stimuli is taken to be an external objects like another animal or food source that stimulates a response from the sensory organs. these are only a set of direct forms of stimuli, there is however more fundamental stimuli like time and space which the sense organs are unconscious of but have an instinct for . There is an instinct in response to time and this is an urge we get in the form of a thought about something. For example when talking to someone and the urge comes to smack them because they are annoying, this urge is an instinct for a possible outcome, or rather the potential scenario itself creeps into the consciousness of the present moment, and wants to occupy the present, and the observer either acts on that or acts on some other possibility.
an unconscious recognition for a possible event, but we call it simply instinct as an emotional response, which it is, but what it is in response to is a possible event in time, smacking someone is a possible event following the present where they annoy you, and so the feeling of being annoyed if continued on to a certain degree results in the person being smacked, this is natural progression of time given that certain set of behaviour as related to other behaviour, the form a weblike structure that presuppose each other so long as one is continued to occupy the present. There are these routes of possibilities that spring out from any given action at the moment. The arousal of that instinct is an unconscious recognition of a possible event in time.
There is a fundamental instinct for a potentiality of an event, when you have an idea of a possibility, this is an appreciation of a possible event, which is real if acted on. The present transforms into that future when the individual acts on their idea. The individual is undergoing this metamorphosis of the present is constant by constantly changing into possible events,
The individual is a metamorphosis of the events making up time.
Our image of a timeline has obstructed a sense of how time flows through an individual.
Events are not laid outside the individual and the individual runs into them, but rather the individual is taking the form of the events, they are integrated in the individual
Time is not like a set of periods the individual enters upon but rather these periods are abstractions of recognizable changes, moments of changes the same substrate is undergoing but the understanding abstracts them as external forms from the subject undergoing them. If we look at the natural process of metamorphosis
We derive the idea of a timeline from the notion of time as a metamorphosis. Time is the internal transformation of a thing. What the understanding does is abstract from this transformation recognizable changes in the thing and then ranks it in accordance to when a change happens from the last to the most recent.
The stages of a life form is therefore ranked from early to late development. But this timeline of a thing makes the events external from it and there are good reasons for this because any given species involves different members of that species to be at different stages simultaneously, all the stages of development exists all at once at the species level, it is only at the individual level that they are going through these stages one point at a time.
For example, one single animal is in an adult stage while another is in childhood stage while another is in adolescence and nature presupposes this difference to be simultaneously present for the presupposition of each stage to even exists in its own, an adult bears the child in that it gives birth to it and a child bears the adult. The sense that it was once a child. And so we can take any single member of a species and have their developmental stages naturally abstracted outside of them by the other members of the species.
Events come out of each other
Cause and effect in the spatial domain requires that object be external to the other object to have an effect on it, in other words, the compactness that sustains one object coming into physical contact with the compactness of another object causing some alteration in physical composition, whether this be objects having a gravitational effect on others by warping spacetime, or the mass of each one directly colliding with the mass of another. These forms of transformations are what observation is used to studying because they exhibit a straightforward set of cause and effect dynamics, e.g, what goes up must go down.
The impact between two objects causes motion proportional to the momentum and size of mass. There is however a more subtle process of change that does not take place by the external effect of one object over the other but is only observable after having a period of time pass by, in other words, this form of change is not directly observable but is deduced as been done at some point in time. The reason why it is unobservable is because it is internal. This is difficult to explain because the internal side of any dimension is unobservable and this has something to do with the uncertainty principle as part of the observers nature, that when you observe something, you do not observe the observer making the observation, you either observe the object, or the observer as an object, you do not directly observer the observer as an object observing another object because that is where this entire relation comes out from. The conception of anything renders an inclusion of its inverse, which is what is not conceived, and is therefore the potential. What is not conceived is part of the observation but because it is not what is observed, it is the ground for what it is, when looking at the front you do not see the back, but it is there as the plain for it. Conceiving anything automatically means not conceiving the lack of that
This limitation is the positive affirmation of the conception to confirm anything at all, it limited it to a definite form and therefore an indefinite form is excluded or rather made limited. According to general relativity the mass of an object warps spacetime , and depending on the extent of the mass determines the degree in which spacetime is warped. In fact what we observe as one terrestrial body orbiting another, a planet orbiting a star for example, is really the smaller object circling the outer most extremities of the circumference of the spacetime bend.
