Section 26 (first updated 1.16.2021)
Our modern accounts of what constitutes development in the evolutionary context is heavily dependent on the observation of the physical differences between life forms that have been acquired through out different time periods. Modern evolution is very physically oriented and looks at the “use and disuse” of physical attributes of an animal, like it’s claws, horns, peaks, eyes, nose etc., and how the animal physical composition changes depending on its adaption to it’s environment. But if we look at the most important feature which is the only thing that can measure the developmental differences between life forms, I.e., mental capacity. We know that the mind is central in its significance of being important as a feature of a living organism because like the nucleus of a cell, the mind is the part where activity originates from into physical actions and behaviours. In other words, the mind is the command control mother board of a life form. However the mental feature, which has the central feature of ordering randomness into coherency, is casted as merely one of the many other physical traits that so happen to be randomly achieved in evolution. Yet it is the very feature that we use in distinguishing the human being from all other animals, and it is the feature that distinguished animals from each other.
Physical fitness is highly related to mental fitness, and among the higher developed animals, like mammals, their development is related to their mental fitness against the elements of nature. We take it for granted that a bear has a lot of fur and therefore handles the winter, but we do not realize that the bear is still battling extreme cold climate conditions with a limited time frame, he only has a certain amount of energy reserved just enough to hunt, and if he does not make the hunt, he may very well die. Things we take to be entirely physical are tasks for mental fitness as well.
Yet the mind is entirely different feature than all other physical features of evolution and is the only feature which does not have randomness, but purposiveness, as its quality. This means that when we look at an evolutionary acquired characteristic like fur of an animal or a claw, we can say there may be randomly acquired in the sense of, they are given to the animal, by heredity, or by the environment, without the preconception of the animal. In other words, bears are born to have fur. However, the mind, what will the animal do with their claw or jaw, that depends on the mental capacity of the animal, which is not merely given in a peculiar way, but must foe through semi unique experiences.
The mind is not entirely physical, it is something else, whether we call it mental, abstract etc., it is not merely physical like a peak, or a claw, or a nose etc., and so it is not determined by physical circumstances, or rather has freedom and pure self determination. When we say something has free will, we assume that their agency comes from their ability to maneuver within their environments by choosing certain objects over other objects. But this standpoint can not offer a fully comprehensive analysis of freedom because the consciousness akin to any organism begins in a definite environment predetermined in a certain order. Consciousness also always finds itself in a body that it finds itself in. The body is also a particular determinism of nature, e.g., it lives a certain length of time, has specific feature for hunting, breathing, digesting etc., how did the consciousness of the organism come to know the need for any of these features prior to the occupancy of its body? Darwinian evolution answer this simply with the idea of heredity, where the experiences of prior ancestors resulted in the influence of forming the body and its specific needs of a genus to which any individual organism belongs to. However the species is, in the first place, complied out of a set of unique individuals, and so the question of, “which is first, the egg or the chicken?”, the species or the individual? The form or the object?
A comprehensive description of freedom has to explain how the entire particular circumstances of a life form have been determined prior to any single one choice throughout the experience of it.
Developmental in the universal sense is a mental activity, it is the abstract of how consciousness comes towards a particular circumstance it inhabits. This does not merely mean that development is measured by animals gaining more and more features or by becoming more and more aware of themselves, but also concerns how can this even be achieved in the first place. The way consciousness develops is by its ability to remain virtues, this mean doing the right decisions at the right time. But even more fundamentally for this to happen, consciousness must develop the ability of concentration. The use of the word “concentration” here does not only include the mental ability of focusing on something, but more broadly is the process of energy concentrating at the same point so as to be identical with the conception of it.
We may ask how does the skills acquired by an animal life form help them once they are dead? One answer is that it becomes passed on through thier genes. Genes tells us that physical traits like horns and body parts remains from parent to offspring, but these traits are aspects from a mental source. The horn remained because it was used by the organism to fulfil some purpose the animal conceived. All the physical properties passed on by genes belong to a more fundamental continuing agent that endures throughout generations. It is the assumption that this substance is the quality of consciousness because there has to be the feature which recognizes that horns will be necessary for the offspring as much as it was for the parent. When we say something is passed on through generations, this should not suggest that the thing being passed on is like some kind of object being thrown around.
