Section 29 (last updated 1.23.2021)
Oscillations
The proposition of String theory’s one-dimensional objects called “strings” describes how point-like particles of particle physics propagate through space.
The “vibrational “state of the “string” explains the mechanical phenomenon whereby “oscillations” occur about an – equilibrium point. This entire description denotes how the uncertainty of spacetime, coming in-and-out of Being, forms a stable conception for the observer.
According to String Theory, the notion of “vibration” describes a fundamental formal activity – an activity, in Philosophy, denoting Form. Unfortunately, vibration is usually seen as a wholly “mechanical” process, meaning that as a fundamental activity, it belongs as an extension of some “physicality” repetitively exhibiting it. The inverse view, instead offers the alternative that, the existence of the “activity” as a fundamental logical principle is, what constitutes the “object” as the – process of the activity.
What the term “vibration” is as representing a “pure logical activity”, is what concerns the quantum mechanical investigation. For example, Oscillation is used to describe the way vibration operates as defined by, repetitive variations, typically happening in time, of some measure, about a central value (often a point of equilibrium) or; between two or more different phsyical states. Why is there a repetitive variation of some measure in the process of vibration [?], is not properly explained by our ordinary observations of daily phenomena exhibiting vibrational patterns.
The concern of string theory in describing the notion of “vibration” is to show how the objects of sense awareness, themselves are constitutions of more unstable fundamental activities. In other words, how can a vibrational activity constitute, for sense awareness, a static object, yet capable of motion? What is the “vibrational pattern” that sustains a “physical” object over time? In other words, ordinary sense experience perceives objects that appear to be a certain kind of way, while they exhibit motions and actions that may-not be predictable, and are therefore always in an uncertain way. On the other side, when quantum science observes in these macroscopic objects more inherently unstable microscopic activities, that presumably are “there” to sustain the object, these minute components exhibit an entirely different domain of reality whereby they operate in, and yet somehow, they sustain the macroscopic world of our senses we take to be the “our” reality.
Pendulum
When oscillations is periodic, we see that it is desirable because it exhibits order. For example the motion of a pendulum, the motion of a tuning fork, the reed in a woodwind instrument or harmonica, a mobile phone, or the cone of a loudspeaker. On the other hand vibration is undesirable, wasting energy and creating unwanted sound when is seen as random. For example, the vibrational motions of engines, electric motors, or any mechanical device in operation are typically unwanted. Such vibrations could be caused by imbalances in the rotating parts, uneven friction, or the meshing of gear teeth. Careful designs usually minimize unwanted vibrations.
In either cases, vibration proves only to be a repetitive movement of some quantity. However, in the subatomic realm, quantum mechanics cannot relay on some predisposed quantity as exhibiting the activity of vibration because the existence of the quantity must be accounted by the quality of the activity itself, or that the activity itself is represented by the quantitive measure that is the object. For example, the “string” in String Theory is meant to characterize the one dimensional objects, which are quantities of pure activities.
A line has a dimension of one because only one coordinate is needed to specify a point on it. A temporal dimension is a dimension of time. Time is often referred to as the “fourth dimension” for this reason, but that is not to imply that it is a spatial dimension. A temporal dimension is one way to measure physical change. It is perceived differently from the three spatial dimensions in that there is only one of it, and that we cannot move freely in time but subjectively move in one direction. Time is one dimensional because it is the concept of pure activity. Objects in one dimension can only be described by the property of “moving on”, this is why they are never static for observation, which does not mean they are not definite as they are enteral, but they are enteral precisely in being never grasped particularly (add here whitehead the passage of nature)
In our daily observation of measurable phenomenon we look at some object exhibiting some activity and assume that the activity to be resultant from the object. In quantum mechanics no object must be assumed as exhibiting some activity without that activity responsible for the form of the object.
Instead vibration must be seen as motion of generating the quality that proves the form of object we classify as characterizing that activity, or rather the form of vibration is descriptive of being quality of activity. In the first dimension each sequence of change constitutes a distinct quantity in the motion of some definite quality. For example when a pendulum swings we see the object going either left or right and when left not right and when right not left. But as a first dimensional birch in vibration, the pendulum would appear left and right and in the centre and at every angle at the same time, it would stretch into a wave spectrum rather than a particle. Coming closer to the black hole makes object operate in quantum manner, if you jump in black hole you would freeze etc. In other words, the most recent, which we call present, our noun meaning occurring now, is informed by the verb, to present means to introduce or to bring about. Entering upon a black hole present the most recent moment before being unable to access)
Viberation describes wave-particle unity. How a thing can be both wave and particle at the same time.
In describing the form of the activity we call vibration the quantum state where each sequence of change in motion is required as the quantitive measure of this quality, we have before us an absolute totality presented as “layers” of dimensions, each dimension marking off a quantitive measure of the change in motion of the quality. A dimensions is a quantitive measure of a shift in the motion of change. The recognition of change that is distinguished from the motion it is part of constitutes the quantity “dimension”, generally defined as the measurable extent of some kind. The question becomes; what quality maintains itself as trans-dimensional such that the transition of this quality through each dimension as each is the record of a quantitive shift in the motion of the activity, constitutes the overall framework of the complex interactions between each distinction made between the dimensions making up the quality that supersede them as the whole? When we say that thought is the quality that remains no thing so as to constitute each thing, we do not mean that it being “nothing” is some measurable quantity like a blank space or black void, for these are measurable so far as identified as such by sense awareness.
Thought is not the lack of thing, inept of some kind, because that is a measure of it as a passive action from some presumed quality. In quantum mechanics however the existence of any given quality cannot be merely accepted on that ground that some activity is abstracted from it, because the abstraction of some activity from some object is an active effect of thought that proposes to categorize thought as the passive ineptitude. The very contested nature of thought is an active contention rendering the principle of its own self negation as negating a fundamentally active attribute. Thought is first and foremost always a positive principle. But only positive in form negative in content, the content being that which thought supersedes, the object of thought. Thought as nothing is the trans-dimensional quality that constitutes the manifold of dimensions as outlined by string theory. In other words, Thought insofar as reason is the essence of consciousness is nothing insofar as it is the framework, the “landscape”, whereby the complexity of a given fundamental dimension against another is held in place. Thought is the relation, think of it as that which always escapes the identification such that when ever something is defined, thought becomes the inversion making that identity. For example, if we look at any basic shape, we often pay attention to the shape and ignore that without the plane, the shape cannot be distinctive (Alan watts world as emptiness). We can say it is the plain they maintains the shape however this is not fully correct either, because once we recognize the plain, we see that it is outlined by the shape, and so in an unconscious sense we recognize the plain as much as the shape, the point is thought is the relation between the plain and shape such that it is thought that it is the actual context whereby the plain and shape are distinguished and seen as the same thing, but thought insofar as making this recognition is not any of these themselves but is only onlooking of them and never directly conceived like its conception.