However this illustration is only a two dimensional abstraction of an object bending spacetime because an object bends spacetime in all directions, 4 dimensionally, or rather where the object stands in spacetime, spacetime collapses into that object from every direction, and is thrown back with an equal force of the collapse forming a sphere of spacetime around the object.
Every object has a sphere of spacetime around it while at the same time every object has a Schwarzschild radius which is also a point in the object where spacetime enters through as an infinitesimal continuum. We say that a black hole absorbs light but does not reflect it and so how can something of this nature be a cause for a continuum? However any observation of a black hole does not absolutely take a black hole as independent from nature unless it is a pure abstraction. A black hole always plays some part in nature.
With the singularity diagram a singularity is illustrated as an infinitely extending or stretching of the spacetime fabric. However this two Dimensional illustration describes the motion of compacting within the same space an infinite amount of matter, compacting an infinite of thing within itself.
If we closely observer how the nature of sparks move, it does not look obvious whether the snarks are coming out or going in towards the hotspot.
This feature of a singularity as a point where mass is infinitely collapsing into the same space, is the way time moves. The development of time is the transformation of the event into other but really this transformation is a collapse of the event into another event, which is altogether the conception deriving one event and becoming unconscious of the other. And as events go deeper into the unconscious the become the past, which is also the same place where a future event may potentially be consciously grasped and therefore becomes the present.
Spacetime curvature is determination
Whether we say the singularity bends spacetime in a downwards upwards sideways or all these directions, means there is direction in the way spacetime is bent. But this so called “direction” is not in terms of position of motion, like up down left right, but even more primary than that it is dimensional, in other words, precursory for motion. The so called “warp” of spacetime caused by an object is actually the dimension of the object, or rather duration and length of its dimension where the object changes develops and yet remains still, the dimension of the object is itself, and so it is entering into itself, and that’s how it remains a still the same object.
The genius in Einstein’s idea of spacetime is that it makes time for the first instance material. Spacetime is the “thinnest” layer of matter, which means it is the most abstract physical substance yet still has concrete effects. Spacetime is not a single thing that is abstract but it is everything in a more abstract state. One of the first instances of these physical but abstract states is space itself which is the quality that allows the motion of a thing from one place to another, or rather facilitates the change of thing. Time allows change to happen by containing it. Space is not a thing that contains everything as this is actually an abstraction of space, that we perceive a maximum amount of space containing a maximum amount of things and therefore conclude that space contains all things. But rather the quality of space is simply in that something may be the container of some other thing. That something may be the realm for something else to act. For example shining a light in an atom, changes its motion or stop its motion, this explains how one object is the dimension for the other to act or lack of
For example “laser cooling of atoms” or “quantum cooling” are techniques in which atomic and molecular samples are cooled down to near absolute zero. Laser cooling techniques rely on the fact that when an object (usually an atom) absorbs and re-emits a photon (a particle of light) its momentum changes.
the process would cool the object to its pure quantum state at which all thermal energy is removed. At the physically impossible-to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, atoms would stop moving.
This absolute motionless state of an object is the most abstract state of an object and is space itself. Now while space allows a realm for change to occur, it is itself changeless and therefore the other quality, the change itself, is defined by time. Time is the duration where a set of changes are discerned to happen, for example we say it takes this and this amount of time for this to happen, but time is rather these changes, in other words, time is the change of a set of possibilities into actual ones. When a thing changes, these changes are time itself.