The individual life form once it’s particular body dies, it’s consciousness endures and continues into the dimension of eternity, in this dimension there is an infinite amount of possible life forms. Consciousness universally is somehow influence by the particular position it comes out of during the death of a life time. The infulance of the particular lifetime on the general consciousness operates as follows. Universal consciousness enters upon a particular stage of consciousness, call it a lifetime of a single organism, the events within the lifetime of a particular organisms is the energy flow consciousness universally uses to repel it out into infinite state of eternity.
Consciousness universally enters upon a particular life path, and depending on the nature of what happened during the lifetime, if the life was complex, consciousness is repelled with greater velocity into infinity can can last longer within eternity, this in-turn allows it to enter upon a higher and more developed state. While if consciousness during a particular lifetime died too quickly, or did not actualize a set of experiences it will default to a lower more primal state of life. For example if a bird, hunts, sustains itself too adulthood, reproduces off springs and cares for them by building nest for them and protecting them than lives to a relatively longer life of birds, that state of consciousness has acquired enough energy and momentum to stay longer in the infinite state of eternity, and the longer it stays there the more likelihood it can enter upon a higher state of consciousness, it becomes a more developed organism, let’s say a mammal, as the measure is more developed animals come later on in time. If we take another scenario of a different life path I’d a bird, say a bird that has not even hatched yet and gotten eaten while still as an egg by a lizard. This state of consciousness in that unfortunate state of the bird dieing early has not acquired the necessary life expierence as the enough energy to propel it forward in infinity to remain a bird or become something higher, it’s consciousness is too weak and defaults to a more primal life form, say a worm or a maggot insect, which has a very inactive and limited experiences equivalent to a bird in a fetus position, but unlike a bird in an adult form.
The consciousness which has not acquired the mental skills of concentration during its particular life time will be the weak form of Consciousness universally because it will be unable of the concentration required to last and endure for a longer period of time within infinity, therefore it defaults to a finite and primitive life path, it becomes a fly or a lizard as the reincarnation ideologies say. It is impossible for Consciousness to endure infinity because it’s quality is made to pick out a specific form, the task is in its ability to endure as many passing life paths as possible and not be any one of them. the more time passes through this temperance the more it can enter upon a higher life path because the more time has passed within eternity is therefore equal to more development.
More and more conceptions appear the more into the infinite wormhole the mind enters. As universal consciousness enters infinity it is attracted by particular events it is bypassing, and eventually a particular event will capture its attention so much that it develops concentration on it and becomes identical with it so as to be actually that event itself. It becomes that life form living that particular life path, and that particular life form would than in turn be looking back at its universal self, the very same look that attracted it in the first place. The universal consciousness becomes attracted by a particular consciousness so as to become it, but that becoming of a particular is that the universal can be propelled out of it into eternity so that it can pick out the particular in the first place. This dynamic between particular and universal is a fundamental relation that simultaneously exists in nature.
More events naturally appear as consciousness enters into infinite continuum
These are objects that coexist with each other in an environment, but what we see as set of objects coexisting in an environment also all exists within an event that coexist with another event. How can the present event transition to a future event if the future event has no prior existence, where did the future event come from? It is often said that “things just happen”. In ordinary conception of time observed by normal sensible faculties, it is only the coexisting of objects within the same moment that is observed, but the moment for sensation does not simultaneously coexist with any other moment, it only follows after or before another moment.
But if time is truly within space and is indivisible from it, than we have to grant that it also abides by its principle, just like space in-turn abides by the principle of time. Every moment is in space, and every space discloses a moment. Space is separated from itself, it is outside itself by being the disclosure of a moment, and space is continuous because time continuously flows through and fills space, or rather time itself is continuous within space
The idea that “time is getting faster” is explained by the notion that the more continuum into the wormhole the conception enters the more unique set of events happen. More is conceived and therefore time appears to be faster, as in comparison for example someone sitting in the waiting room, or waiting for that last minute of class to finish, seems to take forever, because little is going on.
This dimension looks like a wormhole with infinite possibilities of each possible event sticking out of each other. Events come out of each other because they are within the same space. A fundamental feature of object being in the same space is that they come out of each other, i.e., “man begets man”.