Reality is enteral and so every possible thought has already been to some extent elucidated. Why there is such a barrier in reality that disallows a conception of all possibilities is a question of thought as a principle of efficiency. Thought itself is the barrier between dimensions because given it is that onlooking substance, reality is divided by its very conceptions, when thought is recognizing the conception of one given dimension it does not recognize the conception of an other simultaneously because the conception of the other is the very barrier of the conception of this one as not recognizing the other. The world consists literally of infinite layers of dimensions held distinctly by the thought attached to the distinction of that dimension as distinct. Thought is divided into thoughts alien from each their as each is the record of the given conception of that thought, but all distinctions of thought are transcended by the thought disclosing the totality of distinctions.
This is why our given conception of the world is so limited when the world is theoretically infinite in dimensional complexity each of which characterizing the possibility idea of some thought. When individuals access the fundamentally abundant molecule dmt, they access for a small period of time the trans dimensional thought which eventually becomes transcended by the limit of the very limited thought which accessed it.
Being in a planet is being on a sphere and technically there is the possibility given the nature of a sphere to enter an infinite number of geometric dimensions. It is most efficient for our given physical shape to be in the kind of environment we are in now, but the environment we operate in is simply an idea exhibited on a sphere, like a movie projected on a white wall, our particular physical reality is exhibited on the universal form a sphere. Theoretically but likely inefficient given the particular nature of your physicality, our mind can enter upon an entirely unaccustomed physically structured world than the one we ordinarily and effectively operate in. This is however dangerous as it might disembowel the particular configuration of the physical body, hence drugs cause death because the cause the mind to enter upon a physical structure of reality inconsistent with the body taking the drug causing a common malfunction like heart attack etc.
the “vibrational” quality of “string” is the indeterminate quality of reality of all possible events happening simultaneously at an instance. These events serve as potential routes of approximation for a moment constituting reality, or a present moment for an observer.
Quantum level
In the science of ontology the term “quantum” refers to the fundamental realm of nature where the logical determinations of reason that apply quantitive standards of measurement are themselves the quality for the observations.
(Universe as self-exciting circuit) (add to the spherical nature of consciousness- fish eye net view, when you perceive someone as the kind of object they are, that conception f them is objective so far as it is the same conception they are perceiving you with as the kind of object you are, both are accessing the same continuity but are themselves different angles of it . At the quantum levels, what ever you perceive are certain stages constituting the psyche that is conceiving them. Just like you see a person of which they are a reflection of the species that marks the certain level of development your conception of that is in. When you look at the quantum realm, you see the foundational structures of the mind constituting the capability of that conception to retrieve back into that state.)
Physical standards like atoms, strings etc., that are necessary for quantitative measurements are generated from a logical basis that is implicit in their establishment. In other words, in order for something to be generated, it must be conceived. This is not the subjective idealistic claim that the very observation creates the phenomena; or the phenomenon somehow comes into being when it is observed. Instead this claim requires an explanation of what we understand by physical objects containing the inherent logical operations necessary for their being and knowing.
(Add indeterminacy)
Quarks
String theory is dealing with a level of nature that allows for the distinction of one conception from an other and in this we have the compartmentalization of the atom into “quarks”. Quarks are never directly perceived but are deduced as relations of intrinsic properties like electric charge, mass , colour and spin combine together to form the composite particle “hadrons”, the most stable of which are neutrons and protons together constitute the components of the nuclei of the atom.
The term “Quarks” almost assumes a merely mechanical connotation as if they are pieces fitting together or gears grinding. Quarks are more like the “cells” of an atom, but what they involve is anything but mechanical because they intensively consists of dynamical and constantly changing, inherently unpredictable motions called “vibrations”. Quarks are a complexity of so called vibrating “strings” bundled up in an equally shared space conceptualized as round and spherical but internally consists of rugged and obscured variations. What we will come to understand as vibrating strings characterizes the indeterminacy of the conception in determining a particular object.
Before we explore the physical phenomenon of a fundamental mechanics like “vibration”, it is important to understand the philosophical equivalency to which it is demonstrating. The matter of correlating a scientific explanation of a phenomena with a philosophical notion on the nature of being is a difficult issue because language has characterized the world so distinctively that the substances one field of study deals with is viewed so fundamentally different than nabiouring field of study that the understanding almost forgets that all these specializations are fundamentally varying abstractions of the same being.
What science shows philosophy is that being however is not the same, but involves every possibility of being whereas philosophy reminds science to lest not forget that the variety of dimension in nature are in the same conception. The domain of physics for instant differs from chemistry and biology in the sense that the substance, which is motion, is inaccessible to perception whereas the chemicals and organisms to a degree are directly perceived, but gravity for instance is only indirectly tangible.
The ontological principle that the relation is more fundamental than the individuals or; whole is prior to the parts that complies it, is a very difficult notion to understand from the empirical point of view because the whole is said to come after perceiving a compilation of particular abstractions concerning the same object in question. This however constitutes the very limitation of the understanding as conceiving a thing because an object is viewed in part while ignoring that the object must be a whole from which a part of it is conceivable, instead the conceivable parts are said to constitute the whole from a place antithetical to an intial self unity.
For example when perceiving a tree, we see that it involves green, wood hardness etc. But we forget that those qualities are in association to the initial concept of a tree. So that when looking at tree in association with its colour, the understanding takes for granted the question of how the perception not loose the quality of the velour green is in reference to the tree, given that other objects are also green?
The reality is that the tree is a whole or rather the particular relation of its qualities and its qualities which are taken as particular attributes of it are generalities abstracted as forming a part of compilation of the whole. Perception only sees the tree in glimpses of its particular qualities but the tree as a whole of its qualities remains true priorly more fundamental than perception as its abstract form. A priori knowledge is in this sense not perceptual because it is the abstract whole of an object which only partial abstraction, moments, are accessible for perception.
For example when you move a finger side to side in a fast and rapid manner it becomes a blurred spectrum of the finger.