(Go to holographic universe)
Conception plays both roles active and passive
The difficulty is that the conception plays both roles – the active determination and the passive one. When it is active it brings to consciousness the knowing the fact but this is also its active feature, that through the examination and analysis of a thing it comes to know it that involves dissecting and unpacking the object, it involves dissipating a knowledge that is already given and changing that to an unknown. The active and the passive sides of the conception must be carefully attuned to when reading an idea because any concept exhibits both of these sides simultaneously except in the same determinate ways. For example, the apple falls to the ground is passive because of general graviton from the ground attracts the apple because it has more mass, this conception is of the apple to the ground. However when the apple falls down to the ground, it is also simultaneously going away further from the sky. Likewise when a helium balloon rises up away from the ground, it is coming closer to the sky. The latter makes sense because helium is a very light substance and lighter objects like air are attracted to lighter objects.
the external sum set of all possibilities that is internally contained by the actuality of any of their actual occurrence.
What we have is a common depiction of a grid and a sphere particle state warping the lines
The fact of general relativity wherein the extent of warping spacetime is equally proportional to the mass of the object, indicates that the object is a specific point where the mingling of spacetime meet in certain definite ways. In order for the object to affect spacetime, the nature of spacetime itself must yield to this change. The object is the discrete measure that disclosed the sum set of possible actions and determinations, I.e, the objects potential energy. The potential behaviours and determination the object may take in spacetime corresponds to the internal structuring that making up the form of the object. For example, the circular motion of a planet inversely corresponds to the shape of it. So that how an object acts on the outside in spacetime is an inversion abstracting how it is structured on the inside,
The motion of heavenly bodies is spherical not circular – their motion is identical with their form, but their firm is just one instance of the motion at one point in time.
A circle is an abstraction of a sphere
P’ is the inverse of P with respect to the circle. The circle in this relation constitutes the form for the first condition of the inversion that the inversion of any point inside the reference circle must lie outside it, and vice versa. The circular constitutes a conception of internal and external, and follows from this the second condition that the nearer a point to the centre, the further away its transformation, and vice versa. As a point approaches the centre its inverse outside the circle is going further away from the centre. This simple relation of inversion geometry complicated itself manifold with complex objects like a planet and it’s terrestrial motions. Like the suns motion around its star involves much more variability in orbit than a planet around a star. Planet and stars do not orbit in a fixed circular motion but over millions of years constitutes more of a spherical motion. The orbits of planets is analogous to planes flying around earth.
planets is analogous to planes flying around earth.
This explains why the earths magmatic field tends to move around. Scientist are recently finding out that the magnets north and south are very mobile points and the magnetic north is discovered to move much faster than previously anticipated. It is recently discovered that earths magnetic North Pole is shifting south. This is an abstraction of the direction in which the earths spherical motion is heading.
Spacetime curvature
http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/geometry_force.html
Gravitational curvature is intimately connected with the geometry of space and time. geometric forms are held together as structures by their logical presupposition of each other. The physical bonding force of this result is Gravity. Gravitational “curvature” abstracts the spherical form of spacetime.
Gravity as pure principle is said to be an “illusion” illustrated by the “equivalence principle” – A freely-falling, observer in a gravitational field does not feel gravity. Something in acceleration has a concept of up and down but something in free fall, not in motion, does not have this concept. Motion is something that exhibits relation, in the finite sense from here to there, in the ultimate sense self identical. This free falling state is the inconceivable conception disclosing object, but so far as it is object, there is gravity.
For example, when I am moving relative to the wall, the wall appears to be in motion in relation to the conception of it. What becomes a stable position is the conception that moving across its object makes its object appear to be in motion, and the object so far as being spatially moved across bears the extension for the conception to be in motion.
accelerated observer has a clear notion of “up” and “down” – when he looks up, he sees all freely drifting observers and their space stations “fall downwards”, in the direction of his own spaceship’s floor. “Upwards” is the direction in which his spaceship is accelerating. But there is no gravity in this situation. All the observers in freely drifting spaceships (rocket engines shut off) are in agreement: The fact that the accelerated observer sees objects “fall” is merely an artefact, brought about by his spaceship’s acceleration – it vanishes as soon as you leave the accelerated reference frame and change to a free-falling one.