This is where the idea of reincarnation starts to make sense. Consciousness enters an infinite stream of possible life paths, and the weaker versions of itself default to the lower life forms, with the lower level of consciousness, e.g., insects, lizards, mice etc., while the stronger, the more concentration and focused, which is measured by how long it can withstand eternity, defaults to the higher beings, e.g., humans and perhaps even higher beings. Each of these beings from the highest to the lowest form a feedback loop where they reproduce themselves over and over again.
What we call heredity is merely the feedback loop maintaining a certain level of conscious experience. It maintains the same degree of consciousness that keeps defaulting back to that level. Heredity is the maintaining of a fish as a fish, a dog as a dog, a monkey as a monkey, a man as a man, etc., irrespective of the general upwards trend of development. The fact that a man evolved further than a monkey is a different aspect of evolution, than the fact that there are monkeys still maintains themselves as monkeys. We assume that throughout generations there is a constant progressive development, each new generation is more developed than the prior. But this is an abstraction from the present point of view because from a particular point of view there is always more development beyond it, and that is relative to it.
In the present, the observer can always look back at the way things developed in the past, and than can look forward to the potentiality of what they might become. And so there is an interesting outlook of idealism in this natural conception of time that says; the way things are going are better than the way they happened because in this claim is projected the idea that it ‘ought to be better’. The past is undeniable in the way it happened, e.g., if I broke my hand in the past, this becomes a fact, and if in the future I healed, the future of the hand healing necessarily depends on the past where the hand broke. There is the assumption that the future necessarily follows from the past. In this case change always comes from something other than itself, in other words, change happens when something always comes from something other than itself.
Take for instance reproduction in the sexual or asexual domain. Sexual reproduction concerns the unity of two separate objects to produce one object, while asexual is one object replicating itself into two or more objects. In either case, the cause of coming into being is derived from somewhere else independent of the thing endearing the transition — change comes from somewhere else. In the case of sexual reproduction, the offspring comes out of the parents which is related but different than themselves, while in asexual reproduction the same organism enters a new form after which it invariably leaves a previous form.
But in order for something other to arise out of something self-identical, than we have to ask what about something that is not identical with anything? Than the answer is simply the totality that includes the identity, then the other, then the other as some identity not identical with the first identity which is also an other relative to that identity which is an other to itself. In this jargon we have the initial beginning for answering the very nature of the development of time itself, which unlike the fleeting moments of our particular experience, there are fundamental moments that are among the most permanent conditions of nature.
The way consciousness develops in the infinite state of all possibilities, unfolds into three perspectives of consciousness that correspond to 3-dimensional states of spacetime.
The first dimension is a line connecting any two points, this means that it has no width or depth — only length, it is a wavelength. The feature of this first dimensional wavelength is not merely in the length disclosed between the two end points, nor is it in the dimension being alone, single and one, but is rather in the space parallel to the length in-between it and two or more other lengths not connected by the two same end points.
The presupposition of the first dimension is not that there cannot be multiplied wave lengths, but that the wavelengths themselves do not intercept. The first dimension is marked off by things being parallel to each other, as long as dimensions are not intercepting each other and remain parallel to each other, they are in the first dimension. The first dimension is also the first instance of mathematics, it is the principle of arithmetic, the study of numbers and the function of addition onto them that requires that each count stays parallel to the next, even though the point is to combine the numbers together, their combination is only sought as a single entity that remains independent and parallel from another distinct combination. No one said that the first dimension has to only be one object only that they do not combine by contact. The moment two lines intercept each other, they become a second dimension.
a 2-dimensional plain flipped on its back, instead of facing you straight, imaging grabbing a computer screen and instead of it facing you, place it on the ground facing up, this is a 2-dimensional within a 3 dimension.
The second dimension happens when two lengths intercept each other, and their point of interception makes their unity develop some kind of shape. The second dimension is marked off by a second line that branches off from or crosses the first.
A junction is a point at the intersection of two lines where they both become indispensable from each other. In a “no junction” you can still pick out which line is which at their intersection.
We have to ask what is presupposed whenever two lines intercept each other?
In the junction the no-junction is not revealed but it is still there. The point being the interaction between two lines is still compatible with the lines being parallel, in fact the point emphasizes the parallelism of the lines.