When you stop moving it your finger becomes a definite and particular object taking on a specific position, whereas in a rapid movement side to side it becomes a possibility of being anywhere within its spectrum and therefore takes up all those position by being a blurred and extended wave. Now of-course slow down the speed and the object becomes more definite, but the point is that at a certain rate of motion, the object is occupying all position in space at once. (Wave particle duality- indeterminacy of the conception-vibration)
In rapid motion the finger is simultaneously taken up the possible positions it can at any given moment stop at. Perception does not presuppose simultaneity prior the conception of a thing being at a definite position, but rather it adopt a definite position as the initial point from which other objects move simultaneously relative to. According to Einstein’s special relativity the concept of “distant simultaneity” states that it is impossible for two distinct events to occur at the same time if those events are separated in space.
The reason for this is because the distance in space between the two events constitutes a difference in time, or rather it takes time to travel from one place to another. The important or distant simultaneity is to shows how two events cannot be causally connected depending on the state of motion because one event in a specific location may appear to occur first in a given frame, whereas another event in another location may appear to occur first for a different frame.
For example, Observer 2 perceives events a,b and c to happen at equal times, whereas observer 1 perceives a,b to happen first prior to C because of the closer distance. “For example, a car crash in London and another in New York appearing to happen at the same time to an observer on Earth, will appear to have occurred at slightly different times to an observer on an airplane flying between London and New York. Furthermore, if the two events cannot be causally connected (i.e. the time between event A and event B is less than the distance between them divided by the speed of light), depending on the state of motion, the crash in London may appear to occur first in a given frame, and the New York crash may appear to occur first in another. However, if the events are causally connected, precedence order is preserved in all frames of reference.”
Space is an aspect of the observer that constitutes a simultaneity between the two events having different times.
Simultaneity and order
The ordinary understanding of simultaneity is that there are a set of unrelated events happening at the same time, e.g, a car is beeping, someone is walking, bird is singing etc. The same reference frame captures a bunch of distinct events operating at the same time and creates a general order, ie, a situation is the first order a reference frame finds itself within, which means events having the commonality of being in reference to each other. However different modes of sensation capture simultaneity uniquely.
Sound for example differs from vision when there are two tones present at the same time, hearing cannot distinguish the source from which they originate from and they seem to be part of the same frequency. In sound the observer cannot pick out dimensional separation between distinct noises because every noise is fundamentally the same dimension, I.e, pressure, whereas in sight a rock has different dimensions than a tree. At a deeper level of analysis the understanding is able to group the simultaneity of the same things at different levels of their duration. For example in the act of eating there is a simultaneity between someone finishing a meal and someone just starting one. In an abstract analysis, or in a vacuum state, these constitute different extents of the same duration.
Time as meditation
Definition of mediation:
“mediating is nothing but self−identity working itself out through an active self−directed process; or, in other words, it is reflection into self, the aspect in which the ego is for itself, objective to itself. It is pure negativity, or, reduced to its utmost abstraction, the process of bare and simple becoming.”
Every moment is eternal if conceived in a vacuum state, it only becomes corruptible when there is a change to a different moment. The change of reference from one moment to another constitutes a duration of time. The common expression “I do not have enough time” or “time is going so fast” are all due to the fact that the observer is meditating between a multitude of events during their daily experience. The sum total of mediating between all possible events constitute motion of time.
Aristotle’s form is usually confused with being the exterior frame, the outline of something. This however makes it difficult to understand how the form provides the matter with its identity because the form as a frame is always moving and changing outline so that it appears to be maintained as the same identity by a still and concrete matter.
So that when your hands are close together or far apart changes the form as a frame and from this point the substratum is not the same form the moment it changes frame. This however is not what Aristotle means by form because even a still and a static concrete substrate like the concrete of a brick at a microscopic level involves moving particles changing their frame while constitute the form of the concrete.
Form is the focus of conception to abstract a definite thing from a field of indeterminate possibilities. Form is the concentration of the consciousness and this is not externally imposed as we know vision to be perceiving and external object but the concentration of the consciousness itself becomes the formula that is the object.
The way a single particular object is picked out from a field of indeterminate potentiality is not the same way we normally associate with the selection of certain things and the exclusion of others. When we pick something out for example a single fruit from a market stand full of different fruits of the same kind, we have a bundle of particular objects of the same kind and a single one based on a peculiarity is physically selected and removed from the bunch. This ordinarily however presupposes the more fundamental process of how a group of particular things even come into focus as distinct entities.
Take for example the geometric notion of a “circle on a sphere”
The radius is the relation of two external points from each other A and B. From first perspective point of view point A is the self identity of the point which extends its consciousness outwards to a point B. The conception of B by A is disclosed by a circumference of possibility where a centre point C conceives A as being capable of conceiving B anywhere on its circumference.
A) The object being perceived constitutes the distinct point from the observer, the object of the conception B) the conception is itself also an object because its disclosure of its object constitutes its circumference, C) the conception and the object are potentially each other because anywhere on the circumference is a specific point distinct from the centre of the circle and the centre of the circle is disclosed by a circumference which is a line extended and therefore is a wave having any distinct spot on it be a point and exhibits curvature because what is being extended is a point which is itself inherently spherical.
It is important to note that a principle is a presupposition that is always there even if not relevant to be revealed as a premise in an argument. For example, when we speak of a straight line as purely distinct from a point plain circle etc. We do not bring up the necessity of curvature even though a line always presupposes the feature of curvature because so far as it consists of point extended and the point inherently involves curvature because a point is a sphere, a straight line is a mere abstraction from a dynamical activity of an extended point falling or collapsing into a curved motion replacing back into itself. A straight line therefore presupposes a constantly curving point. This means that a straight line is always fundamentally wiggly, I.e, a string , from which the abstraction of straightness is extrapolated as an ideal which at the same time straightness functions as the structure maintaining curvature.
Zero-point energy is the energy of the conception.
(Add hyperbola to light cone)
(add to below gravity motion ball ground entanglement)
( add entropy involving chaos)
Quarks operate exactly in the way of entropy involving chaos because strings are simply an indeterminate motion of any possibility of a thing. This indeterminate potentiality of any object is determinate as ongoing moving uncertainty, when it becomes an actual particular object, that certainty is the force exerts away the indeterminate motion from itself into the inverse direction until it becomes another certainty as a particular object which pushes the indeterminate motion of uncertainty away and so on and so forth.