(Add to how to make a sphere)
The achievement of Einsteins general theory of relativity is found in the simple connection of spacetime continuum which enables time to be measurable by space and space is measurable by time. This simple application of one concept onto the other defines the complex scope of energy. Energy is property of matter manifest as capacity to perform work. As to the question of the production of this work is an issue identical with the very performance itself.
Spacetime is measured by gravitational curvature which is directly related to the energy and momentum of whatever matter is present. Curvature of spacetime is governed by the extent of the energy, for example the denser the black hole the greater gravitational distortions.
If light has no mass how can gravity bend it?
gravitational effects are the result of the warping or curving of the “fabric” of spacetime.
Bending of Light is due to the Gravitational Lensing. Gravitational lensing works in an analogous way and is an effect of Einstein’s theory of general relativity – simply put, mass bends light. The gravitational field of a massive object will extend far into space, and cause light rays passing close to that object (and thus through its gravitational field) to be bent and refocused somewhere else. The more massive the object, the stronger its gravitational field and hence the greater the bending of light rays
However the extent alone does not explain the form that the extent assumes. The curvature of spacetime is not mere distortion caused by the gravitational power of some terrestrial body like star, but gravitational curvature inversely concerns how the fabric of spacetime itself bends and warps to constitute the formation of energy. (Add to squaring the circle, and period into line into circles are all formations of spacetime curvature)
(add to “like 4 dimensional cube” mind organism)
bodies such as stars are focal points of light concentrate. Stars are relation of attraction and repulsion to synthesize light the degree of magnitude is determined by the energy concentrate. Gravitational attraction of light takes the form of the physical gas properties of hydrogen and helium. The repulsion radiates elements in the form of heat containing these along with small amounts of many other elements such as neon, iron, silicon, magnesium and sulfur. These form the basis for rocky planets. The extent of 3rd degree burns takes on different form on the skin than first degree. The curvature of space time is an abstraction of movement from stable position. From the perspective of spacetime curvature space is abstraction of movement whose energy states are conceptions of moments of process. This is how space is measured by temporal dimension.
(Add Hegel here time)
According to general relativity, Past, present and future are measurable as spatial dimensions. (Add here problems with causation, past moment does not lead to future one because we take this causal relation as a present with a past and future. This does not explain the nature of causation because it always leaves out that which is previously caused to cause some later event.) the future is a spatial point on the curvature of spacetime because spacetime is itself in motion. The future is not merely to be caused but that it is something to get to. If I make my way to the gym, the gym becomes my future. For example, if two points A and B on a moving plain, and A is stationary on the moving plain while B is moving in the moving plain, we have A following the movement of the plain being identical to the plain as it is heading wherever the movement of the plain is heading, but B moving on the moving plain is able to reach the place where A will eventually reach. B is the future event of A simply because its movement constitutes place where A will reach.
This is why nothing is the speed of light because light is the standard of material measurement it is that which has already reached the movement of any form that an object can potentially take. In physics, the speed of any given object + the speed of light = the speed of light (minute physics) this is because light is the bare minimum substrate implicit in each object, in the primacy of material substratum light precedes any particular object but in the ultimate principle of determinacy, light supersedes all object. The level of foundation is measured the level of somethings foundation is measured by how ultimate its determinacy. What is meant by the ultimate principle as the foundation is correlative with determinacy to always supersede. This concept is most applicable to the ancient maxim of the “one and many”. The one and many are not meant to merely distinguished one particular thing from many relations but the goal for this distinction is to find the one relation implicit in the many. Yet this one is also not merely one among the many for the many are all one, therefore the relation of one and many is meant to elucidate how it is possible for everything to be in something. (Add to the Hindu jewels)