The presupposition is that there is a third-point, which is the point of the interception itself, be it a 90 degree angle, acute angle, a shape like a triangle, or two lines intersecting each other like a cross sign. The shape itself is a third result independent from the lines that interacted to form it. It is important to explain how the first dimension gets to the second dimension.
The first dimension does not only mean one or a single dimension. The first dimension has not only one wavelength but two or infinitely many wavelengths, the only condition of being a first-dimension is that the lengths stay parallel and do not intercept. The second dimension is marked off by the interception of these two lengths. The question becomes how can two parallel lines intercept each other.
In computer technology for example, when You make a website, you use “hyperlinks”, one window to govern and control another. This is almost like how one dimension intercepts to control another.
The second dimension has both length and width. The width comes from the intercepting line. But in the first dimension where does the width come from, it is not found in the length but is found outside the length in the plain, width is a feature of the plain not the line,
even though width has length, it is not the case that length has width, at least in this primary way.
a world that only has two dimensions appears “flat” When perceived through the width. If we look at something only through its width, that presupposes there to be depth, yet a first and second dimensions lack depth.
Depth is therefore a feature of the 3rd dimension, but how can we get from the second to the 3rd dimension, where is this depth implicit in the first and second dimension? In the first depth must have been implicit in the quality of the lengths being parallel to each other. In the second dimension it was implicit in the width and height that makes up a shape, in other words, the shape against the plain.
Look into the in-between space
The order may be backwards and not forward from what we necessarily assume in our mathematical accounts. In our mathematical accounts the measure of quantity is only derived to go in one direction, but this is only a rule to do one action at one time. The concept “To subtract” or the actions of subtracting is a sub form of an abstraction. This means that you can only go in one direction during one duration. One implication is that the time in which something happens, and the place where it happens, do not necessarily coincidence. Like counting can only be done in one direction way at one variable at a time. If I am counting in the positive, in my next step I can only go into a positive variable. 1 has to go into 2, I cannot go into -1. But once that step is taken, it can now go into the opposite direction to the one previous, I can go from 2 to -1. From a three-dimensional point of view, the observer can perceive them as two-dimensional cross sections of these objects. A ball, for example, would look like a circle.
As the saying goes “read between the lines” speaks truly as a principle of consciousness.
In-between the space disconnecting the two wavelengths connected by two external points not connected by each other, there is depth into the space making it distinct from both wavelengths yet similar in sharing their essetinal feature that they share with each other, the plain as no discernible width, length, etc., but it still has the extension that is extending into an indefinite point, this does not mean that it goes indefinitely because it started from a definite point, which is the parallelism of the two lengths and so that is a presupposition to its indefinite depth between them.
Zoom into space
In other words, their essetinal nature is the extension itself, the action or the movement and not only the result that is exhibited by it reaching a definite point. The function of a plain is after all to be “plain” of any specific quality, and so therefore it only has the quality that there is a possibility for a quality, the potentiality to stubble upon a quality. The third dimension is the essence itself of two distinct dimension, that is distinct from both, but encompasses them together as well.
And you find no more differently than what you were looking at in the first place, because in the first place you are already in the process of zooming onto a spectrum differentiated from spectrums
The 3rd dimension shows up the moment we have the conception of a third object in relation to the unity of the two or more forming the second dimension. The difference between the number of objects making up a 2-dimensional plain as opposed to a 3rd dimension, is related to each individual object having a relation to each other individual object, and not 1 individual object having a relation to the group. When 1 individual object has a relation to the unity constituting the group of objects, then we have a dimensional change.
The third dimension closes up the first two rows onto each other by doing what they both do simultaneously, in other words it zooms in-between the space that is indifferent to the first dimensions distinct from itself infinitely, it keeps a gap between every particular instance of that unity, and takes that gab itself, and fills it with each particular instance, as the passage way to the infinity of all possibilities of each of those instances. And when you zoom into one place on the continuum that so called one place brings about with it many other points that instantaneously becomes clear when the distance is covered to clarify the first point.
its the group of objects making up one dimension relative to another group of objects within another dimension
How can you get many variety from the same thing? How to use the same material to make different conceptions.