A string is indeterminate motion becomes a certain particular angle and goes onto indeterminately to become another particular angle. The sum of these angles is the so called uncertainty they share becomes itself certain by being shared by them, and therefor becomes the form universal to them all,
The spherical nature of a quark, which is by no means random, is being shared by the particular angles of a string, but implicitly it is their indeterminate motion being bounced around by the certainty it causes to than be repulsed by again indeterminately. random” angles and shapes of the strings.
The randomness is shared by the differences of the strings is the overall ordered form disclosing them.
The loops of the string are defined by whenever the uncertainty changes. A change in an uncertainty is a certainty added to the form of the whole a particular part in the structure. This is called “quark flux tube”
If one tries to pull the quarks farther and farther apart, the growing energy of the flux tube eventually favors the creation of another quark/anti-quark pair in the middle of the existing quark pair; the string breaks, and is replaced by two new flux tubes connecting the two new pairs of quarks.”
But the old ones do not disappear instead this is how a a geometric shape is created.
Quarks are bound together by the strong interaction. Bound quarks are constantly exchanging virtual gluons, which we can think of as forming a flux tube similar to a string stretching between the two particles. As the quarks are pulled apart, the potential energy between them grows, and is eventually equal to the amount of energy required to create two more quarks. At this point, the flux tube or string breaks, two more quarks are formed, and the quarks are once again bound in pairs.”
The degree of a string’s curve changes the fundamental particle from an electron to a gluon. These changes however all constitute different portions of the same body
This is the content of the quark abstracted from the spherical form disclosing it.
According to super symmetry underlying the most basic form is the most general form.
(Connected to pre-Socratic delineation on being)
Compactification is one way of modifying the number of dimensions in a physical theory. In compactification, some of the extra dimensions are assumed to “close up” on themselves to form circles.[23] In the limit where these curled up dimensions become very small, one obtains a theory in which spacetime has effectively a lower number of dimensions. A standard analogy for this is to consider a multidimensional object such as a garden hose. If the hose is viewed from a sufficient distance, it appears to have only one dimension, its length. However, as one approaches the hose, one discovers that it contains a second dimension, its circumference. Thus, an ant crawling on the surface of the hose would move in two dimensions.[24]
Compactification can be used to construct models in which spacetime is effectively four-dimensional. However, not every way of compactifying the extra dimensions produces a model with the right properties to describe nature. In a viable model of particle physics, the compact extra dimensions must be shaped like a Calabi–Yau manifold.[23] A Calabi–Yau manifold is a special space which is typically taken to be six-dimensional in applications to string theory. It is named after mathematicians Eugenio Calabi and Shing-Tung Yau.[25]
cross section of a quintic Calabi–Yau manifold
Different levels of physicality
In general, the term duality refers to a situation where two seemingly different physical systems turn out to be equivalent in a nontrivial way.
One of the relationships that can exist between different string theories is called S-duality. This is a relationship which says that a collection of strongly interacting particles in one theory can, in some cases, be viewed as a collection of weakly interacting particles in a completely different theory. Roughly speaking, a collection of particles is said to be strongly interacting if they combine and decay often and weakly interacting if they do so infrequently
These vibrations constitute the content of idea of vibrations challenges the “point-like particle” of particle physics by denoting the more fundamental one-dimensional state called “strings” which are not any stable object but a form of osculation movements. One dimensional is spectrum involves a more observable properties than the 0 dimensional point like property of a classic particle because a point like particle is a static abstraction whose features are explainable only due to its more dynamical interaction as a one dimensional state that maintains it.
Keep in mind that in metaphysics what it means for something to be more fundamental is not necessarily more minute in magnitude. A thing more fundamental than another is not necessarily smaller. The association in modern physics of the microscopic revealing the fundamental operations of nature is one arrived at from a method which goes to the minute levels to find the basics of dimension . But the basics of nature can also equally be arrived at by flying out far away as possible from things, like something which can go at the speed of light arrives at the most general picture of things. The reality however is that something at a naturally fundamental level breaks through into a threshold beyond a minute or expansive magnitude. For example something operating at the speed of light does not go away from things but rather expands into them because light is the most extensive magnitude disclosing all things reaching the limit of light is identical with the disclosure of things. Likewise something entering a microscopic level is at the same time opening up an expansive dimension to enclose a decreasing extension.
String theory proclaims that even more fundamental to the components of the atomic nuclei are “vibrations” which are not currently explained by modern standards and so they are halted off as the understanding’s incapacity to comprehend at the moment. Science always does this when it reaches a dead-end in thinking and patiently awaits for a new kind of hypothesis, which is always philosophical, to catopolte it into deeper revelation of theory. But string theory does offer up a consideration; at levels even more fundamental than atomic nuclei, there is a continuum between the uncertainty in conceiving something and the uncertainty inherent in physical motion maintaining the thing being perceived.
There is a synchronization between the uncertainty innate in the object and the external uncertainty conceiving it. Putting aside the observer effect that, the conception changes the phenomenon, whether one causes the other, there is an intensive and extensive uncertainty that is meditated by the same certainty, the distinction they share. This means that the uncertainty shared by two things constitutes their certainty. String theory without explaining what the motion of uncertainty means, makes the movements of vibration be the determining factor of a particle type. This is a modern empirical illustration of Aristotle’s ancient notion of form is the activity determining the physical object.
String theory takes the uncertainty of these basic vibrating motions as the raw material- a pattern from which form is generated. Probability is a kind of motion more fundamental than locomotion. Probability is the quantitive measure of potentiality and is a generative motion of simultaneity and instantaneity. In the definition of simultaneity factors stipulate opposing inversion because within the same framework of time there is no discernible difference between one factor coming after or prior to the other. Instantaneity is the quality where the set of inverse factors simultaneous in time have the same initial emergence of coming into concurrence. It is these initial conditions of probability that constitute the capacity of Generation for one thing is not production of a thing into being from which it was not there before, but rather the continuous being of something, I.e, what constitutes a becoming? Generation is a spectrum of time in which several events taken on sequential duration. The sequence presupposed by durations that constitute the quality of generation occur in an order not where the parts are distinct from each other as separate wholes but the capacity of distinction whereby a set of variables form a series define the nature of the particular whose function provides the form shared by the factors simultaneously distinguished by it.
Person running
What it means for a particular to carry with it the sequence of its total events relates to the nature of the particular as the discrete measure of a continuous duration. The question of discreteness is how the order of the particular arranged relative to other particulars is also at the same time the very same order that constitutes the form of the particular. The answer has to do with the logical nature of dialectic where the inverse determination of a definite action is synthesized by the distinction to form an identical entity that is able to move in the opposing determinations constituting its self unity. Take for example the directions of up, down left, right:
Is the particular each specific direction (pointed by the red) or are the directions together as a unit particular? On the one hand each direction on its own is distinct but cannot be particular because any single direction, say “left”, taken on its own presupposes “right”, both of which presuppose a place to the top which then supposes a bottom place. Hence any single direction on its own presuppose the totality of all direction as a particular unit. The directions together form a single body which is able to go in each single direction at a single time.
The particular identified as “I” does not stand alone independent from its past and future conduct. The past is not something that no longer exists. Likewise the future is not something that does not yet exist. The object identified as a particular in any given moment carries with it the sequence of all its past and future experiences as part of its durability. The past and future paves an abstract path which the particular in the present realizes by experiencing. The duration is the degree between past and future the measure between these two extreme points of time is both intensive and extensive. For example past is a second ago or thousands of years ago. The continuity between one and ten thousands seconds are all the discrete numbers between them and after.
The particular is made up of all the events that it will experience.
(Add to quantum vibrations)
The particular object is a moment in a sequence, the sequence belongs abstractly within it as the uncertainty principle- the possibility of one event transitioning into other events . The indeterminacy of the object is the energy, entropy, whereby one event transitions into the other events constituting continuity of duration. In Ancient Greek en-trope, means ‘en’ for inside, and ‘trope’ for transformation. Entropy is the study of internal transformation but there are a few inconsistencies in the modern definition of it. On the one hand entropy is a thermodynamic quantity representing the “unavailability” of system’s thermal energy for conversion into mechanical work. This lack of work is interpreted as the degree of randomness or disorder. You would think that randomness or chaos is still a form of energy especially in reference to the function of entropy as a means of transfer between two sources.
The reason why the lack of conversion of energy into mechanical work is associated with randomness or chaos is because a system inept of any work is non-discernible. Randomness and chaos in this sense is defined as lack of knowing or indeterminacy of a system, that a system being unknown is identical with what it means to be random. And this makes logical sense because an unknown system is potentially anything and is therefore indeterminate. But if the transformation is itself the unknown element characterizing randomness than we have a gap when one definite state changes into another. Associating the change with the unknown element defining randomness makes the change a void, which stops short of answering why one state transforms into another specifically with the significance that the transformation itself is an energy for work.
The answer to why the unknown characterizes thetransformation of one definite state into another is as precisely what we stated before and constitutes the fundamental principle of chaos theory: the reason why the change of one definite state into another state associates the transformation with randomness is because the indeterminacy of the change itself meditating the states is the possibility of something potentially being anything. During the change of something it is potentially anything, including the thing it will change to. The transformation of one particular state into another particular state is meditated by the universal possibility of every other state.
The energy that transforms one state to another is the total possibilities of all other states. What determines one exact thing to be another exact thing and not any other thing is the conception disclosing a certain sequence of events related together. Quantum entanglement explains how a conception can disclose any particular events together from the potentiality of all events. (Add quantum entanglement) The conception whenever discloses an object can itself be disclosed as an object by another conception. The conception is the elusive nature, which means that any two objects separated by space and time can still relate together by the conception.
The conception is the entanglement between events distinguished by space and time. This is how in the first place events lead into other events. The change of one event to an other event is the same as the possibility of all events determined to certain events. (Add to the Big Bang, the Big Bang is not a historical event that occurred in the beginning of the universe but is exactly an ongoing law of entropy, change, one object changing to another is caused by the force of total existence- the total course of all events causes two events to be concur after another. This is the butterfly effect, that the indeterminacy of one event changing to another is the entire course of existence.)
The transition of one event to another is caused by a particular observer acting as the divide-discrete measure- of the indeterminate flow of events. Any present moment is a single abstraction of the particular observer determining certain experience of event by intersecting an indeterminate flow of events generally.
the physicality of reality at the DNA level is not the same at the level of the object it makes up. The physics of reality change at that level, and therefore the physical composition also. In other words, DNA is not made up of flesh like a hand is that consists of DNA. instead DNA is not spatial it is rather temporal, meaning it is all the events that can possibly happen to that object, say the hand, all the events that can happen to it, like breaking an arm, or working it out etc., are all encompassed as the possible events forming the object.
(This is the collection of DNA forming the particular body that undergoes throughout the experience of the duration.
Natural discretion
(Add better out of focus meter images)
There is a disconnect in time between the conception of thought and the present moment it is physically experienced in. This is classically known as the mind-body dualism or thought object distinction but in reality this is a contrast in time between mind and matter outside the present moment. The conception on its own in thought is abstract because it is uncertain, it is never in the present moment and not directly experienced. A thought outside the present moment is abstract because it cannot be precisely defined and it is in a flux of uncertainty because the conception of it happens at an instant and there is not enough time to distinguish it from another conception that occurs simultaneously. The present moment is made to capture a particular conception into the physical mould for experience. Matter outside the present moment is also in a state of uncertainty but the way it is indeterminate is by being undistinguished.
The amount of time it takes
This in string theory is the malleable nature of matter in an abstraction of taking on a mould of a definite conception. In general relativity the nature of matter is defined as the indivisibility between spacetime. On earth the measure of distance can be made by space covered, e,g, in kilometres, and distinctively we say that takes a corresponding amount of time. In outer space, time itself is the object which can be shaped, “fabric of space”. When scientists say that it takes this and this lightyears to get to a location in space, it means that it takes that amount of time for the space to generate into being, a location in outer space is not yet generated prior to arriving to it, the time it takes to arrive to it is identical with it actually being there.
A wormhole for example is the condensing of two points in space into a single point, is the same process of two points in time constituting the same moment, a pat and a future point meet at the present. This is a form of entanglement where two potential conceptions at different points in time meet at the same present moment. The mind has an idea in the past relative to a present moment, and there is the future potential of matter, that the present moments moves towards bringing the idea and the matter together. The relativity of two points in time not sharing the same present moment begins with the fact that both are at a present moment away from each other, at their present moment when they do not share the same moment, each to the other is a future moment in time, a potential moment.