The lines that intersect is due to the conception changing. A line is vertical but change the conception and the same line becomes horizontal. Now change the conception but maintain both at the same time, you have now an intersection, the first discernment of shape. These different conception of consciousness become imprinted as permanent moments in nature. They are such fundamental moments that they have the longest durations of time in the universe.
There is a parallel first dimension to every first dimension. Hegel calls consciousness the reflection in being. This is what density is, When the parallel distance is reduced between these dimensions, they form a compactness, which are the moments reaching an absolute limit to each other, one moment can never be the other because both are fundmentally is the first dimension, which means that if one becomes the other it wouldn’t be differentiated as itself and therefore both would be the exact thing. But there is slight differences from moment to moment and this is mitigated by an infinitesimally small space, in other words a “minute” space, which is what we know as one minute. The word “minute” as an adjective means significantly small, in Latin “minutus” means ‘made small”; or as a plural noun it means “sixtieth of an hour” which is also the distance covered in sixty seconds by moving from one place to another. A minute is a space in time where a series of moments intersect closely possible to each other to form a certain measurable period in time. I say “measurable” because when we enter into the realm of seconds and milliseconds, the measurable aspects increasingly diminishes into an unmeasurable point of time, which is where the moments cannot be differentiated from each other by the space that constitutes them. A minute or this minute space between moments is where consciousness peaks at to find the next moments.
You find the same line you were just looking at, because why else wouldn’t you, because how were you looking at the line in the first place? The concept proves itself with the consciousness of itself.
And when the focus is strong enough, this closes the similar moments together. It pulls them close to each other from a bundle of infinite mess of possibilities, and the duration becomes a clear path of the same continuum event when something specific is picked out form all of it. The third-dimension is dense with itself, therefore it is the only dimension where the two first previous dimensions appear to be the same one, it is a synthesis of the two opposite propositions.
Dense with itself
This is all the dimensions coming so close to each other they form the same dimension, a particular wavelength extending within the depth of itself, and because each moment is so alike and close to the present one, they form a similar situation. The infinite possibility of itself begins as a scattering of all random events crisscrossing each other, and “entanglement” of spacetime, but the un-entanglement of this these dimension takes hold when consciousness focuses so ever concentrated onto one point on the spectrum, that the consciousness itself becomes one and identical with the duration of the continuum.
This is the form of what is called a “slab of nature” in the continuum of space time. In other words, it is a piece of spacetime itself, an abstraction of it focused on by consciousness, and the more focus it develops into it, the more it becomes identical with it, the dimension separating the space series of continuum filter out is more of that process
It pulls out one of them from the bundle of infinite mess of them.
This is the bare structure but now add infinite quality. A quality supposed diversity, that there be things different from each other, and also supposes identity, that each thing is a unique and separate thing, and commonality, each and every unique and different thing is common in having this feature of uniqueness. This infinite quality is the matter used and is the content used to make up any single one of infinity.
Moment within a moment
(Find the picture of the ocean sunset)
This is what motion is, the process of turning his head involves every moment imprinted onto space.
If we assume that there is space everywhere, or that space is present invariably in any phenomena, than space is also an aspect of time. That between moments there is space, we call them “minutes” for externally small.
The reason why the ordinary appearance of things does not appear to be a disconnected Fragments of conceptions of moments in time, but rather a duration of a spatially extended vacuum full of fully integrated concentrated points, is because there is such a concentration onto each of the possible points that the universal conception itself becomes a divides into each and one of the object conceived by it. Imagine each object within a general conception has a correlated conception of it that maintains it. There is a corresponding conception correlated to a distinguished phenomenon within the spectrum field of infinite possibilities, that variable element develops this conception from it and into themselves and therefore integrates it into a self contained system of that very same process it came to pick out a single particular thing from everything as a universal in the first place. each object disclosed within a variable conception has an invariable connection with a broader conception beyond it, so that to conceive it in and of itself, and not as something other, which could also be a thing in and of itself from the point of view of the other. It is these “derivations”, which is a term to describe the motion of a thought process prior to any precondition for it, in other words, it uses the material that is only readily available, which being the subject matter itself, to do whatever is not itself, the opposite place where itself is only potentially there. For example, you take the same vertical line and turn it to the side and it becomes horizontal.