When I am at the grocery store I am at that present moment, but my wife is back at home during her present moment, to me she is at a future moment when I arrive home and to her I am a future moment also vice versa,
Matter is malleable and outside the present moment it is undifferentiated and will take the form of another conception in the future. At the present matter captures the form of a conception arrived at in time. Matter and the conception meet to prove the determinateness of thought by experience
This is the idea of parallel universes, simply means the warping of spacetime causes a disconnect in time, or rather speeds up time, brings a potential moment into a present one.
Parallelogram
This disconnect outside the present moment and the connect during the present moment between conception and object is the fundamental process happening during DNA replication. The separation of the strand is the reconstruction of the matter forming the present moment so that a new connect of a duration occurs again, this deconstruction is the simple moulding of a matter to meet a new conception.
There is discreteness or discretion between these concurring events in a sequence that is precisely the particular object that undergoes each event during a specific point in time. The particular object is the discrete measure between each event happening during a duration.
Every being is orbiting spherically around its counterpart nothing.
This orbiting is not like terrestrial bodies orbit another, that they maintain integrity or the same discrete self and move in location motion another body maintaining identity of itself. The orbiting of being around nothing is like how bodies orbit a black hole. When some object orbits black hole does not maintain an identical of itself, it no longer becomes in a particle state, but gets extended, obscured and stretched.
📷
(Crude illustration)
A single mass gets sucked in and then gets dispersed out, depicted by the red beams, throw out into the universe all the possible variations of that single star, but dispersed it at a microscopic scale, so that one of its particle grows to be itself again, or rather all the particles now dispersed throughout space take on potential states of new stars. This is the function of a black hole, that when a single object becomes sucked in, it no longer represents the sum set of its actions, but rather the sum sets of its potential actions becomes represented as many variations of different objects. When something enters a black hole each sequence takes on an object.
Near a black hole the object enter a wave like function with all its qualities and movements extended as the space spectrum of which its particle like identity of itself is a mere possibility in that continuum. This is how being spatially orbits nothing, and in time being is like a circle extended around nothing, the duration is connected by beginning and end being the same point and the advance is the duration the particle like states experience as going from start point connected back to itself at the end point. From a quantum level, every action and event is a particular particle like point subjectively experience as being new course of conduct as detached from other events, all belong as connected spectrum of the same wave length. It is in this way that we say reality is determined, but in order to be determined in this way the particular has to have the absolute freedom to act on them. This is why your head where thoughts happen and the place where you can’t see behind your eyes is at the center of the environment, it is the void of which the environment is as extended spectrum wraps around.
Unlike a black hole and stars there are more stable forms of this found at the most fundamental states, “strings”.
If an individual comes near a black hole all their possible events would be extended out as a spectrum
Divisibility is multiplicity, a form of generation. The one becomes the many.
(Add Pierce firstness secondness)
Th definition of “Standing wave” is vibration of a system in which some particular points remain fixed while others between them vibrate with the maximum amplitude.
This is the basis of collapsed state- defined as “to fall or shrink together abruptly and completely”
This is the basis of discrete and continuous
standing wave is a stationary state of the string- a spectrum of probability. If wave spectrum of the string is determined exactly in the middle, . The string will stay in this vibrational mode until a particular forces changes it otherwise. If you pull up at the quarter mark and pull down at the three quarters mark and then let go, you will get the second mode. And it will keep on vibrating like that for awhile. The point is that once the string starts to freely vibrate in one mode, it will stay in that mode. It will not turn into another mode. Unless, you perturb it in some way while it is vibrating. If the string is in the second mode and you poke it at the right places at the right times, you can create the fourth mode, or some mix of different modes. Thus, by perturbing the string, you cause “transitions” from one mode to others.
The electrons in atoms behave similarly, except its wave function is the thing that is oscillating. If an electron starts out in some orbital (associated with a particular kind of wave function), it will remain there forever, unless acted on by some perturbation. That perturbation could be a collision of the atom with another atom or an oscillating electromagnetic field (light). If the perturbation gives the electron the right amount of energy, the electron can transition from one orbital to another orbital, or could end up in a superposition of orbitals.” (Qura answer)
Two distinct conceptions simultaneous at the same time cause an abruption , this abruption is instantaneously the wave propagation of their potential places as different conceptions against each other. In a wave function there are electrons particles constantly popping in and out of existence, when two distinct particle arise at the exact same time and location they cause a superposition, a new orbital ring. This is the conception that always exceeds the object so as to disclose it, itself remains inconceivable until is succeeded by another conception disclosing it as an object.
The vibrations and standing wave are the physical obervsation of the fundamental relation between the universal and particular. To understand this relation it is important to dispense with the contrast as to whether the world is predetermined or free. Most thinkers argue with one over the other and while they remain stuck in these fixities of the understanding never really proceed to answer in what way the world is both determined and free? The answer relates to in what way the universe is universal and particular. What is determined in the world is in part potentiality insofar infinity exists as every possibilities. Every possibilities is predetermined as wave spectrum disclosing the sprouting of any event, this is why an electron in an orbital system associated with a wave function remains until acted on.
The energy of unalteration of wave function is its determined potentiality of any possible form. this wave function of potentiality is universal and the reason why it is the continuity between discrete quanta is because any particular event is a determination of a certain potentiality and partaking in the duration of that conception. The particular characterizes freedom because it partakes in an already determined potential state and in doing so actualize it as reality. Predetermined potentiality is universal because it is a characterless abstract state, which means that it is conceivable, that a certain length, height, density mass etc. These certain universal features in a potential kind of relation characterized by a particular conception. (The features that make up an object, like the height, chemicals, colours making up a man are only theoretically derived after the man as a particular whole of a specific relation of these features, because the man is a particular characterization partaking in these features which are otherwise universal abstract because their relations are characterless without a particular.
The secret to the substance of nature is described by a particular having the free choice to determined a universal potential state. The potential state is universal because it is a pure abstract conception eternal and can only be acted on and characterized by a dispensable and changing particular.
Find Alan watts saying the life you living is the life you choice and parking in. Not only is your life determined in that it is a particular partaking in a universal duration of a potential conception, but even during life and so far left over duration is still potential yet to be lived, can still be determined. Even during life the individual conceives the future they partake in.
As to the question of how a pure abstract conception of potential actually determine the content for future reality is by no means an easy answer because it is not as commonly speculated that a wish is granted, that desiring something somehow brings it into being, as we see in the theological idea of a miracle. As to whether these are superstitions let them not mar the relation of thought and its effect on the way matter takes the form of the conception. A proper understanding of the nature of time explains how thought determines the conception of matter.