To say that the particular is an expression of the universal means that the universal is the activity that produces from it various kinds of reactions, or differences, a set of static and objectified abstraction, which we come to label as the ordinary objects of every day life, but even these set of abstractions that formulate a field of objects, is itself one of an infinite of other unperceived abstractions . The universal experiences itself through the particular differences of itself. And each of these differences are the ethical characteristic of the individual.
The basic principles of nature; time, space and light are universal determinations of reason. They are universal in the sense that they are applicable in any dimension of reason. They are true in the mind as they are outside in nature. Each of these principle is more fundamental than the other, but it’s fundamentality is that it is carried out as a derivative in every other principle. In our modern empirical sciences we say one principle may contains the other but the other may not contain the one princole which contains it, which is an absurdity in logic. It sounds good to say that space contains light but light does not contain space, because see light always within a vacuum in space, but it is only implicitly derived that space is within a substance like light.
Quantum mechanics says this is the role of the atom which takes on two forms, wavelengths and discrete particles. Light looks like it is within space, but change the distance and go closer within the contents of light, and light appears to be itself a wavelength, a continuum which is an extended space containing something else within it, light as a wavelength contains discrete energy points. (Find picture of circle of light is within light.)
You can work backward from this process by looking at any single thing before your vision. We can either zoom into the microscopic structure of it through a microscope, or zoom out through a telescope, in either cases we witness more of entities different from each other in quality and separate from each other in space. If we change the ordinary duration of time as normally experienced by the mind, by taking drugs for instance; especially psychoactive drugs, activate the ordinary ability of the mind to an unordinary degree, we see that every moment itself in time is spaced out by a gale of void inept from anything. In other words, that same gab when focused on now revealed a whole new world of Infinity of things it is holding. When we look out into the universe and see the many galaxies, we are no more than looking between the different moments in time of events.
When consciousness leaves a particular manifestation of itself, for example a body, this means that this particular sequence of time has run its course. The moment at the end of someone’s life is the moment that consciousness reverts to a more fundamental and universal form, this is only a matter of time before it happens, like it is only a matter of time before death. The process where life becomes a particular than emerges as a universal is a fundamental cycle apparent in the way all energy sources behave in the universe.
Stars for example come out of a star-forming nebula, which was a result of having reached the end of its life and exploded outwards. The outward appearance of a collapsed stare is a nebula, but implicit in that nebula are supernovas, neutron stars , and even black holes. In other words, when a star explodes outwards and disperses into space, that is the exact moment it is born back, or rather retreats into its more fundamental energy form, as a singularity. This singularity is a very dense and concentrated form of energy that theoretically is the initial beginning of any energy state including stars. In the Big Bang theory, the universe began as a concentrated form of energy like a singularity, and it exploded outwards , the dispersion of which includes every possible object in the universe. Modern theories suggest that after the initial explosion the universe will eventually slow down and die out as a cold empty place. This speculation is proved wrong by the other equally viable one, which says that the universe is accelerating, getting faster and faster, expanding outwards, but even this is proven not entirely correct by the other speculative notion, that the universe will collapse outwards than back onwards into itself. (Find where you talk about this model of the universe)
the bell curved graph of a thing peaking to the highest point than dipping is an abstraction of a natural cycle concurring in any object subject to time. When we see a star live it’s life than end in an explosion, that explosion is simultaneously the beginning for the life cycle of another star, which we say is “another” star, but this “another” might just very well be the notion of star generally,
This energy state where something begins as concentrated point than expands out into a dispersed plain, than back into a point is a fundamental behaviour observed throughout the universe. And the reason for this is because it is a physical manifestation of an example of consciousness reverting into a particular state and than back into a universal one. The continuity of development is this fluctuation. The process we observer always moving forward towards a more complex and advanced state is merely an abstraction of one section a circular duration, the curve is an abstraction of one section of a circle.
Particle collider
Particle collider reveals a potential moment in time.
What they try to do with the particle colliders is to smash two particles together so that their combined energy can form a flash, and that flash for a few instances reveals a third proton, but it is not just revealing a third object, but it is rather revealing one possibilities, or rather a potential event of the proton that is just out of space of the present proton, I.e., the proton in a future moment.
In normal mechanics two objects colliding repulse each other. But at the subatomic levels, the collision of two particles either combine together and mutate into one or in two many different particles. How can we explain the contact of two particles produce a number entirely less or more than the number originally taken in the contact? If two particles combine to make one, where to one go, and if two combine together and form many particles, where did those come from? This contradicts ordinary mechanics because in classic mechanics the contact between two object changes their position relative to the repulsion caused by each to the other depending on the force of impact.
What is happening when two particles collide and either only one or many other particles are caused, in both cases the same phenomena is occurring but at different degree. When two particles collide and a multiple number of other particles come about, this means that the energy generated by the impact, be it in the form of gamma-rays, reveals the fabric of space, which contains and holds all the possible moments of that particle in time. The collision does not literally bring about more from less, as if from 2 particles 10 more fall out, but what is happening is that the flash from the gamma-rays literally reveal the particles at different moments in time, and therefore particles that where not there at one moment, all the sudden appear and are present and there.
two particles collide become a single mass after collision. When two particles collide and only one particle is revealed the gamma-ray flash is weak and only reveals the nearest next possible moment those particle are in.
So we see that from the interaction of two particles only one particle is present, perhaps this plays on the probability that at the future moment one of the particles collapsed, as particles seem to collapse and than generate into momentarily, every instance a particle either disappears and appears.
The gamma ray flash reveals the particles in their other dimensions. The flash just reveals more of spacetime, which is filled with the future moments.
Double split
When the electron is in wave form, it is potential, a wave geometrically is a line, and a line has infinite points. This is why when the electron comes out of the slit it becomes many, because before going in, it is not in particle form but in wave form which means it is potentially a lot of particles.
Strings first —dimensional
We zoom into particles and than in that zoom state we look out as far as possible, this reveals the first dimensional object we know as “strings” in string theory. Strings are these 1-dimensional edge states of an event, imagine a plain turned to the side, or viewed from its side.
If you rotate a square at a perfect angle, it just simply becomes a line. But how in that same line in reverse contains all the angles that make up a square? line discloses all of it’s possible quantities like length, width, depth, etc., how do we derive from a line a square.
Strings are ultimately the conception at its angle, and the angle is where all the possible quantities is present, for example a complete angel presupposes that all the measures begins at the angle. An angle is defined as two rays, called the sides of the angle, sharing a common endpoint. The presupposition is not that two already assumed to be present lines meet together to form the endpoint, but rather the endpoint itself is shared by two lines. In other words, the endpoint which is what we take to be the meeting point of two separate lines, is in fact the point where the two lines are parallel, this is why we can discern two lines to be separate in the first place, you can only have two lines once they are parallel to each other, otherwise it is the same and one exact line. And so the angle cuts off a line into two rays.
Gravity is simply the influence of possible events on a real event at the present. What makes events possible and not real is not that they are not present, but only that they are not present at a single period of time. This means that an event is possible because it is not present at the same space where the observer is, in other words, the observer and the event do not share the same space, but that does not mean that a moment in possibility does not share any space. A possible moment attracts matter from one space towards it.
This is what we call “warp” in spacetime, when a certain amount of matter is warped into a singularity point. From a purely physical standpoint, this phenomenon seems to be convoluted, but from a time standpoint, it makes complete sense, it is entering a future space, but because the space in outer-space is so empty, and the items usually being warped are so big, we see a great convulsion of matter.
one of the closest possibility of those particles in the next moment in the fabric of spacetime.
When you condense gravity together, or rather gravity itself, is this first and second dimension of things unobserved in space, but having an indirect affect on all things. So that when two object are bound together by a gravitational field, they are bound together by a series of necessary moments in time. The moments in time between them can’t come closer but cannot break away.
For example an extra terrestrial being would manipulate time by somehow suspending the necessary moments that come between one point and another, the point they are leaving and the point they want to get to is mediated by a series of necessary points that must happen in order for one point to reach the other, in order to go downtown I must get up travel 20 minutes to get there, let’s say I walk 20 minutes to get there, a lot has happened, I witnessed someone fall, many trees, I looked up down saw someone etc., all these events happened within that time span, now imagine is read of walking I took a taxi, that 20 min is now reduced to 5, so that the speed of the car took out all those possibilities that could have happened within the longer duration of time of 20 minutes. Aliens would manipulate these moments, this is why ufos are observed to be standing in one place than all the sudden they appear in another,
You surf the internet with knowledge