Infinitesimal as temporal
Time is the context of objects because it determines the relation and order of events; and space is the context in which time is the context of events as these events exhibit a certain form of appearance along with the basic quantitive measures of direction, place, velocity mass etc. (Add Hegel objectivity here) it is first important to ask whether the order of things laid out in their spatial extension as perceived exhibit a correlating objective temporal order of things? If we adopt the order of things laid out in a coherent continuity as perceived during a moment of time, and a moment of time is succeeded by a change into another moment, then the continuity disclosing a set of different things is itself a discrete moment when it changes to disclose other set of different things.
A moment in time is distinguishable and is therefore an abstraction as disclosing a certain order of continuity, and therefore the true temporal order of things is not merely the relation of distinct objects as disclosed by the same conception, but more fundamentally the conception disclosing a continuity of related and different objects is itself a discrete moment because A) in order for things to be continuous and that is there relation they have to be differentiated into others from each other and not be the same thing and B) so far as the similarity shared by different things is what discloses them, their continuity is distinct from each difference as their discrete moment they confide in, itself also changes to disclose the continuous order of other things, is therefore part of each distinct thing disclosed by it. The idea that that the uncertainty is not merely in the limit of the observer’s ability to conceive external phenomena but is an indeterminacy inherent in the form of things; this means that the conception as the disclosure of a continuity of distinct objects is at the same time the discrete element in each particular object it discloses characterized by the indeterminacy of constant change to disclose a set of definite distinguishable things.
The constant alteration characterizing the conception to disclose a set of some things at one moment as opposed to other things at a different moment is the very inherent flux implicit in each thing differentiating them as particular things that are different from each other disclosed within the approximate of the same conception during a moment in time.
indeterminacy between all possible events. operates as the way of vibrations.
The conception is the discrete indeterminacy in each distinct object disclosed by it, that is how it is the continuity shared by different things by changing in each thing.
How can the conception be discrete yet continuous across all unique things? By being identical with the thing as something particular and therefore the conception is as discrete as the thing is different from others, but discloses other things by being extended, changing inside each thing.
Add String and standing wave.
Time limited by place and location conceives it as having a specific direction of motion, getting bigger from smaller, but so far time as generality all these particular conceptions are a simultaneity. Take for example a particular developmental stage in a cycle, day the life cycle of a flower, from the stage of the blossom, the seed is the past and the withering is the future, and there is at least this direction in time from a particular moment. But stand apart from any particular moment and you have each stage in the cycle a simultaneity, the cycle as a whole which is present prior to any particular moment because of the whole or end result is after each moment the future cannot be discerned ?
Hegel being-there
Negation of negation is not a neutralization
Infinitesimal not merely minuteness
The notion of the infinitesimal is usually limited to minute size and this is notably a pragmatism doctrine concerning the concept of infinity. (Find where he says this) Pierce explains that when infinity is applied to size we have infinitesimal magnitude because .
The truth of this reaffirms the limit as disclosure, no matter of the particular measure, the relative size of an object, whether it is the largest in contrast to other objects, in contrast to the conception disclosing it, the object is temporally minute because it is within an order of a class which even if the object is the whole of each smaller parts, it is disclosed by a conception which is extensively greater because within it there is the intensive possibility of disclosing other object. The potentiality of a conception makes it always more extensive than than the object disclosed within it, or there is always space. Space as the external quantity of objects is their externality because the conception is the intensive disclosure of space itself as containing things. The infinitesimal as minute is partially correct but fails when it comes to a measure of time because if
Time being the form of space is inversion magnitude, the smallest spatial extension are inversely the most fundamental and therefore the most comprehensive governing temporal principles, a principle found in the most minute spatial state has the most extensive temporal reach.
Temporal for the purposes of this study is defined as the property of time concerning the order of things.
Strings
Uncertainty is itself the constructive raw material taking on form
The idea of a “string” is flawed when it paints a picture in the reader’s mind of an already processed item that only then afterwards exhibits the motion of vibrations. Rather the image of a string is an analogy by comparing the way a tightly stretched string rattles when pulled on with the movement of mediating between potentially definite forms by not being any of them particularly because the string is moving too fast to be individuated at a particular place but is still itself the individual string occupying all places. In the sub quark levels there are no predisposed items but only the bare motion of vibration, and this is the motion of potentiality exhibits the physical form of obscurity and within this vibration certain forms are picked out and abstracted as certain kind of static objects.
“Strings” are the most extensive form in the universe but not by being the largest objects because spatially an abstraction of a component string is the most minute. The more spatially minute an object is the more temporally extensive it is, prominent everywhere. Extensive measure is determined by intensive numerous-ability and not by size. Any object we see with greater extensive size is made up of an intensive variability of constituents. The reason why extensive magnitude is determined by intensive variability reaffirms the fundamental principle of the species predicates the individual. Osculation is the physical effect caused by the indeterminacy of uncertainty, this movements is by nature variable because it mediated between what it is as one thing versus what it is as an other thing the relation of which is contrasted against what is not, the capacity for its form. The indeterminacy of potentiality has the physical appearance of obscuration or in motion osculation to the senses, a blur of qualities, colour, mass shape, motion direction etc. Pure potentiality as an actual substance is Qualities all blurred together. But this itself as an appearance is illusory because in the abstract function of thought the indeterminacy of potentiality constitutes the power for thought to pick out ideas have clarity of them and not limited to them.
An obscurity in spacetime
A string vibration is the indeterminacy of thoughts taking an infinite value of possible particularities. It is picked out as a particular thing when the motion becomes a definite thing, then inverts in contradistinction to thought generally and begins to move independently as that thing.
(Add universal relation to particular into act below) This infinite uncertainty is universal by being implicit in all particular things as their possibility. The indeterminacy of the conception is not isolate by being unable to be grasped from the outside but is rather internally imbedded in each and every atom as their structure scope from which certain particularities are picked out in relation to each other forming a single form. This is why in string theory they always says that atoms are always moving, their strings constantly vibrate. Every atom in the body is rattling.
The idea that uncertainty itself is the raw constructive material for a particular thing is difficult to conceptualize but is actually evident in the framework of any productive endeavour. For example a construction of house begins with an array of woods, metals, tools etc. and when these materials are together in a bundle it is not at all evident how they will form the house, their form is uncertain. The bundle of material exhibit an uncertainty until a blue print is brought to demonstrate how they ought to be put together to form the structure. The idea of a house which is their aim determines a certainty for the bundle of raw material of which without the idea of a house involves an uncertainty of their relations.
(?)Adopting this same idea to the surface of the macroscopic experience we find that everything appears on the one hand internally static in the sense that things are picked out and conceived, but externally in motion because they move by classical mechanics relative to each other. On the other hand we find by inverting our thought from the outside inwards and away from what is delivered by perception, we find that our thinking is internally indeterminate because it a constantly in motion but unlike the motion of classical mechanics where there is locomotion, and a definite object operating within it that the thing in motion is discernible against another body; Abstract motion is constant shift and change in generation of a thing, there is a constant change of form internally always occurring, the springing forth of ideas. Every atom that constructs a discernible conception of an object is infinitely in constant change in form, this is the implied uncertain material it is constructed of, by this is meant an eternal constantly changing form, part of its possibilities is its particular nature
(Add to above time temporal order conception as the disclosure of things is discrete in each thing as the content of the conception.)
The conception is the eternally changing form implicit in each particular thing as they are.
which abstract the ever change into a static abstraction of a thing, but because the particular presupposes the uncertainty from which it is abstracted as particular, the particular thing in itself is the principle of uncertainty, and so an abstraction of itself into a static particular away from a universal change, is actualized by a conception of itself as an external object disclosed by the reference frame of its indeterminacy. the aim becomes to pick out the universal indeterminate change as each and every single one of a particular abstraction by an order of foundation. In each particular thing is the universal indeterminate uncertainty and this is why we have one thing and not an other. nature is fundamentally metaphysical, corresponding to that is our most elementary sciences are always ontological.
. beyond light, nothing can go faster than light or rather the conception exceeds light by disclosing it.
(Add to above infinitesimal temporal)
Big Bang inflation
The Big Bang idea of “inflation” asserts that in a small region of space in a short period of time, the universe become into being by growing exponentially fast. The universe grew within short period of time from the smallest possible size to the biggest possible magnitude.
This growth is argued to have occurred faster than the speed of light which immediately seems to contradict the fundamental law that- Nothing is faster than the speed of light. However the law that nothing is faster than light technically means nothing can move through the universe faster than the speed of light. But if we introduce the limit as part of the universe than what it is exceeded by the existence of the universe by being more fundamental is the generative, its becoming is prior to its being. Becoming is more fundamental than anything already existing because a thing must come to exists. Becoming is also a kind of being means being is always becoming.
Nothing disclosed within the known universe can go faster than light because light is more fundamental than any element, yet what is more fundamental than light is it’s coming into being, discloses light because even light comes to be.
Add Hegel nature isn’t complete without mind and mind isn’t real without nature (5:01:00)
The extent of this growth is measured as having a directions, that is, in a second the universe expanded from size smaller than an atom and from this towards a much larger size. It is not clear as to why the universe begin off small and expanded large? The idea of inflation become a kind of methodology to measure cause and effect having a certain direction or being a certain kind of “way”. When it comes to a finite quantitive measure of the universe , from a position within it, the universe is a structure with a certain measure having a definite direction of motion. The empirical fact of inflation that the spatial extension of the universe has a growth from a minute size to a large size cannot be used for an ontological justification to claim that the universe, being something, came out of nothing; that one is first and the other comes after as second because this is an instance of the misplaced concreteness fallacy. from the smallest size arose the largest size is suggested to imply that something with a certain size either too small or too big becomes inconceivably measurable, to big becomes beyond the observing faculty, too small is inaccessible to the observing faculty. From this infinitesimal degree in magnitude modern physics speculates that in order for something to exists and not be nothing requires to be within a certain range for observation, limit of size.
What they fail to acknowledge is that even if the universe is reducible to nothing there is still at least the conception of that. By ignoring the conception as it relates to certain measure of the object denoting its existence, many astrophysicists formulate that first the universe was small than second grew much bigger, without realizing that these extents of magnitudes are extremes derived from the same synonymous conception, they are simultaneous aspect of the same conception. This meditation from the smallest size to the biggest are logical extremes. The extremes in magnitudes needs to first be established to necessarily contain the extent of all possibilities of moderations. Logically you need to first have the two most extremes forms of something to discern moderate forms.
Spacetime is taken as cause of objects form but it is not a cause, because it doesn’t explain why something has it form
The contemporary discovery of “Tabby star” KIC 8462852 explained that the star and its orbiting bodies exhibited unnatural dips in brightness. Usually when the terrestrial body orbits the Star scientist discern that the eclipsing of the body passing its star have periodic dips of brightness, but the new discovery suggested that a certain reign in space exhibits very erratic and arbitrary disturbances of the stars light which they speculate is only possible by extra terrestrial advanced intelligent life whose constructing of “Dyson sphere” harness their stars energy, causes these unpredictable disturbances in brightness. Aside from whether these dips in brightness are caused by intelligent life or not, this raises interesting question about what it means for their to be extra terrestrial life? When we think of this notion we like to assume that there are creatures simultaneously existing in different planets separated by vast space, what this common inclination forgets is that the distances in space also constitutes a difference in time, meaning that a certain star at a certain distance away from earth is a potential future point of time.
To help explain this take for example what scientist describe as the most violent event in the universe the merging of black holes. The misapprehension is that black holes are assumed as objects in the universe like any other star or planet, because it exhibits the strongest force of gravity and therefore exhibits mass and anything exhibiting mass qualifies as body. But at the same time black holes do not exhibit any other qualities that makes it body. Black Holes are lack of body but they warp space fabric, black holes are not spatial bodies but temporal ones, they are bodies of pure time. This means that the merging of black holes are different periods of times becoming one period, the present called that way because it is presentable, it is there within the same discernible space. Take for example the merging of two White dwarf , stars have a quantum entanglement in relation to their aging process, when two stars distance from each other by billion light years of their aging process corresponds simultaneously they begin to attract each other across vast distances until they meet and merge, white dwarf merging.
The process of perceiving an extraterritorial age in the future is simultaneously the process for the last point to becomes that future point as the present. Time is not linear, but it is two conceptions of past and future merging as the present, as the same conception. Time is selective process. (Add here string theory above)
Is it the sum of its parts or is it the whole of which the parts are sum?